Install
$ agentstack add skill-daemon-blockint-tech-agentic-enteprises-skill-ai-risk-governance ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AI Risk & Governance
When to Use
- Classifying AI use cases by risk tier and impact
- Drafting AI acceptable-use policies and governance frameworks
- Building AI risk registers with likelihood/severity/mitigation tracking
- Preparing model cards, system cards, or DPIAs for AI deployments
- Reviewing third-party LLM vendors (data terms, fine-tuning, safety commitments)
- Mapping AI products to frameworks (NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act concepts)
- Aligning product and engineering teams with compliance requirements
- Designing human-in-the-loop oversight for consequential AI decisions
When NOT to Use
- Implementing RAG pipelines, agents, or production features →
ai-engineer - Running jailbreak tests or adversarial campaigns →
ai-redteam - SOC 2/ISO evidence automation and technical control mapping →
compliance-engineer - General SOC 2 IT controls without AI scope →
cybersecurity - Commercial/enterprise AI solution architecture →
applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterprise - Skills portfolio governance and publish gates →
ai-skill-manager
Related skills
| Need | Skill | |---|---| | Building LLM products | ai-engineer | | Adversarial testing | ai-redteam | | Research and benchmarks | ai-researcher | | Enterprise security program | cybersecurity | | Pipeline and data security | devsecops | | SOC 2/ISO evidence and technical controls | compliance-engineer | | AI solution architecture (commercial/enterprise) | applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterprise | | Agent skills governance | ai-skill-manager | | Safeguard gateways, classifiers, rollout | ml-infrastructure-engineer-safeguards | | Safety classifier research and benchmarks | ml-research-engineer-safeguards | | Privacy research for safeguards | privacy-research-engineer-safeguards | | Enterprise security risk registers (non-AI scope) | security-risk-analyst | | M&A/investment cyber diligence and board packs | cyber-diligence-governance |
Core Workflows
1. Use-case intake and classification
Capture:
| Field | Purpose | |---|---| | Purpose and users | Scope and accountability | | Data types | PII, special categories, IP | | Automation level | Human-in-loop vs autonomous | | Impact if wrong | Safety, legal, financial, reputational | | External exposure | Customer-facing vs internal |
Risk tier (example):
| Tier | Criteria | Controls | |---|---|---| | Low | Internal, low impact, no sensitive data | Standard policy + logging | | Medium | Customer-facing or internal PII | Review + eval + monitoring | | High | Regulated domain, high impact, autonomous actions | Governance board + red-team + enhanced oversight |
See references/risk_classification.md for EU AI Act–oriented mapping (non-legal).
2. Risk assessment
Use structured worksheet:
- Identify hazards (bias, hallucination, leakage, misuse, dependency)
- Estimate likelihood and severity
- Define mitigations (technical, process, legal)
- Assign owner and review date
- Residual risk acceptance sign-off
See references/risk_assessment.md for worksheets and NIST AI RMF functions.
3. Documentation artifacts
| Artifact | When | |---|---| | Model card / system card | Every production model or vendor model | | Data sheet | Training/fine-tune data described | | Eval summary | Pre-deploy and periodic | | Incident log | AI-specific harms and near-misses |
See references/documentation.md for model card sections and change log.
4. Policy and oversight
- Acceptable use policy (prohibited uses, approval paths)
- Human oversight rules for consequential decisions
- Escalation for policy violations and serious incidents
- Training for builders and reviewers
See references/policy_oversight.md for governance committee cadence.
5. Vendor and third-party models
Review: data processing terms, subprocessors, retention, fine-tuning on customer data, safety commitments, breach notification, exit plan.
See references/vendor_review.md for vendor questionnaire topics.
When to load references
- Tiering and regulation mapping →
references/risk_classification.md - Assessments and frameworks →
references/risk_assessment.md - Model cards →
references/documentation.md - Policies and committees →
references/policy_oversight.md - Vendors →
references/vendor_review.md
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: daemon-blockint-tech
- Source: daemon-blockint-tech/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.