Install
$ agentstack add skill-danaidev-agent-skills-resume-handoff ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Resume Handoff
Overview
Read a handoff document, validate its context against the current repo state, and propose a concrete next-step plan before changing code.
Entry Handling
A) Path provided
- Read the handoff file fully.
- Read any referenced artifacts (plans, research, specs) the handoff calls out.
- Validate file references from “Recent Changes” and “Learnings”.
- Summarize findings and propose next actions; ask for confirmation.
B) Ticket provided (e.g., ENG-1234)
- Look for handoffs in
.ai/shared/handoffs/ENG-1234/. - List files in the directory and select the most recent by the filename timestamp
YYYY-MM-DD_HH-mm-ss. - If no files exist, ask the user for the path.
- Then follow the same flow as “Path provided.”
C) No parameter provided
Respond with a short prompt asking for either a path or a ticket ID, and offer an example.
Analysis Flow
1) Ingest handoff content
- Extract tasks and statuses, recent changes, learnings, artifacts, and action items.
2) Read referenced artifacts
- Read any linked documents, especially under:
.ai/shared/plans/.ai/shared/research/- other explicit paths mentioned in the handoff
3) Validate against repo state
- Confirm file references still exist.
- Check for divergences (missing files, moved code, changed behavior).
4) Report and confirm Present a structured summary and ask for confirmation before making changes.
Use this response pattern:
I've analyzed the handoff from [date] by [author].
Original tasks:
- [Task] — [Status in handoff] → [Current verification]
Key learnings (validated):
- [Learning] — [Still valid / changed]
Recent changes (verified):
- [path/to/file.ext:line] — [Present / missing / modified]
Artifacts reviewed:
- [doc] — [key takeaway]
Recommended next actions:
1. [Action]
2. [Action]
Shall I proceed with action 1, or do you want to adjust the approach?
Guidelines
- Be thorough but concise; focus on what enables the next agent to act.
- Do not assume the handoff state is still valid; verify.
- Avoid big code blocks; use file references.
- Ask for confirmation before making code changes.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: DanAIDev
- Source: DanAIDev/agent-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.