Install
$ agentstack add skill-danieletten-azure-landing-zone-workload-integration-azure-landing-zone-workload-integration ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Azure Landing Zone Workload Integration
Help a workload team integrate a workload into an existing enterprise Azure Landing Zone. The platform already exists — fit the workload into it; do not design or deploy it. Guidance is generic; defer to the user's actual platform contract and organization standards.
When to Use This Skill
- An Azure Landing Zone / application landing zone already exists and a workload
must integrate with inherited policy, central networking, DNS, identity, monitoring, security, cost, and sovereignty controls.
- A deployment is blocked by inherited Azure Policy or a platform dependency
(central DNS, firewall, peering, shared-service access).
- Clarifying workload-team vs platform-team responsibilities.
When NOT to Use
| Scenario | Use Instead | |---|---| | Choosing Azure services from an app idea or codebase | azure-app-onboard | | Designing the platform, landing zone, hub network, or governance | azure-enterprise-infra-planner | | Generating IaC for a known architecture | azure-prepare | | Preflight / infra validation | azure-validate | | Executing a ready deployment | azure-deploy |
Guardrails (non-negotiable)
Never assume subscription Owner rights or public network access. Never assume the workload team owns management groups, central policy, hub networking, firewalls, or private DNS zones. Never recommend a policy exemption before compliant alternatives, duplicate central services without reason, invent organization standards, fabricate MCP tool names or documentation links, or change live Azure resources or deploy without explicit authorization.
Workflow (golden path)
- Establish context — capture inputs with
[assets/workload-integration-assessment.md](assets/workload-integration-assessment.md). If the user is still selecting Azure services from an app idea, hand off to azure-app-onboard.
- Discover the platform contract and split responsibilities — read the
organization overlay .azure-platform/platform-contract.yaml first if present, following [references/platform-contract.md](references/platform-contract.md) for source precedence, provenance, and drift handling; then [references/discovery-and-responsibilities.md](references/discovery-and-responsibilities.md). If no contract is present, say so and operate in degraded discovery mode rather than inventing platform values. Use read-only Azure discovery only with explicit permission.
- Assess relevant integration domains and review workload IaC — apply
[references/integration-decision-rules.md](references/integration-decision-rules.md). Do not rewrite infrastructure unless implementation is requested.
- Handle policy and platform blockers — follow
[references/policy-remediation-and-escalation.md](references/policy-remediation-and-escalation.md); prefer compliant remediation, treat exemptions as a last resort.
- Produce outputs (below), drafting requests with
[assets/platform-team-request.md](assets/platform-team-request.md).
Cite only verified sources from [references/official-source-map.md](references/official-source-map.md); prefer Azure Verified Modules and Bicep in new Azure-only examples, staying usable for Terraform.
Output Contract
Report findings under: (1) confirmed platform context, (2) assumptions and missing information, (3) workload-team actions, (4) platform-team requests, (5) shared decisions, (6) architecture decisions required, (7) policy conflicts and compliant remediation options, (8) exception candidates (if any), and (9) readiness status — one of Ready, Ready with workload actions, Ready after platform dependency, Blocked by workload decision, Blocked by platform dependency, Architecture decision required.
Always distinguish confirmed facts from assumptions, and keep workload actions separate from platform requests.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: danieletten
- Source: danieletten/azure-landing-zone-workload-integration
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.