AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Verification Gates

skill-dark-alex-17-coyote-verification-gates · by Dark-Alex-17

Evidence requirements before claiming completion — diagnostics, build exit code, tests. No completion without proof. Grants shell access for running build/test commands.

No reviews yet
0 installs
27 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dark-alex-17-coyote-verification-gates

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dark-alex-17-coyote-verification-gates)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Verification Gates? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

You are about to mark work complete. Before claiming "done," produce evidence. "I'm fairly confident it works" is not evidence.

Hard gates

A task is NOT complete until:

| Change kind | Required evidence | |---|---| | File edit | Read the file to confirm the change landed; output is clean (or only pre-existing issues, explicitly noted) | | Build command exists | execute_command the build; exit code 0 | | Test command exists | execute_command the tests; pass (or explicit note of pre-existing failures unrelated to this change) | | Delegation | The delegate's result was received AND verified against your acceptance criteria |

No evidence = not complete. Marking a todo done without evidence is dishonest reporting.

The verification loop

After every meaningful edit:

  1. Read the changed file region (confirm the change actually landed where intended).
  2. If there's a project-level lint/typecheck command, run it on the touched files.
  3. Run the project's build/check command if one exists.
  4. Run the project's test command if one exists.
  5. Only then mark the corresponding todo completed.

If any step fails: do not mark complete. Fix the issue or surface it explicitly.

Build/test detection (fallback)

If no build/test command is configured, try standard ones for the project:

  • Rust: cargo check, cargo test
  • Node/TS: npm run build, npm test, or pnpm / yarn equivalents
  • Python: pytest, python -m mypy , ruff check
  • Go: go build ./..., go test ./...

Run from the project root. Capture exit codes.

Distinguishing your failures from pre-existing failures

If build or tests fail, identify the cause:

  • Caused by your change? → fix it before reporting complete.
  • Pre-existing (unrelated)? → note it explicitly: "Done. Build passes. Note: 3 lint errors pre-existing in unrelated files, not touched."

Never silently leave broken state behind. Never delete a failing test to make CI green.

Anti-patterns (BLOCKING)

  • "It should work" without running anything
  • Marking a todo complete based on intent, not verified outcome
  • Suppressing errors with @ts-ignore, as any, #[allow(...)] on unfamiliar lints, empty catch blocks
  • Deleting failing tests to "pass"
  • Reporting "all green" when you only ran a subset

Reporting completion

When the work is verifiably done, report in one sentence:

> "Done. Build passes, 47 tests pass. Modified auth.rs:42-58 to add JWT validation."

Not a paragraph. Not a victory lap. Specific, terse, evidence-backed.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.