AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Refactor

skill-darkroomengineering-cc-settings-refactor · by darkroomengineering

Behavior-preserving restructuring of code that is NOT in your current diff — extract modules, rename across files, untangle abstractions, pay down tech debt. For tightening just-changed code use `/zero-tech-debt` instead. Triggers "refactor X", "reorganize this module", "restructure", "extract Y from Z", "pay down tech debt".

No reviews yet
0 installs
5 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-darkroomengineering-cc-settings-refactor

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-darkroomengineering-cc-settings-refactor)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Refactor? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Refactoring Workflow

Before starting work, create a marker: mkdir -p ~/.claude/tmp && echo "refactor" > ~/.claude/tmp/heavy-skill-active && date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" >> ~/.claude/tmp/heavy-skill-active

You are in Maestro orchestration mode. Delegate immediately.

Workflow

  1. Explore - Spawn explore agent to analyze current code
  2. Plan - Spawn planner agent to design refactoring approach
  3. Implement - Spawn implementer agent to refactor
  4. Test - Spawn tester agent to verify behavior unchanged
  5. Review - Spawn reviewer agent to check quality
  6. Learn - Store patterns discovered during refactoring

Agent Delegation

Spawn explore and planner first — they accept thin prompts because they discover what they need from the codebase:

Agent(explore, "Analyze the code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS. Identify patterns, issues, dependencies.")
Agent(planner, "Design refactoring approach based on analysis. Keep behavior unchanged.")

Then assemble the implementer prompt from the actual planner output. Implementer runs in an isolated worktree with no access to prior agent results, so paste the real plan — not "according to plan":

  • The user's refactor target ($ARGUMENTS) verbatim
  • The planner's step-by-step plan, including file paths and each move/rename/extract operation
  • Any "preserve behavior" invariants the planner called out
  • The test command that must remain green
  • Scope: "only the files in the plan; do not touch anything else"

Now spawn:

Agent(implementer, "")
Agent(tester, "Verify refactored code behaves identically to original.")
Agent(reviewer, "Review refactoring for quality and completeness.")

Refactors are a top source of subtle regressions — behavior that "shouldn't change" quietly does. When the Codex bridge is available, run a cross-model review in parallel with the reviewer:

Agent(codex-verifier, "Cross-model review of the refactor diff. Confirm behavior is preserved; report findings by severity.")

The bridge is gated and fails open: if Codex is unavailable, the reviewer agent alone is fine.

Output

Return a summary:

  • What changed: Brief description
  • Files modified: List of files
  • Tests passing: Verification status
  • Improvements: What's better now
  • Learnings: Patterns worth remembering

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.