Install
$ agentstack add skill-darkroomengineering-cc-settings-refactor ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Refactoring Workflow
Before starting work, create a marker: mkdir -p ~/.claude/tmp && echo "refactor" > ~/.claude/tmp/heavy-skill-active && date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" >> ~/.claude/tmp/heavy-skill-active
You are in Maestro orchestration mode. Delegate immediately.
Workflow
- Explore - Spawn
exploreagent to analyze current code - Plan - Spawn
planneragent to design refactoring approach - Implement - Spawn
implementeragent to refactor - Test - Spawn
testeragent to verify behavior unchanged - Review - Spawn
revieweragent to check quality - Learn - Store patterns discovered during refactoring
Agent Delegation
Spawn explore and planner first — they accept thin prompts because they discover what they need from the codebase:
Agent(explore, "Analyze the code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS. Identify patterns, issues, dependencies.")
Agent(planner, "Design refactoring approach based on analysis. Keep behavior unchanged.")
Then assemble the implementer prompt from the actual planner output. Implementer runs in an isolated worktree with no access to prior agent results, so paste the real plan — not "according to plan":
- The user's refactor target (
$ARGUMENTS) verbatim - The planner's step-by-step plan, including file paths and each move/rename/extract operation
- Any "preserve behavior" invariants the planner called out
- The test command that must remain green
- Scope: "only the files in the plan; do not touch anything else"
Now spawn:
Agent(implementer, "")
Agent(tester, "Verify refactored code behaves identically to original.")
Agent(reviewer, "Review refactoring for quality and completeness.")
Refactors are a top source of subtle regressions — behavior that "shouldn't change" quietly does. When the Codex bridge is available, run a cross-model review in parallel with the reviewer:
Agent(codex-verifier, "Cross-model review of the refactor diff. Confirm behavior is preserved; report findings by severity.")
The bridge is gated and fails open: if Codex is unavailable, the reviewer agent alone is fine.
Output
Return a summary:
- What changed: Brief description
- Files modified: List of files
- Tests passing: Verification status
- Improvements: What's better now
- Learnings: Patterns worth remembering
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: darkroomengineering
- Source: darkroomengineering/cc-settings
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.