AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Author And Verify Implementation Plan

skill-dasdigitalemomentum-opencode-processing-skills-author-and-verify-implementation-plan · by DasDigitaleMomentum

Author and verify per-phase implementation plans by cross-checking the gated phase intent against the current source code and existing docs inventories.

No reviews yet
0 installs
30 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dasdigitalemomentum-opencode-processing-skills-author-and-verify-implementation-plan

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dasdigitalemomentum-opencode-processing-skills-author-and-verify-implementation-plan)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Author And Verify Implementation Plan? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skill: Author and Verify Implementation Plan

This skill standardizes the second pass between planning and execution:

  • It authors or refines plans//implementation/phase-N-impl.md
  • It verifies the plan against the current source code (and uses docs/** inventories when present)

This skill exists to prevent “hand-wavy” implementation plans and reduce drift between phase intent and repo reality.


When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • The phase is already gated (scope/DoD decided in plan.md + phases/phase-N.md).
  • You want the “how” (implementation/phase-N-impl.md) to be grounded in current code.
  • You plan to delegate execution later via execute-work-package.

Do not use this skill to:

  • Change the gated phase intent/scope (that is primary work via update-plan).
  • Generate documentation (use generate-docs / update-docs).

Execution Model

Roles

  • Primary (maintainer)
  • Owns phase gating and decisions.
  • Delegates authoring/verification of the implementation plan when helpful.
  • Reviews the resulting implementation plan for scope compliance.
  • Subagent (doc-explorer)
  • Reads: phase + existing implementation plan (if any) + relevant docs + relevant code.
  • Writes: plans/**/implementation/phase-N-impl.md.

Routing Matrix (Who does what)

  • Writes: plans//implementation/phase-N-impl.md (authoring/refinement grounded against current code).
  • Does NOT write: plans//plan.md or plans//phases/** (phase intent/scope/DoD remain gated by the primary).
  • Primary: owns phase gating; reviews impl-plan for scope compliance.
  • doc-explorer: performs the author+verify pass and writes the impl-plan.
  • implementer: not used for plan artifacts in this skill.

Why plans/ and docs/ matter

  • plans/ is the gated source of truth for intent/scope/DoD.
  • docs/ (if present) provides curated inventories (modules/features/symbols) to navigate quickly.

Workflow

0) Inputs (Primary → doc-explorer)

Provide:

  • Plan references:
  • plans//plan.md (recommended: provides global constraints, scope language, and phase table)
  • plans//phases/phase-N.md (required: gated intent/DoD for the target phase)
  • plans//implementation/phase-N-impl.md (if exists)
  • plans//implementation/phase-(N-1)-impl.md (optional: when the phase builds on previous technical decisions)
  • plans//implementation/phase-(N+1)-impl.md (optional: when this phase must align with a later interface)
  • Docs references (optional but recommended):
  • docs/overview.md
  • docs/modules/*.md
  • docs/features/*.md
  • Any constraints that must be preserved (naming conventions, verify command preference, etc.).

1) Author + verify

doc-explorer:

  1. Reads the plan (for global context) and the phase intent/DoD.
  2. Locates the relevant code areas using docs inventories and targeted code search.
  3. Writes/updates the implementation plan using the template.
  4. Ensures the plan is concrete:
  • references real file paths/symbols
  • includes a single proposed verify command (or preserves the given one)
  • captures mismatches as “Reality Check” notes

If the phase depends on previous phases, doc-explorer should read the necessary prior implementation plans to keep continuity.

2) Primary review

Primary confirms:

  • The implementation plan stays within the gated phase scope.
  • The verify command is appropriate.
  • The “Reality Check” section (if any) is acceptable.

Output Contract

The generated/updated plans//implementation/phase-N-impl.md MUST include:

  • A Required Context section with specific files.
  • Implementation Steps that reference concrete targets (files/symbols/components).
  • A single verify command in the Testing Plan that exercises changed behavior.
  • A Test Integrity Constraints subsection identifying which existing tests are affected and how.
  • A Reality Check section:
  • code anchors (files/symbols) used to ground the plan
  • mismatches or open questions (if discovered)

The implementation plan must follow the canonical headings and frontmatter keys from the bundled template.


Rules

  • Skill-first: when invoked, follow this workflow and template.
  • Sequential processing only. When authoring implementation plans for multiple phases, process them strictly one at a time (phase 1, then phase 2, etc.). Parallel authoring causes drift – later phases cannot account for decisions made in earlier ones.
  • Consistency check and fix after completion. Once all phase implementation plans are authored, verify cross-phase consistency: shared interfaces, naming, data flow assumptions, and dependency ordering. Fix any inconsistencies directly in the implementation plans – the agent is authoring them, so they should be delivered in a consistent state. Only flag issues under "Reality Check" that require a user decision or cannot be resolved without changing the gated phase scope.
  • Do not change phase scope/DoD; record mismatches under "Reality Check" and raise to the primary.
  • Prefer minimal, accurate plan updates over speculative completeness.

Templates

  • tpl-implementation-plan.md — canonical implementation plan format with “Reality Check” grounding section
  • tpl-author-and-verify-implementation-plan-prompt.md — Primary → doc-explorer delegation prompt

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.