AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Fr Acceptance

skill-derio-net-super-fr-fr-acceptance · by derio-net

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
2 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-derio-net-super-fr-fr-acceptance

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Fr Acceptance? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

fr-acceptance

The matrix (docs/acceptance/matrix.yaml) is the registry of business-level acceptance tests × verification levels (unit/api/int/ui) × automation status. This skill drives the agent-side work; the mechanics live in the CLI.

Announce at start: "I'm using fr-acceptance to work the acceptance matrix."

Statuses — the honesty scale

ci / scheduled = automated, cannot drift · skipped = verification exists but not in CI (warning, backfill owed) · not-implemented = nothing yet (warning) · failing = known red, fr acceptance check exits 2 and CI fails. Statuses move explicitly, never silently. The drift channel is precisely the hand-tracked claims — when in doubt between ci and skipped, choose skipped. Do not inflate coverage; the operator audits statuses at review.

Backfill an existing repo

  1. fr acceptance init (idempotent) if the repo has no matrix — scaffolds

matrix + CI workflow + backfill rule + gitignore entry.

  1. fr acceptance backfill — emits the inventory (Test Plan specs not yet

cited, plans without linked rows, test-tree hints) + this protocol.

  1. DRAFT rows — one row per business acceptance, not per test — via

fr acceptance add --id --capability --acceptance "" --origin : --level unit=: --status --notes "". Never hand-edit YAML shapes; add validates and appends.

  1. fr acceptance check → fix errors (unresolved refs, staleness, schema),

re-run until only honest warnings remain.

  1. Open a review PR: the operator audits every status.

Flip statuses (execution hand-off)

When a plan phase carrying acceptance: [row-ids] completes, flip those rows up the ladder (not-implementedskippedci/scheduled), citing the test refs that justify the move in levels and notes. fr plan edit --complete-phase warns on unflipped rows — fix or record why in the completion note.

Mid-flight additions (encouraged, then defended)

During planning or implementation, ADD a row the moment a legitimate business need surfaces (a missed edge, a review-found failure mode, a constraint turned load-bearing) — never silently widen or narrow scope. Every addition is presented in the PR body ("rows added since brainstorm", generated via fr acceptance check --added-since ) with a one-line defense.

Refs and the gate

Refs are :[#Lline|#anchor] — own repo by its own name, sibling repos verified only where a checkout exists (--sibling-root, default ..). Archived specs auto-resolve (specs/implemented/specs/) — check warns, never errors, on a moved ref. fr acceptance report renders the HTML; fr acceptance status is the terminal nag; fr acceptance digest feeds the weekly "Acceptance debt" issue upsert.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.