AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Auth Review

skill-descope-skills-auth-review · by descope

Static security review for authentication and authorization vulnerabilities. Use when the user invokes /auth-review, asks to audit auth, find identity breaches, review access control, hunt for IDOR/BOLA, or check authorization. Framework- and vendor-agnostic. Enumerates every route/endpoint, builds an authorization matrix, applies a vulnerability catalog, and writes a triage report ready to turn…

No reviews yet
0 installs
8 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-descope-skills-auth-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-descope-skills-auth-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Auth Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Auth Review

Perform a static, read-only security review of authentication and authorization in the current codebase. Framework- and vendor-agnostic. Output: a triage report in ./auth-review/ with findings ready to file as issues or PRs.

When to Use

  • User invokes /auth-review.
  • Requests like "audit auth", "find authz bugs", "review access control", "check for IDOR", "identity security review".
  • Pre-release hardening or post-incident forensic code review focused on identity.

Workflow

Run these phases in order. Do not skip ahead.

Phase 1 — Enumerate every entrypoint

Identify every code path reachable by an external or semi-trusted caller. See references/enumeration.md for exhaustive patterns. A single repo often mixes HTTP, GraphQL, WebSocket, queue consumers, serverless handlers, and admin CLIs — list them all.

Deliverable: an Endpoint Inventory table: method, path / trigger, handler (file:line), auth required? (y/n/unknown), roles or scopes, notes.

Reconcile against router files, OpenAPI specs, and GraphQL schemas before moving on.

Phase 2 — Build the authorization matrix

For each endpoint answer: who should reach this, and what does the code actually enforce? Use references/authz-matrix.md to infer the expected principal from conventions and classify gaps.

Deliverable: an Authorization Matrix table: endpoint, expected principal, enforced check (file:line), gap.

Phase 3 — Apply the vulnerability catalog

Walk references/vulnerability-catalog.md category by category. For each, run the detection heuristics, then read the matched files to confirm. Never flag from a grep hit alone.

Before calling a check missing, confirm no upstream middleware, decorator, guard, filter, interceptor, framework default, or reverse proxy enforces it. Trace at least one concrete caller path end-to-end for each finding. If a check is conditional, record the condition and whether an attacker controls it.

Phase 4 — Write the report

Create ./auth-review/ if absent. Write to ./auth-review/report-YYYY-MM-DD.md (append -HHMM if one already exists for today). Use the structure in references/report-template.md.

The report must include:

  1. Executive summary with counts by severity.
  2. Endpoint inventory (Phase 1).
  3. Authorization matrix (Phase 2).
  4. Findings — each with title, severity, CWE, file:line, evidence, exploit reasoning, remediation.
  5. "Issues to file" — findings pre-formatted as ready-to-paste issue bodies.
  6. Open questions the maintainer must answer.

After writing, summarize severity counts to the user and point at the file path. Do not create issues or PRs.

Severity Scale

| Level | Meaning | |--------|---------| | High | Exploitable by unauthenticated or low-privilege attacker; leads to account takeover, data breach, privilege escalation, or tenant crossing. | | Medium | Requires specific conditions, partial impact, or defense-in-depth failure. | | Low | Hardening recommendation; minor information disclosure; missing best practice. |

Always include a CWE ID (e.g., CWE-287, CWE-639, CWE-862, CWE-863). Use identifiers from references/vulnerability-catalog.md — do not invent IDs.

DO NOT

  • DO NOT modify source code. This skill is read-only.
  • DO NOT execute the application, run network probes, or make outbound requests.
  • DO NOT report a finding without a file.ext:line reference and evidence snippet.
  • DO NOT flag a missing check before confirming no upstream middleware, guard, decorator, or proxy enforces it.
  • DO NOT invent CWE IDs, CVSS scores, or framework behaviors — if unsure, mark the finding "unconfirmed" and move it to Open Questions.
  • DO NOT include secrets, tokens, private keys, or real user data in the report. Redact as [REDACTED].
  • DO NOT commit the report to git unless the user asks.
  • DO NOT create GitHub issues or PRs directly. Output issue-ready text and let the user file them.
  • DO NOT stop after finding one bug. Enumerate everything, then report.
  • DO NOT trust code comments or documentation over the code itself. A comment saying "admin only" is not a security control.

References

  • references/enumeration.md — entrypoint patterns across HTTP, GraphQL, WebSocket, RPC, serverless, and background stacks.
  • references/vulnerability-catalog.md — full taxonomy with detection heuristics, CWE IDs, and fixes.
  • references/authz-matrix.md — matrix schema and expected-principal inference rules.
  • references/report-template.md — exact report structure and issue-body format.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.