AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Test Driven Development

skill-developersglobal-ai-agent-skills-test-driven-development · by DevelopersGlobal

Red-green-refactor cycle with meaningful coverage. Tests are written before implementation. Coverage is a side effect of good tests, not the goal.

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-developersglobal-ai-agent-skills-test-driven-development

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Test Driven Development? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Overview

TDD is the discipline of writing a failing test before writing implementation code. It forces you to think about the interface before the internals, produces tests that actually test behavior (not just coverage), and gives you a safety net for every refactor.

AI agents skip tests constantly. This skill makes tests non-optional.

When to Use

  • Starting any new feature or function
  • Fixing any bug (write a test that reproduces the bug first)
  • Refactoring existing code (ensure test coverage before you start)

Process

Step 1: Write a Failing Test (Red)

  1. Write a test for the behavior you want — before writing implementation.
  2. The test should describe what the code does, not how:
  • test("returns 404 when user not found")
  • test("calls findById with the user id")
  1. Run the test. Confirm it fails for the right reason (not a syntax error — a missing implementation).

Verify: Test runs and fails with a clear "not implemented" or "undefined" error.

Step 2: Write Minimum Code (Green)

  1. Write the minimum implementation to make the test pass.
  2. Do not write more than the test requires — resist the urge to add logic for future cases.
  3. Run the test. Confirm it passes.

Verify: All tests pass. No new tests added yet.

Step 3: Refactor (Refactor)

  1. Now clean up the implementation — no new behavior, only improved structure.
  2. Run tests after every refactoring step — do not batch refactors.
  3. If tests break during refactor: revert immediately, refactor more carefully.

Verify: Tests still pass after refactor. Code is cleaner.

Step 4: Repeat for Each Behavior

  1. Repeat steps 1–3 for each distinct behavior of the feature.
  2. Test pyramid: many unit tests, fewer integration tests, minimal end-to-end tests.

Step 5: Coverage Sanity Check

  1. Run coverage report. Flag any critical paths with 0% coverage.
  2. Do NOT chase a coverage number — write tests for behaviors that matter.

Verify: All happy paths and key edge cases have tests. Coverage report reviewed.

Common Rationalizations (and Rebuttals)

| Excuse | Rebuttal | |--------|----------| | "I'll add tests after" | After never comes. And after-the-fact tests test your implementation, not the behavior. | | "This code is too simple to test" | Simple code breaks in unexpected ways when requirements change. | | "Integration tests are enough" | Unit tests catch bugs faster, run faster, and localize failures better. | | "We don't have time for TDD" | You have time for the bug investigation that comes without TDD? |

Red Flags

  • Tests were written after the implementation
  • Tests test internal implementation details (private methods, DB queries) rather than behavior
  • "Happy path only" test coverage
  • Tests pass even when you break the implementation (mocked away the real behavior)
  • Coverage target hit by testing trivial getters/setters

Verification

  • [ ] Tests written before implementation (or alongside for bug fixes)
  • [ ] Each test describes a specific behavior
  • [ ] Red-green-refactor cycle followed
  • [ ] All tests pass
  • [ ] Key edge cases covered (empty input, null, boundary values)
  • [ ] Coverage report reviewed for critical path gaps

References

  • [debugging-methodology skill](../debugging-methodology/SKILL.md)
  • [references/testing-patterns.md](../../references/testing-patterns.md)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.