Install
$ agentstack add skill-devnomad-byte-techneering-assemble ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Assemble: Subagent-Driven Execution
Execute plans by dispatching a fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.
Core Principle
FRESH SUBAGENT PER TASK + TWO-STAGE REVIEW = HIGH QUALITY.
Never skip reviews. Never reuse context between tasks.
Model Selection
Use the least powerful model that can handle each role:
- Mechanical tasks (1-2 files, clear specs): fast/cheap model
- Integration tasks (multi-file, debugging): standard model
- Architecture/review tasks: most capable model
Steps
Step 1: Read Plan and Extract Tasks
Read the implementation plan. Extract all tasks and create a todo list.
Step 2: Execute Tasks (Per-Task Loop)
For each task:
2a. Dispatch Implementer Subagent
Frontend Detection: Before dispatching, check if the task involves frontend/UI work. Match against the Frontend Detection Rules in tn:compass (keywords: page/component/UI/layout/style/React/Vue/CSS/Tailwind/form/button/animation etc.). If matched, invoke tn:craft first to get aesthetic guidance, then include that guidance in the implementer prompt.
Use ./implementer-prompt.md template. Provide full task text (never make subagent read the plan file).
One commit per task: the implementer commits its own work before returning (the review stages below compare that commit's diff). Each task = one commit, so 2b/2c reviews have a clean BASESHA→HEADSHA range per task.
Handle status:
- DONE: Proceed to spec compliance review
- DONEWITHCONCERNS: Read concerns, address if needed, proceed
- NEEDS_CONTEXT: Provide missing context and re-dispatch
- BLOCKED: Assess blocker, provide context or re-dispatch with better model
Never ignore an escalation or force the same model to retry without changes.
2b. Dispatch Spec Reviewer Subagent
Use ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md template. Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less).
- If issues → implementer fixes → re-review
- Don't skip the re-review
2c. Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer Subagent
Use ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md template. Only after spec compliance passes.
- If issues → implementer fixes → re-review
- Don't skip the re-review
2d. Mark Task Complete
Mark the task as complete in the todo list and in techneering/changes//tasks.md.
Step 3: Parallel Scheduling
Analyze task dependencies, build DAG:
- Independent tasks can be dispatched in parallel (max 3 concurrent)
- Dependent tasks run in topological order
- Avoid resource conflicts between parallel tasks
Red Flags
| Thought | Reality | |---------|---------| | "Skip review to speed up" | Review is quality assurance, not an optional step | | "Let the subagent read the plan file" | Must provide full text — don't make subagent read files | | "Ignore the subagent's BLOCKED" | BLOCKED = needs your help, not "try again" | | "Run code quality review before spec review" | Order is irreversible: spec first, then quality |
Quick Reference
| Dimension | Key point | |-----------|-----------| | Flow | implementer → spec review → code quality review → next task | | Subagents | Independent per task, don't inherit session context | | Parallel | Independent tasks can run parallel, max 3 concurrent | | Templates | implementer-prompt.md / spec-reviewer-prompt.md / code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md | | Path placeholder | Always use techneering/changes// |
Next Step
When done:
- Normal case (all tasks complete) → invoke
tn:gateto run test verification - Issue encountered → invoke
tn:diagnosefor systematic debugging - User requests stop → end the current flow
Guardrails
- Never skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
- Never start code quality review before spec compliance passes
- Never move to next task while either review has open issues
- Never make subagent read plan file — provide full text instead
- Never ignore subagent questions or escalations
- If reviewer finds issues: implementer fixes → reviewer re-reviews → repeat until approved
- Follow tn:redgreen for each task and tn:diagnose if issues arise
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: devnomad-byte
- Source: devnomad-byte/techneering
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.