AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Assemble

skill-devnomad-byte-techneering-assemble · by devnomad-byte

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

No reviews yet
0 installs
29 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-devnomad-byte-techneering-assemble

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-devnomad-byte-techneering-assemble)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Assemble? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Assemble: Subagent-Driven Execution

Execute plans by dispatching a fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.

Core Principle

FRESH SUBAGENT PER TASK + TWO-STAGE REVIEW = HIGH QUALITY.
Never skip reviews. Never reuse context between tasks.

Model Selection

Use the least powerful model that can handle each role:

  • Mechanical tasks (1-2 files, clear specs): fast/cheap model
  • Integration tasks (multi-file, debugging): standard model
  • Architecture/review tasks: most capable model

Steps

Step 1: Read Plan and Extract Tasks

Read the implementation plan. Extract all tasks and create a todo list.

Step 2: Execute Tasks (Per-Task Loop)

For each task:

2a. Dispatch Implementer Subagent

Frontend Detection: Before dispatching, check if the task involves frontend/UI work. Match against the Frontend Detection Rules in tn:compass (keywords: page/component/UI/layout/style/React/Vue/CSS/Tailwind/form/button/animation etc.). If matched, invoke tn:craft first to get aesthetic guidance, then include that guidance in the implementer prompt.

Use ./implementer-prompt.md template. Provide full task text (never make subagent read the plan file).

One commit per task: the implementer commits its own work before returning (the review stages below compare that commit's diff). Each task = one commit, so 2b/2c reviews have a clean BASESHA→HEADSHA range per task.

Handle status:

  • DONE: Proceed to spec compliance review
  • DONEWITHCONCERNS: Read concerns, address if needed, proceed
  • NEEDS_CONTEXT: Provide missing context and re-dispatch
  • BLOCKED: Assess blocker, provide context or re-dispatch with better model

Never ignore an escalation or force the same model to retry without changes.

2b. Dispatch Spec Reviewer Subagent

Use ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md template. Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less).

  • If issues → implementer fixes → re-review
  • Don't skip the re-review
2c. Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer Subagent

Use ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md template. Only after spec compliance passes.

  • If issues → implementer fixes → re-review
  • Don't skip the re-review
2d. Mark Task Complete

Mark the task as complete in the todo list and in techneering/changes//tasks.md.

Step 3: Parallel Scheduling

Analyze task dependencies, build DAG:

  • Independent tasks can be dispatched in parallel (max 3 concurrent)
  • Dependent tasks run in topological order
  • Avoid resource conflicts between parallel tasks

Red Flags

| Thought | Reality | |---------|---------| | "Skip review to speed up" | Review is quality assurance, not an optional step | | "Let the subagent read the plan file" | Must provide full text — don't make subagent read files | | "Ignore the subagent's BLOCKED" | BLOCKED = needs your help, not "try again" | | "Run code quality review before spec review" | Order is irreversible: spec first, then quality |

Quick Reference

| Dimension | Key point | |-----------|-----------| | Flow | implementer → spec review → code quality review → next task | | Subagents | Independent per task, don't inherit session context | | Parallel | Independent tasks can run parallel, max 3 concurrent | | Templates | implementer-prompt.md / spec-reviewer-prompt.md / code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md | | Path placeholder | Always use techneering/changes// |

Next Step

When done:

  • Normal case (all tasks complete) → invoke tn:gate to run test verification
  • Issue encountered → invoke tn:diagnose for systematic debugging
  • User requests stop → end the current flow

Guardrails

  • Never skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
  • Never start code quality review before spec compliance passes
  • Never move to next task while either review has open issues
  • Never make subagent read plan file — provide full text instead
  • Never ignore subagent questions or escalations
  • If reviewer finds issues: implementer fixes → reviewer re-reviews → repeat until approved
  • Follow tn:redgreen for each task and tn:diagnose if issues arise

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.