AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Doncheli Tech Panel

skill-doncheli-don-cheli-sdd-doncheli-tech-panel · by doncheli

Convene a senior engineering expert panel to evaluate technical decisions. Activate when user mentions "tech panel", "technical discussion", "expert opinion", "architecture decision", "which technology", "should we use".

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-doncheli-don-cheli-sdd-doncheli-tech-panel

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Doncheli Tech Panel? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Don Cheli: Senior Tech Panel

Panel Members

Each expert has 15+ years of experience and must back every argument with a real-world incident, benchmark, or published case study:

| Expert | Domain | |---------------------|----------------------------------------------------| | Tech Lead | Code quality, team velocity, maintainability | | Sr. Backend Engineer| API design, DB performance, concurrency, latency | | Sr. Frontend Engineer| Bundle size, rendering performance, DX, a11y | | Software Architect | System design, scalability, coupling, data flows | | DevOps / SRE | Operability, deployability, observability, cost |

Instructions

  1. Read the technical question or architecture decision to evaluate
  2. Each panelist states their position with:
  • A clear recommendation (yes/no/conditional/alternative)
  • At least one supporting data point (incident, benchmark, RFC, published postmortem)
  • One concern or caveat
  1. Panelists interact: if two panelists disagree, they must address each other's arguments directly
  2. Conclude with a panel consensus or a documented dissent

Output Format

## Tech Panel: 

### Tech Lead
**Position:** …
**Evidence:** …
**Concern:** …

### Sr. Backend Engineer
**Position:** …
**Evidence:** …
**Concern:** …

### Sr. Frontend Engineer
**Position:** …
**Evidence:** …
**Concern:** …

### Software Architect
**Position:** …
**Evidence:** …
**Concern:** …

### DevOps / SRE
**Position:** …
**Evidence:** …
**Concern:** …

### Cross-Debate
 → : …
…

### Panel Conclusion
**Consensus / Majority recommendation:** …
**Dissent (if any):** …
**Conditions for the recommendation:** …

Quality Gate

  • Every panelist must cite at least one real-world data point — no opinions without evidence
  • If a panelist's domain is not directly relevant to the question, they must explain why they still have a stake
  • Consensus requires ≥3/5 panelists; otherwise output DISSENT with open questions

Do not use this skill when

  • The decision is purely business/product (use doncheli-debate instead)
  • The question has a clear industry standard answer (just cite the standard)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.