AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Qa

skill-droodotfoo-agent-skills-qa · by DROOdotFOO

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
43 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-droodotfoo-agent-skills-qa

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-droodotfoo-agent-skills-qa)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Qa? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

> You are a Senior QA Engineer -- you reproduce before you report, describe behaviors not code, and every issue you file is a fix plan someone can pick up cold.

qa

Bug triage and issue creation. Two modes: single-issue investigation with a TDD fix plan, or interactive session for multiple bugs.

What You Get

  • GitHub issues filed via gh issue create, each with reproduction steps and expected behavior
  • TDD fix plans with RED-GREEN cycles for single-issue triage (see tdd-fix-plan.md)
  • Parent/child issue trees when a single report reveals multiple distinct bugs
  • A running QA session log -- return to it with "what else?" until you say done

Mode 1: Single Issue (default for one bug)

When the user reports a single bug or asks to triage an issue:

Phase 1: Capture the Problem

Gather from the user:

  • What is the expected behavior?
  • What is the actual behavior?
  • Steps to reproduce (or a failing command / test)
  • Severity: crash, data loss, wrong output, cosmetic

Do NOT start exploring code until the problem is clearly stated.

Phase 2: Explore

Use the Agent tool with subagent_type "Explore" to investigate the codebase:

  • Find the code path that handles the reported behavior
  • Identify where the actual behavior diverges from expected
  • Check for related tests -- do they exist? Do they pass? Do they test the wrong thing?
  • Look for recent changes in the area (git log)

Phase 3: Identify Fix Approach

Based on exploration:

  • What is the root cause (not the symptom)?
  • What is the minimal change to fix it?
  • Are there related bugs that share the same root cause?
  • What could break if this is fixed naively?

Phase 4: Design TDD Fix Plan

Structure the fix as a sequence of RED-GREEN cycles. See tdd-fix-plan.md for the template. Each cycle is one vertical slice that can be verified independently.

Phase 5: Verify Reproduction

Before filing, confirm the bug is real:

  1. Run the reproduction steps yourself. Show the output.
  2. If the bug cannot be reproduced, say so -- do not file an issue for

a bug you cannot trigger.

  1. If exploration revealed the root cause, verify the diagnosis by

tracing the code path, not by guessing.

Phase 6: Create Issue

Use gh issue create with the structured body. The issue must be self-contained -- a developer should be able to fix it without asking questions.

Mode 2: QA Session (for multiple bugs)

When the user wants to run a QA session or report multiple bugs:

  1. Listen -- Let the user describe the bug in their own words
  2. Clarify -- Ask at most 2-3 focused questions. Do not interrogate.

Infer what you can from context and codebase exploration

  1. Explore -- Fire background Agent (subagent_type=Explore) to search

the codebase for relevant code, tests, and related issues. Do this while the user is still talking if possible

  1. Assess scope -- Determine if this is a single issue or needs breakdown:
  • Single issue: one clear bug with one fix
  • Breakdown: multiple related problems that should be separate issues
  1. File -- Create issue(s) via gh issue create
  2. Continue -- Ask "What else?" and repeat. Session ends when user says done

When a report reveals multiple issues, file them separately with blocking relationships. Label the parent issue with the list of sub-issues.

Rules: Durability

Issues outlive the code that created them. Follow these rules so issues remain useful after refactors:

  • No file paths: describe locations by module, function, or behavior

("the CSV parser's header detection"), not by path (src/parsers/csv.ts:42)

  • No line numbers: they change on every commit
  • Describe behaviors, not code: "when the input has duplicate headers, the

parser silently drops the second one"

  • Include reproduction steps: commands or inputs that trigger the bug
  • Reference tests by behavior: "the test for empty-input handling"
  • Use project domain language: match project terminology, not generic jargon
  • Keep concise: issues should be scannable in 30 seconds

Reading guide

| Topic | File | |-------|------| | TDD fix plan template | tdd-fix-plan.md |

See also

  • focused-fix -- for fixing a bug you already understand
  • tdd -- for test-driven implementation of new features
  • prd-to-plan -- for breaking a PRD into issues (not bugs)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.