Install
$ agentstack add skill-dtiger1889-ops-claude-harness-toolbox-plain ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
plain -- translate a dense/jargon response into plain English
The standing rule this enforces: understandable, digestible English in chat -- every self-invented code glossed in plain words, nothing buried under process narration. It keeps getting violated -- responses come back stuffed with filing codes (F027, B13, PTT, a def_hash...), unexpanded acronyms, and compressed noun-stacks that are a wall to read. This skill is the fix: take that response and SAY IT AGAIN in plain, conversational, generous English.
This is the ANTI-terse skill -- the opposite of /breakdown. Length is fine; losing meaning is not.
What to translate
Default target: the immediately previous assistant message. If the user pasted text or @-mentioned a file/block, translate that instead. If it is ambiguous which, ask once.
How to do it
- RESOLVE every code, tag, and acronym to its real meaning -- do NOT guess. When a
filing code / phase name / gate name / hash appears, look it up in the project files (e.g. findings.md, CHECKPOINT.md, the relevant spec) and state what it actually IS in people-words. If you genuinely cannot find what a code refers to, say "I couldn't find what X refers to" -- never bluff a meaning.
- Re-express, don't summarize. Keep ALL the substance. This is a translation, not a
trimmed recap; dropping detail to be shorter is the failure mode.
- Unpack compressed noun-stacks and nested clauses into short, ordinary sentences.
- Introduce NO new shorthand -- no codes, no project jargon. If a technical term is
genuinely unavoidable, define it inline the first time you use it.
- Structure for reading -- short paragraphs or a plain list, not a block.
Rules
- Plain, conversational English, structured to be digestible: answer first, short
paragraphs, expansive enough to define every term -- never a wall of text.
- Never invent a meaning for a code you couldn't resolve.
- Don't add new analysis, opinions, or next steps -- just make the existing content legible.
If the user wants more, they'll ask.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: dtiger1889-ops
- Source: dtiger1889-ops/claude-harness-toolbox
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.