Install
$ agentstack add skill-dtiger1889-ops-claude-harness-toolbox-redteam ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
redteam -- single-frame adversarial pass
Grounded in the maintainer's session-transcript crawl: the recurring friction is "the model commits to one answer inline and the user has to push back." This skill front-runs that push-back. It is ONE frame (adversarial), not five -- so it costs roughly 1x, far less than /fanout.
Step 1 -- get the target
The claim / plan / answer to attack, from an @-mention, a path, or the prior turn. If it is ambiguous which claim to attack, ask -- once.
Step 1.5 -- orient if the target is a project artifact (mandatory)
If the target is (or names) a file under a project folder -- a spec, plan, decision doc, code file -- read that project's CHECKPOINT.md to EOF first (and its CLAUDE.md if not already surfaced). The SessionStart receipt is a byte/line count, NOT the file; a preview is not a read. Attacking a plan blind to project state manufactures flaws the CHECKPOINT already resolved and misses the real constraints (deadlines, funding/sequencing gates, what's been tried/rejected) that actually sink it. Fold those constraints into the attack. Skip only when the target is genuinely project-free.
Step 2 -- attack it. Assume it is wrong. Output:
- Strongest case it's wrong -- the most likely fatal flaw, with the mechanism (not a
vague "it might not scale" but how it actually breaks).
- Silent assumption -- the load-bearing thing it takes for granted that, if false,
sinks it.
- The decoy -- if the obvious answer is a trap, name the real one.
- Cheapest disproof -- the quickest concrete check (a command, a file read, a
measurement) that would settle whether the fatal flaw is real, so the attack ends in evidence rather than a debate.
- Verdict -- survives / needs revision / abandon, plus the single most important fix.
Rules
- Do not hedge. Do not soften to be agreeable -- not-agreeing is the entire point.
- If after a genuine attempt the target actually holds, say so plainly and say why; do not
manufacture a flaw to look useful.
- One pass (n=1). For 5-frame breadth, that is /fanout.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: dtiger1889-ops
- Source: dtiger1889-ops/claude-harness-toolbox
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.