AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Redteam

skill-dtiger1889-ops-claude-harness-toolbox-redteam · by dtiger1889-ops

One focused adversarial pass on a claim, plan, or answer (the cheap middle gear between a single-shot answer and the ~7x-token /fanout). Use ONLY when the user types /redteam or says "push back on this" / "red-team this" / "stress-test this". Fires ONE adversarial pass that assumes the target is wrong and hunts the fatal flaw. Do NOT use for 5-way ideation (that is /fanout) or for convergent fact…

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dtiger1889-ops-claude-harness-toolbox-redteam

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dtiger1889-ops-claude-harness-toolbox-redteam)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Redteam? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

redteam -- single-frame adversarial pass

Grounded in the maintainer's session-transcript crawl: the recurring friction is "the model commits to one answer inline and the user has to push back." This skill front-runs that push-back. It is ONE frame (adversarial), not five -- so it costs roughly 1x, far less than /fanout.

Step 1 -- get the target

The claim / plan / answer to attack, from an @-mention, a path, or the prior turn. If it is ambiguous which claim to attack, ask -- once.

Step 1.5 -- orient if the target is a project artifact (mandatory)

If the target is (or names) a file under a project folder -- a spec, plan, decision doc, code file -- read that project's CHECKPOINT.md to EOF first (and its CLAUDE.md if not already surfaced). The SessionStart receipt is a byte/line count, NOT the file; a preview is not a read. Attacking a plan blind to project state manufactures flaws the CHECKPOINT already resolved and misses the real constraints (deadlines, funding/sequencing gates, what's been tried/rejected) that actually sink it. Fold those constraints into the attack. Skip only when the target is genuinely project-free.

Step 2 -- attack it. Assume it is wrong. Output:

  1. Strongest case it's wrong -- the most likely fatal flaw, with the mechanism (not a

vague "it might not scale" but how it actually breaks).

  1. Silent assumption -- the load-bearing thing it takes for granted that, if false,

sinks it.

  1. The decoy -- if the obvious answer is a trap, name the real one.
  2. Cheapest disproof -- the quickest concrete check (a command, a file read, a

measurement) that would settle whether the fatal flaw is real, so the attack ends in evidence rather than a debate.

  1. Verdict -- survives / needs revision / abandon, plus the single most important fix.

Rules

  • Do not hedge. Do not soften to be agreeable -- not-agreeing is the entire point.
  • If after a genuine attempt the target actually holds, say so plainly and say why; do not

manufacture a flaw to look useful.

  • One pass (n=1). For 5-frame breadth, that is /fanout.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.