AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Testing Strategy

skill-dtsong-my-claude-setup-testing-strategy · by dtsong

Use when designing test plans for new features or improving existing test coverage. Covers test pyramid design, coverage targets, quality gates, and test file specifications. Do not use for codebase pattern audits or convention enforcement (use pattern-analysis).

No reviews yet
0 installs
43 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dtsong-my-claude-setup-testing-strategy

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dtsong-my-claude-setup-testing-strategy)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Testing Strategy? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Testing Strategy

Purpose

Design comprehensive test strategies with test pyramid coverage, test file structure, and quality gates.

Scope Constraints

  • Covers test plan design, pyramid layering, coverage targets, and CI quality gates.
  • Does not cover codebase pattern auditing or convention enforcement — hand off to pattern-analysis.
  • Does not cover architectural decisions about system boundaries — hand off to architect department.

Inputs

  • Feature description and scope
  • Existing test infrastructure (framework, runner, coverage tools)
  • CI/CD pipeline details (if relevant)
  • Existing test conventions in the codebase
  • Coverage targets or requirements (if any)

Input Sanitization

No user-provided values are used in commands or file paths. All inputs are treated as read-only analysis targets.

Procedure

Progress Checklist

  • [ ] Step 1: Audit existing test infrastructure
  • [ ] Step 2: Identify testable units
  • [ ] Step 3: Design test pyramid
  • [ ] Step 4: Write test specifications
  • [ ] Step 5: Define coverage targets
  • [ ] Step 6: Plan quality gates

Step 1: Audit Existing Test Infrastructure

  • Test framework (Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, etc.)
  • Test runner and configuration
  • Coverage tools (Istanbul, c8, etc.)
  • CI integration (GitHub Actions, etc.)
  • Existing test patterns (file location, naming, describe/it structure)
  • Existing mocking patterns (jest.mock, vi.mock, MSW, etc.)

Step 2: Identify Testable Units

From the feature, extract:

  • Pure functions and utilities — deterministic, no side effects, easiest to test
  • Data transformations — input/output mapping, validation logic
  • API handlers/endpoints — request/response contracts, error handling
  • UI components — render output, interaction behavior, state changes
  • Integration points — database queries, external API calls, file I/O
  • Business logic — rules, calculations, conditional flows

Step 3: Design the Test Pyramid

        /  E2E  \         { it('should ...') })` format
- **Key assertions:** What exactly are we verifying?
- **Mock strategy:** What to mock (external deps), what to keep real (internal logic)
- **Edge cases:** Boundary values, empty inputs, error conditions

### Step 5: Define Coverage Targets

- **Line coverage:** Pragmatic target (70-90%, not 100%)
- **Branch coverage:** Focus on critical paths and business logic branches
- **Not worth testing:** Glue code, framework boilerplate, simple pass-through, type-only files
- **Must test:** Business rules, data transformations, error handling, security-sensitive code

### Step 6: Plan Quality Gates

- **Pre-commit:**
  - Lint (ESLint, Biome)
  - Type check (tsc --noEmit)
  - Affected unit tests (if tooling supports)
- **CI pipeline:**
  - Full test suite
  - Coverage threshold check
  - Build verification
- **Manual review checklist:**
  - [ ] New business logic has unit tests
  - [ ] Error paths are tested
  - [ ] No snapshot tests for logic (only for stable UI)
  - [ ] Mocks don't hide real bugs
  - [ ] Test descriptions read as documentation

> **Compaction resilience:** If context is compacted mid-task, check the Progress Checklist for completed steps, re-read this Procedure section, and continue from the next incomplete step.

## Handoff

- If pattern inconsistencies are discovered in test file structure or naming conventions, hand off to **pattern-analysis** for a full codebase convention audit.
- If test boundaries reveal unclear architectural boundaries or service decomposition issues, hand off to **architect department** for structural analysis.

## Output Format

### Test Pyramid Summary

| Layer | Count | Run Time | Mock Strategy |
|-------|-------|----------|---------------|
| Unit | ... | ... | ... |
| Integration | ... | ... | ... |
| E2E | ... | ... | ... |

### Test Specifications

For each test file:

File: src/__tests__/feature.test.ts Layer: Unit

describe('FeatureName') it('should handle the happy path')

  • Input: ...
  • Expected: ...

it('should handle invalid input')

  • Input: ...
  • Expected: throws/returns error

it('should handle edge case')

  • Input: ...
  • Expected: ...

Mocks: ExternalService (return mock data)


### Coverage Targets

| Category | Target | Rationale |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| Business logic | 90%+ | Core value, must be correct |
| API handlers | 80%+ | Contract compliance |
| UI components | 70%+ | Render + key interactions |
| Utilities | 90%+ | Pure functions, easy to test |
| Glue/config | Skip | Not worth testing |

### Quality Gate Checklist

- [ ] Pre-commit hooks configured
- [ ] CI runs full test suite
- [ ] Coverage thresholds enforced
- [ ] New code has corresponding tests

## Quality Checks

- [ ] Every business logic function has a unit test spec
- [ ] Critical user paths have integration tests
- [ ] At least 1 E2E test for the main happy-path flow
- [ ] Mock strategy documented and doesn't hide real bugs
- [ ] Test file locations follow existing project conventions
- [ ] Edge cases and error paths included in test specs
- [ ] Coverage targets are pragmatic (not aspirational 100%)

## Evolution Notes

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [dtsong](https://github.com/dtsong)
- **Source:** [dtsong/my-claude-setup](https://github.com/dtsong/my-claude-setup)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.