AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Gemini Prompting

skill-dysfunc-ai-plugins-cc-gemini-prompting · by dysfunc

Internal guidance for composing Gemini prompts for planning, research, diagnosis, and review tasks inside the Gemini Claude Code plugin

No reviews yet
0 installs
23 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dysfunc-ai-plugins-cc-gemini-prompting

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dysfunc-ai-plugins-cc-gemini-prompting)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Gemini Prompting? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Gemini Prompting

Use this skill when gemini:gemini-rescue needs to ask Gemini for help via the task runtime.

Prompt Gemini like an analyst, not a collaborator with tool access. The plugin runs Gemini headless via gemini -p, so it cannot read files, run commands, or browse the working tree on its own. Everything Gemini sees has to be in the prompt text.

Core rules:

  • Prefer one clear task per Gemini run. Split unrelated asks into separate runs.
  • Tell Gemini what done looks like. Do not assume it will infer the desired end state.
  • Keep prompts compact and block-structured with XML tags so the contract has stable shape.
  • Inline any relevant code, log output, or file excerpts directly in the prompt — Gemini cannot fetch them.
  • Add explicit grounding rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality (review, diagnosis, postmortem analysis).
  • For follow-up requests, the plugin prepends the prior per-job transcript automatically; you only need to send the delta instruction.

Default prompt recipe:

  • ``: the concrete job and the relevant repository or failure context (inlined).
  • ` or `: exact shape, ordering, and brevity requirements.
  • ``: what Gemini should do by default instead of asking routine questions.
  • ``: required for review, research, or anything that could drift into unsupported claims.

When to add blocks:

  • Diagnosis or planning: add ` and an ` block listing what you've inlined.
  • Review or adversarial review: prefer the built-in /gemini:review and /gemini:adversarial-review commands — those carry the review contract and JSON schema. Only fall back to task when the review needs a non-standard target or shape.
  • Research or recommendation tasks: add ` and ` (cite the inlined evidence by line reference, not URL).

Working rules:

  • Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.
  • Use stable XML tag names so the structure is recognizable across runs.
  • Do not raise reasoning effort first. Tighten the prompt and grounding rules before escalating.
  • Ask Gemini for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running.
  • Keep claims anchored to inlined evidence. If something is a hypothesis, say so.
  • For long-running follow-ups, lean on --resume-last so the prior transcript is reused; the plugin truncates oldest turns when the transcript exceeds the cap.

Prompt assembly checklist:

  1. Define the exact task and scope in ``.
  2. Inline the evidence Gemini needs to answer — file excerpts, log slices, error messages, schemas.
  3. Choose the smallest output contract that still makes the answer easy to use.
  4. Decide whether Gemini should keep going by default or stop for missing high-risk details.
  5. Add grounding and verification tags only where the task needs them.
  6. Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.

Common antipatterns:

  • Asking Gemini to "look at file X" — it cannot. Inline X (or a relevant slice) in the prompt instead.
  • Asking Gemini to "run the tests and report" — it cannot. Run them yourself, inline the output, then ask Gemini to analyze.
  • Restating the full prompt on every --resume-last turn — the prior transcript is already prepended.
  • Mixing several unrelated questions in one prompt — split them into separate task runs.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.