AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Ml Failure Audit

skill-eigent-ai-agent-skills-ml-failure-audit · by eigent-ai

General workflow for auditing ML CI failures, experiment regressions, training run failures, golden metric failures, and telemetry-backed ML work-product claims from local repositories, logs, metrics, configs, and artifacts. Use when Codex needs to decide whether an ML failure is a model/convergence issue, correctness bug, data/config issue, infrastructure/runtime issue, evaluation/gating policy…

No reviews yet
0 installs
69 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-eigent-ai-agent-skills-ml-failure-audit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-eigent-ai-agent-skills-ml-failure-audit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ml Failure Audit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

ML Failure Audit

Purpose

Audit ML failures from supplied artifacts without assuming the headline explanation is true. Use this skill when the user provides a repo, logs, W&B/MLflow/TensorBoard exports, CI artifacts, config files, or reports and asks for a diagnosis, go/no-go decision, or structured output.

Core Workflow

  1. Locate evidence
  • Find the repo root, log files, metric exports, configs, test definitions, golden values, and any requested output schema.
  • Treat raw logs, raw telemetry, configs, and source code as higher-trust than reports, PR text, summaries, or generated JSONs.
  1. Classify the failure
  • Separate model/convergence signals from correctness, data, config, runtime, infra, and metric-policy signals.
  • Do not label a failure as model/convergence regression when only a performance, timeout, logging, or tolerance gate failed and correctness/loss checks passed.
  1. Recompute key facts
  • Extract the failing metric/test, passed checks, final run state, key training counters, and relevant metric values.
  • Recompute numeric claims directly from raw artifacts when possible.
  • Record formulas for derived values such as throughput, relative error, finish rate, loss deltas, or token counts.
  1. Trace code paths
  • Identify how the repo selects metrics/tests and how comparisons are made.
  • Cite exact source files and, when useful, function names or line snippets.
  1. Make a decision
  • State whether this is a true ML regression, system correctness bug, infra/runtime issue, data/config issue, metric-policy issue, or unsupported claim.
  • Recommend the minimal policy or engineering action that protects correctness without over-blocking valid runs.
  1. Write outputs
  • Follow the task's requested schema exactly.
  • If no schema is given, write a concise report with: evidence, classification, calculations, recommendation, and validation checks.

Guardrails

  • Do not run expensive GPU training unless the user explicitly requests it.
  • Do not clone remote repos when a local checkout is supplied.
  • Do not trust prose summaries until verified against raw artifacts.
  • Do not infer OOM, convergence, stability, or success from missing logs alone.
  • If the task asks for a file output, create the file; do not only answer in chat.

Helper Script

Use scripts/collect_failure_evidence.py for a quick first pass over a repo and logs:

python3 /scripts/collect_failure_evidence.py \
  --repo  \
  --logs   \
  --out 

The script is intentionally generic. It extracts failure lines, pass lines, metric-looking lines, config/source candidates, and nearby context windows. Use it to accelerate evidence gathering, not as the final diagnosis.

References

  • Read references/workflow.md for the detailed audit checklist and failure taxonomy.
  • Read references/output_guidance.md when the user asks for structured JSON or a file deliverable.

Short Prompt Pattern

Use a short realistic task prompt like:

Use $ml-failure-audit to audit this ML CI failure from the provided repo and logs. Decide whether it is a real training regression or a gate/policy issue, and produce the requested output files.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.