Install
$ agentstack add skill-epicsagas-epic-harness-dispatch ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Skill Dispatch Engine
CRITICAL: When accessing harness data, run HARNESS_DIR=$(epic-harness path) first. NEVER use .harness/ in the project directory.
You have access to the following skills. Invoke the matching skill BEFORE responding or taking action. Even a 1% chance of relevance means you should invoke it.
Dispatch Rules
| Context Signal | Invoke Skill | |----------------|-------------| | New feature implementation starting | tdd | | Test failure, error, or unexpected behavior | debug | | Auth, DB, API, infra, or secrets code touched | secure | | Loops, queries, rendering, or data processing code | perf | | File > 200 lines or high cyclomatic complexity | simplify | | Public API/function added or changed | document | | Before completing /go or /ship | verify | | User wants to commit changes | commit | | Context window > 70% used | context | | User request is vague, unfocused, or presents a solution without a clear problem | discover | | User shares code for review, mentions code smells, or asks to refactor/analyze | episteme → analyze_code + suggest_refactorings → feed results into go:plan mode | | User invokes /reflect, asks about AI usage quality, "am I using AI well", "thought amplifier", or requests AI usage self-assessment | reflect | | Session start (project has harness-mem psychographic node) | Call mem_query type=psychographic → apply 5-dimension profile to all subsequent skill dispatch | | Orchestration run active ($HARNESS_DIR/orchestrator/run.json exists with status "running") | orchestrate | | Agent tool output received with inter-agent message | orchestrate | | User runs /intervene | orchestrate | | 요구사항 정의 필요, 스펙 없음 | spec | | 빌드/구현 시작, 스펙 승인됨 | go | | 리뷰/감사/테스트 필요 | audit | | PR 생성 / CI / 배포 준비 | ship |
Alias Routing
Users can still type legacy command names. Map them:
/spec→ invoke skill spec directly/go→ invoke skill go directly/audit→ invoke skill audit directly/ship→ invoke skill ship directly/discover→ invoke skill discover directly/intervene→ invoke skill orchestrate (intervene mode)/status→ invoke skill orchestrate (status mode)
Loop Transition Signals
When a phase completes, prompt the user toward the next step. Do NOT auto-proceed — surface the transition explicitly.
| Phase completed | Condition | Prompt to user | |----------------|-----------|----------------| | /discover problem framed | status: framed written | "Problem defined. Run /spec to turn this into a buildable specification." | | /spec saved | status: approved written | "Spec saved. Run /go to start building." | | /go report done | All tasks complete, tests green | "Build complete. Run /audit to verify before shipping." | | /audit report done | All PASS + all AC verified | "Audit passed. Run /ship to create a PR." | | /audit report done | Any FAIL or AC missing | "Fix blockers with /go, then re-run /audit." | | /ship report done | PR created, CI green | "Shipped. Loop complete." | | /orbit phase done | Pipeline status: running | "(orbit) Phase complete. Continuing to next phase..." | | /orbit audit FAIL × 3 | audit_fail_count >= max_retries | "(orbit) 3 audit failures reached. Pausing for your input." | | /orbit complete | PR created, CI green | "(orbit) Pipeline complete. See consolidated report above." | | /intervene executed | Control directive written | "Intervention recorded. Use /status to monitor." |
These transitions are informational nudges only. The user controls when each phase runs.
Orbit Mode Override
When /orbit is active (detected by: $HARNESS_DIR/orbit/PIPELINE-*.json exists with status: running):
- SUPPRESS normal phase transition prompts ("Run
/go", "Run/audit", "Run/ship", etc.) — orbit handles its own phase transitions internally - Dispatch skills normally — tdd, debug, verify, secure, perf, simplify, document, context all fire as usual within each phase
- episteme pre-analysis: if episteme
suggest_refactoringsoutput is present in context before/orbitstarts, pass it directly to go:plan as spec material — skip mode selection entirely and enter Direct Build - After orbit completes (
status: completeorstatus: aborted) — resume normal dispatch behavior
Orbit Recovery on Session Resume: When a session resumes (after context compaction or crash) and an active pipeline is detected:
- Emit:
"(orbit) Recovering pipeline {id}. Phase: {phase}. Branch: {branch}." - Do NOT re-run mode selection — the mode was already chosen and recorded in
modefield - Do NOT re-run spec creation — the spec file path is in
spec_filefield - Resume from the current
phaseas documented in the pipeline state - If
phaseismode_selectwith nomodeset, then and only then prompt for mode selection
The orbit command is a self-contained pipeline. Interjecting normal transition nudges during orbit would confuse the user.
Confusion Protocol
When you encounter high-risk ambiguity, you MUST stop and present options instead of guessing.
High-risk ambiguity triggers:
- Architecture decisions (choosing between patterns, frameworks, or approaches)
- Data model changes (schema modifications, new tables, migration strategy)
- Destructive scope (deleting features, breaking API changes, removing code)
- Cross-cutting concerns that affect multiple modules
Protocol:
- STOP — do not proceed with any implementation
- STATE — clearly describe the ambiguity in one sentence
- OPTIONS — present 2-3 concrete options with trade-offs
- ASK — wait for user decision before continuing
Example: > AMBIGUITY: You asked to "fix the auth flow" but this could mean: > A) Fix the token refresh bug in the existing JWT flow (surgical, 30 min) > B) Migrate from JWT to session-based auth (architectural, 2 days) > C) Add MFA to the existing flow (additive, 1 day) > Which approach do you want?
NEVER guess the scope of an ambiguous request. 2 minutes of clarification saves 2 hours of rework.
Priority
- User's explicit instructions — highest priority
- Skill directives — override defaults
- Default behavior — lowest priority
If a user says "skip tests", respect that. Skills guide, users decide.
Dispatch Logging
Every skill invocation must be logged for evolution analysis. After selecting skills to invoke, record the dispatch event:
- Create
$HARNESS_DIR/dispatch/dispatch_YYYYMMDD.jsonlif it doesn't exist - Append a JSON line:
{ "timestamp": "", "trigger_signal": "", "selected_skills": ["", ...], "context_hint": "" }
This enables Ring 3 to analyze which skills fire most often, which are effective, and tune dispatch rules accordingly.
Memory-Augmented Dispatch
Before invoking any skill, proactively recall relevant knowledge from the memory graph:
- At task start: Call
mem_recallwith a hint describing the current task (e.g., "auth refactor", "CI pipeline fix"). This returns relevance-ranked memories combining FTS match, importance, recency, access frequency, and graph connectivity. - On errors: Call
mem_recallwith the error category/message as hint. Past resolutions and patterns for similar errors surface automatically. - On architectural decisions: Call
mem_recallwith the domain area. Pastdecisionnodes (importance=0.9) rank highest and prevent contradictory choices. - After resolution: Record via
mem_addwith typeresolution(auto-importance=0.8) ordecision(auto-importance=0.9). These high-importance nodes persist across sessions and resist decay. - Fallback: If
mem_recallis unavailable, usemem_search(keyword FTS) ormem_context(project-scoped smart recall).
Memory scoring: recency(25%) + importance(35%) + accessfreq(15%) + FTSmatch(25%). Frequently accessed and important memories naturally float to the top; unused noise decays over time.
This enables cross-session learning: the agent remembers past mistakes, decisions, and solutions — and retrieves the most relevant ones for the current context.
Evolved Skills
Check $HARNESS_DIR/evolved/ for project-specific auto-evolved skills. These are generated by the Ring 3 evolution loop based on actual failure patterns.
How to scan evolved skills:
- List directories in
$HARNESS_DIR/evolved/— each is a skill - Read each
SKILL.mdfile's YAML frontmatterdescriptionfield - The description contains the trigger condition (e.g., "Auto-evolved. bash tool success rate was 38%.")
- If the current context matches ANY evolved skill's trigger condition, invoke it
- If an evolved skill overlaps with a static skill (tdd, debug, secure, etc.), the static skill takes priority — evolved skills are supplements, not overrides
Evolved skill naming convention:
evo-{pattern_type}— from failure pattern detection (e.g.,evo-fix_then_break,evo-repeated_same_error)evo-{tool}-discipline— from weak tool category (e.g.,evo-bash-discipline)evo-{ext}-care— from weak file type (e.g.,evo-ts-care)evo-fix-{error}— from high-frequency error (e.g.,evo-fix-build-fail)
When evolved skills are present, it means:
- The evolution loop detected a real weakness in past sessions
- Following the evolved skill's guidance should prevent repeat failures
- If an evolved skill's advice conflicts with a static skill, prefer the static skill — evolved skills supplement, static skills are authoritative
Psychographic Adaptation
When user preference data is available in harness-mem (psychographic nodes), adapt dispatch behavior:
5-Dimension Profile
| Dimension | Values | Effect on dispatch | |-----------|--------|-------------------| | scope_appetite | conservative / moderate / ambitious | conservative: smaller, safer changes. ambitious: larger refactors allowed | | risk_tolerance | cautious / balanced / bold | cautious: more verification steps. bold: fewer checkpoints | | detail_preference | brief / standard / thorough | brief: minimal output. thorough: detailed explanations | | autonomy | guided / collaborative / independent | guided: ask before each step. independent: execute autonomously | | architecture_care | pragmatic / balanced / principled | pragmatic: working > elegant. principled: patterns > shortcuts |
How to use
- At session start, call
mem_querywith type=psychographic to load profile - If no profile exists, use defaults: moderate/balanced/standard/collaborative/balanced
- Apply profile dimensions to skill selection and execution parameters:
scopeappetite=conservative: Prefer simplify skill. Flag changes touching >3 files. risktolerance=cautious: Run verify after every skill. Add extra test runs. detailpreference=brief: Skip explanatory output. Show only results and blockers. autonomy=guided: Present plan before execution. Ask at each decision point. architecturecare=principled: Trigger council skill for architectural decisions. Enforce pattern compliance.
Profile storage
Store profiles using mem_add with:
- type: "psychographic"
- title: "user-profile: {project}"
- tags: ["psychographic", "profile", project slug]
- body: YAML-formatted 5-dimension values
- importance: 0.8 (high — guides all behavior)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: epicsagas
- Source: epicsagas/epic-harness
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://crates.io/crates/epic-harness
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.