Install
$ agentstack add skill-ericgandrade-claude-superskills-writing-plans ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Writing Plans
Purpose
Create executable, low-ambiguity implementation plans that another engineer can run task-by-task with predictable outcomes.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Requirements/specs exist but implementation has not started
- Work is multi-step and requires coordination across files and tests
- A handoff-ready plan is needed for another session or engineer
Progress Tracking
Display progress at each planning phase:
[████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░] 25% — Phase 1/4: Gathering Context & Constraints
[████████░░░░░░░░░░░░] 50% — Phase 2/4: Decomposing Into Tasks
[████████████░░░░░░░░] 75% — Phase 3/4: Specifying Files & Commands
[████████████████████] 100% — Phase 4/4: Writing & Saving Plan
Workflow
- Gather context and constraints
- Break work into bite-sized, test-first tasks
- Specify exact files, code snippets, and commands
- Add validation criteria and expected outputs
- Save plan and hand off to
executing-plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-.md
Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
- "Write the failing test" - step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
- "Commit" - step
Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
Task Structure
````markdown
Task N: [Component Name]
Files:
- Create:
exact/path/to/file.py - Modify:
exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145 - Test:
tests/exact/path/to/test.py
Step 1: Write the failing test
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input):
return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
````
Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
"Plan complete and saved to docs/plans/.md. Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session) - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
2. Parallel Session (separate) - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
Which approach?"
If Subagent-Driven chosen:
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
If Parallel Session chosen:
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: New session uses superpowers:executing-plans
Critical Rules
- Always include exact paths and exact commands.
- Always define expected outcomes for test/verification steps.
- Never leave steps abstract (avoid "implement validation" without concrete code intent).
Example Usage
- "Use writing-plans to plan migration from REST to GraphQL."
- "Use writing-plans to break down an auth refactor into TDD tasks."
- "Use writing-plans to prepare a handoff plan for a new caching layer."
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ericgandrade
- Source: ericgandrade/claude-superskills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.