Install
$ agentstack add skill-ericwang915-data-scientist-skills-validate-data-quality ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Validate Data Quality
Purpose
Produce a comprehensive data quality scorecard that measures your dataset across six industry-standard dimensions. Provides actionable remediation steps and code to build ongoing quality monitoring.
How It Works
Step 1: Define Quality Expectations
- What does "good" look like for this dataset?
- Identify critical columns vs. nice-to-have columns
- Establish acceptable thresholds per dimension
- Reference data contracts or SLAs if available
Step 2: Assess Six Dimensions
| Dimension | What It Measures | Example Checks | |-----------|-----------------|----------------| | Completeness | Are all required values present? | Null rates, empty strings, placeholder values | | Accuracy | Do values reflect reality? | Range checks, lookup validation, statistical reasonableness | | Consistency | Do values agree across sources? | Cross-column validation, referential integrity, format consistency | | Timeliness | Is data fresh enough? | Latency from source, staleness detection, timestamp gaps | | Uniqueness | Are there unwanted duplicates? | Primary key violations, fuzzy duplicates, entity resolution | | Validity | Do values conform to rules? | Schema compliance, regex patterns, enum membership, business rules |
Step 3: Generate Scorecard
- Score each dimension 0-100% per column and overall
- Color-code: 🟢 >90%, 🟡 70-90%, 🔴 <70%
- Rank issues by severity and business impact
- Produce a visual summary dashboard
Step 4: Remediation Plan
- Prioritized list of fixes with effort estimates
- Python code for automated quality checks
- Great Expectations or Pandera validation suite generation
- Monitoring recommendations for ongoing quality tracking
Usage Examples
Example 1: Pre-analysis audit
"Audit this customer dataset before I use it for segmentation analysis.
I need to trust the email, revenue, and signup_date columns."
Example 2: Pipeline monitoring
"Generate a Great Expectations suite for this dataset so we can
validate every new batch automatically"
Output Format
- Scorecard: Visual summary with per-dimension scores
- Issue Details: Each issue with severity, affected rows, and examples
- Remediation Plan: Prioritized fixes with Python code
- Monitoring Code: Automated validation suite (Great Expectations / Pandera)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ericwang915
- Source: ericwang915/data-scientist-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.