Install
$ agentstack add skill-etr-groundwork-understanding-feature-requests ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Understanding Feature Requests
Interactive workflow for clarifying feature requests and ensuring they don't conflict with existing requirements.
Pre-flight: Model Recommendation
Your current effort level is {{effort_level}}.
Skip this step silently if effort is high, xhigh, or max (the scale is low < medium < high < xhigh < max, so xhigh and max are already above high) AND you are Sonnet or Opus. If effort is low or medium (i.e. below high), you MUST show the recommendation prompt — regardless of model. If you are not Sonnet or Opus, you MUST show the recommendation prompt - regardless of effort level.
Otherwise → use AskUserQuestion:
{
"questions": [{
"question": "Do you want to switch? Contradiction detection in feature requirements benefits from consistent reasoning.\n\nTo switch: cancel, run `/effort high` (and `/model sonnet` if on Haiku), then re-invoke this skill.",
"header": "Recommended: Sonnet or Opus at high effort",
"options": [
{ "label": "Continue" },
{ "label": "Cancel — I'll switch first" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}]
}
If the user selects "Cancel — I'll switch first": output the switching commands above and stop. Do not proceed with the skill.
Step 1: Clarify the Request
When the user proposes a feature or change, ask clarifying questions to understand:
Core Questions (always ask):
- What problem does this solve for the user?
- Who is the target user/persona?
- What is the expected outcome or behavior?
Exploratory Questions (for open-ended or vague requests):
- "What inspired this feature idea?"
- "Have you seen this done well elsewhere? What did you like about it?"
- "What would make this feature 'delightful' vs just 'adequate'?"
- "What's the simplest version that would provide value?"
- "If you had to cut half the scope, what would you keep?"
Conditional Questions (ask as relevant):
- What triggers this behavior? (for event-driven features)
- What are the edge cases or error conditions?
- What is explicitly out of scope?
- Are there dependencies on other features?
- What metrics would indicate success?
- How could this fail? What are the possible risks and dangers?
- Could we do this in any other way?
Keep questions focused - ask 2-3 at a time, not all at once. Build understanding iteratively.
Question Style:
- Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible - they're easier to answer and keep conversations focused
- Explore one topic at a time to avoid overwhelming stakeholders
- When presenting alternatives, lead with your recommendation
Step 2: Check for Internal Contradictions
Before proceeding with design, review for conflicts within the proposed feature:
- Conflicting behaviors (e.g., "shall be real-time" AND "shall work offline-first")
- Incompatible constraints (e.g., "shall complete in <100ms" AND "shall process 10,000 items")
- Mutually exclusive states
If conflicts found, surface them and resolve before proceeding.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: etr
- Source: etr/groundwork
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.