Install
$ agentstack add skill-evolvehq-docflow-add-convention ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
add-convention
Add a convention — but only after assessing whether it should exist and where it belongs. This skill is a gatekeeper and a router, not a stenographer.
Step 0 — Preconditions and context
- Confirm the repo is bootstrapped.
- Read
CONVENTIONS.mdandAGENTS.mdin full so you can detect
overlap with existing rules and judge fit.
Step 0.5 — Assessment (run first)
Run the shared assessment protocol; the triage (Step 1) and routing (Step 2) questions are asked under it:
- Opt-out gate first. Ask whether to run the assessment or skip to
drafting. Recommend running it when the request arrived with little or no context; recommend skipping when the convention and its home are already clear.
- Ask questions one at a time, each with a recommended option and
a one-line reason; wait for each answer.
- Use structured selection (single- or multiple-choice). If the host
exposes a structured single-/multi-select question tool, use it and mark the recommended option; otherwise list options A/B/C in plain text and name the recommended one. Use free text only where an enumerable set is impossible (e.g. the exact wording).
- The operator decides. Never proceed past a question without an
answer, and never guess scope when invoked with no context.
Questions (skip any the request already answers):
- Worth codifying? — yes (recurring, stable, testable) or no
(one-off, duplicate, churn-prone, vague). Recommended: per the Step 1 triage; this question gates the rest.
- Home —
AGENTS.mdhard rule /CONVENTIONS.mdguidance /
GLOSSARY.md term / actually a decision (hand off to the new-adr skill). Recommended: per the rule's nature (see Step 2).
- Enforce in the verify gate? — yes / no. *Recommended: no, unless
the rule is mechanically checkable.*
- Wording — free text (the rule statement itself).
Step 1 — Assess: is this worth codifying?
Apply triage. Recommend against adding when:
- It is already covered (explicitly or implicitly) by an existing
convention — point to it instead of duplicating.
- It is a one-off, not a recurring decision — codifying it adds noise.
- It is likely to churn — premature rules become stale cruft.
- It is too vague to be testable or actionable as written.
Recommend for adding when it is a recurring decision whose ambiguity causes rework, it is stable, and it can be stated so an agent can follow it without further interpretation. State your recommendation and the reason before doing anything.
Step 2 — Route: where does it belong?
Decide the home, and explain the choice:
- Hard rule agents must obey → a bullet in
AGENTS.md§Hard rules,
with the substance in CONVENTIONS.md. Use for non-negotiable constraints.
- Authoring / process guidance → a section in
CONVENTIONS.md.
Use for "how we do things" that informs but doesn't gate.
- Shared term / definition →
GLOSSARY.md(create it if absent —
adding the first term enables the glossary layer; place it at the recorded artefact root).
- It is actually a decision, not a convention (an architectural,
product, or technology choice with alternatives and consequences) → this is an ADR. Stop and offer the new-adr skill; do not bury a decision in CONVENTIONS.
If a convention is a triage/process rule (e.g. how incoming work is triaged), prefer CONVENTIONS.md with a hard-rule bullet in AGENTS.md only for the parts that are non-negotiable.
Step 3 — Draft and confirm
Draft the exact wording for its home file. Keep it tight, testable, and in the repo's language. Show the diff. Confirm before writing.
Step 4 — Write and commit
Apply the edit(s). If a convention rises to a hard rule, ensure AGENTS.md and CONVENTIONS.md stay consistent. Conventional Commit (docs: ...); no ADR touched means no Rationale: footer is required, but add one if the repo's contract asks for it on convention changes.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: EvolveHQ
- Source: EvolveHQ/docflow
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://evolvehq.github.io/docflow/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.