AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Config Compress

skill-fabis94-universal-ai-config-ai-config-compress · by fabis94

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-fabis94-universal-ai-config-ai-config-compress

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Ai Config Compress? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Prompt Compress

Compress LLM instructions with calibrated risk. Research shows ~60% of instruction tokens are removable without degrading output quality — and compression often improves performance by concentrating model attention.

Core Principles

  1. Instructions are the most sensitive prompt component. Apply maximum

compression to examples and context, moderate compression to structure, minimal compression to core behavioral rules.

  1. Semantic equivalence ≠ behavioral equivalence. Two phrasings that mean the

same thing to a human can produce different model behavior. Every change beyond mechanical cleanup carries nonzero risk.

  1. Compress in tiers. Apply safest changes first, present riskier changes as

suggestions. The user decides how far to go.

Workflow

1. Analyze

Before compressing anything, analyze the input:

  • Count tokens (estimate: words × 1.3 for English)
  • Identify sections by function: safety, formatting, tone, behavior, examples,

context, metadata

  • Detect duplicates: rules that express the same constraint in different words
  • Flag filler: politeness markers, hedging, verbose connectives
  • Note structural issues: scattered related rules, inconsistent formatting
  • Identify examples and assess whether they're redundant with stated rules

Present a brief analysis summary with estimated savings per tier.

2. Compress in Tiers

Apply changes tier by tier. For each tier, show a diff and token savings.

Tier 1 — Mechanical (auto-apply, safe)

These changes preserve exact meaning. Apply all of them:

  • Fix typos and inconsistent punctuation
  • Normalize whitespace (double spaces, trailing spaces, excessive blank lines)
  • Apply word-level substitutions from references/substitutions.md
  • Remove pure filler: "please note that," "it is important to," "keep in mind"
  • Remove politeness in system prompts: "please," "kindly," "if you don't mind"
  • Strip unnecessary articles in imperative instructions ("Write the response" → "Write response")
  • Remove self-referential meta-commentary ("The following rules govern your behavior:" → just list the rules)
Tier 2 — Structural (recommend, low-medium risk)

These reorganize without changing meaning, but removal of "redundant" rules may remove useful reinforcement:

  • Deduplicate: Merge rules expressing the same constraint. Keep the most

specific version. Example: "Be professional" + "Maintain professional tone" + "Always respond professionally" → "Maintain professional tone."

  • Group by function: Collect scattered rules under section headers.

Consolidating related rules eliminates repetitive framing ("When responding...", "In your responses...", "Your responses should...").

  • Flatten conditionals: Convert nested if-else to flat patterns.

"If user asks X, check Y, and if Y then Z" → "X + Y → Z; X + ¬Y → W"

  • Remove hedging on directives: "You should try to ensure responses are

accurate" → "Be accurate." Only where the hedge adds no real nuance.

  • Trim verbose examples: If 5+ examples illustrate the same pattern, keep

2-3 that cover distinct cases. Flag which ones you'd cut and why.

Tier 3 — Semantic (suggest only, medium-high risk)

These change wording while attempting to preserve intent. Present as suggestions with explicit risk notes. Never auto-apply:

  • Telegraphic style: Drop articles, pronouns, connectives from behavioral

rules. "When the user asks you a question, you should provide a clear and concise answer" → "Answer questions clearly and concisely."

  • Principalize examples: Replace remaining examples with a principle

statement. "Example: 'Hello!' → 'Hi there!' / 'Hey' → 'Hello!'" → "Mirror greeting energy, match formality level."

  • Merge overlapping rules: Combine rules that address related behaviors.

Only where the merged version clearly covers both originals.

  • Remove examples entirely: If the rule is clear without them. Flag as

HIGH RISK — few-shot examples reduce prompt sensitivity by ~30%.

  • Reorder sections: Move most critical rules to beginning and end of prompt

(attention U-curve). Flag as MEDIUM RISK — reordering alone can cause significant behavioral shifts.

Tier 4 — Aggressive (flag only, high risk)

Only mention these as possibilities. Never draft them without explicit user request:

  • Removing safety/guardrail instructions
  • Changing role/persona framing
  • Switching prompting strategies (zero-shot ↔ chain-of-thought)
  • SPR-style compression (reducing to associative priming cues)
  • Removing entire sections deemed low-value

3. Present Results

Output a compression report with this structure:

## Compression Report

**Original**: ~{n} tokens ({word_count} words)

### Tier 1 — Mechanical [{savings}% reduction]
{compressed text with changes}

### Tier 2 — Structural [{cumulative savings}% reduction]
{compressed text with Tier 1+2 applied}
Changes made:
- {change 1}: {rationale}
- {change 2}: {rationale}

### Tier 3 — Suggestions [{potential additional savings}%]
- [ ] {suggestion 1} — saves ~{n} tokens — RISK: {level} — {why risky}
- [ ] {suggestion 2} — saves ~{n} tokens — RISK: {level} — {why risky}

### Tier 4 — Aggressive options [{potential savings}%]
- {option}: {what it would save} — {what might break}

**Summary**: Tier 1+2 achieves ~{n}% reduction ({old} → {new} tokens).
Tier 3 suggestions could reach ~{n}% total if accepted.

4. Deliver

  • If the user wants a specific tier applied, produce the final compressed text

with all changes through that tier

  • If they want to cherry-pick Tier 3 suggestions, apply only selected ones
  • Always provide the final compressed version as a clean, copy-pasteable block

Important Caveats to Communicate

  • Compression effectiveness depends on the target model. What works for Claude

may not work identically for GPT or Gemini.

  • Larger/newer models tolerate more compression. If targeting smaller models,

be more conservative.

  • The only real validation is testing compressed prompts against actual tasks.

This skill optimizes for likely preservation, not guaranteed preservation.

  • Examples are disproportionately valuable. Cutting examples saves the most tokens

but carries the most risk.

Reference Files

  • Read references/substitutions.md for the mechanical substitution dictionary

used in Tier 1. Load this before applying Tier 1 changes.

  • Read references/examples.md for before/after compression examples across

different instruction types. Consult when unsure about a compression decision.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.