AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Firewall Best Practices Audit

skill-fastrevmd-lab-fwskillsshare-firewall-best-practices-audit · by fastrevmd-lab

Audit normalized Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto, and Juniper firewall rulebases for security hygiene. Use when finding any-any, shadowed, redundant, or orphaned rules, missing deny or logging, exposed management, weak VPN crypto, hardening gaps, or unused objects. Parse raw configs first.

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-fastrevmd-lab-fwskillsshare-firewall-best-practices-audit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-fastrevmd-lab-fwskillsshare-firewall-best-practices-audit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
28d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Firewall Best Practices Audit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Firewall Best-Practices Audit

Overview

Use this skill to audit a firewall or NGFW rulebase for security and operational hygiene, vendor-neutrally, over the parsing-* intermediate JSON schema. The audit reads normalized security_policies, nat_rules, address/service objects and groups, zones, vpn_tunnels, system, and admin_users, then emits prioritized findings across the security and operational check families (full catalog: references/check-catalog.md). Each finding carries a severity, a confidence, the affected references, why it matters, and remediation.

This skill is deliberately framework-agnostic. It answers "is this rulebase hardened by general best practice" — not "does this satisfy PCI/HIPAA/CMMC/CIS/ISO/SOC 2." That mapping is the job of the *-ngfw-compliance skills, which take a framework's control IDs and produce assessor-ready evidence. This skill stays in the lane of general hygiene: it never cites a control ID and never claims an environment is compliant. Use it before or alongside a compliance review, or on its own when someone just wants the rulebase cleaned up and tightened.

The audit reports findings, not verdicts. It never claims a config is "secure" — at best it reports "no in-scope findings" with caveats about what could not be checked (for example, hit-count or last-used data that the static schema does not carry). The output is decision-grade: a short posture line, a severity tally, the list of checks that were skipped for missing data, and a prioritized list of top fixes.

Scope and routing

Operate on the normalized parsing-* schema; do not hand-audit raw vendor text when a parser exists. Route framework mappings to the matching compliance skill, migrations to firewall-config-conversion, and parity or drift comparisons to firewall-config-diff.

Input Handling

Route on what you were given:

  • Parsed intermediate schema (the vendor-neutral JSON produced by any parsing-* skill; the schema definition lives in the parsing-srx-configs skill) — audit directly. Read metadata.source_vendor to drive vendor-specific remediation snippets. metadata.source_vendor is the canonical schema field; for robustness also accept a legacy metadata.vendor key if a non-conformant parse provides one — read whichever is present.
  • Raw config — identify the vendor from the syntax, run the matching parsing-* skill (parsing-cisco-configs, parsing-fortinet-configs, parsing-palo-configs, parsing-srx-configs) to produce the intermediate schema, then audit the result. Never re-implement parsing in this skill. For a single live device pulled via NETCONF/MCP, parsing-srx-configs permits auditing from the extracted hierarchical sections without full schema emission — still route the extraction through that skill; never hand-parse raw text ad hoc.
  • Unsupported vendor with no parser — say so plainly: there is no parser for this vendor, so a structured audit cannot be produced; offer to audit a manually-normalized schema or to reason about pasted excerpts without finding IDs.

As of v1.1 the audit also reads system.ssh, system.auth, system.control_plane_protection, zones[].screen, and security_services to cover device-plane hardening (SSH/management hardening, password/lockout policy, screen presence, and unreferenced security services); any of these fields that is absent simply skips its dependent check.

Graceful degradation: the schema is static, so some checks have no input (for example, anything depending on hit counts or last-used timestamps, and any check needing a field the source parser did not populate). When a field is missing, skip the dependent check rather than guessing, and record every skipped check in the audit summary so the gap is visible.

Severity & Confidence

| Severity | One-line criterion | |----------|--------------------| | Critical | Direct, exploitable exposure — any-any-allow across a trust boundary, dangerous service open to untrust, plaintext admin reachable externally, broken/keyless VPN. | | High | Strong weakness — overly permissive allow, shadowed rules hiding later policy, weak VPN/IKE crypto (DES/3DES/MD5/SHA1/DH] () — Category: / Affected: Why it matters: Remediation: Fix ():


### Audit Summary

```text
Posture: 
Findings: Critical   High   Medium   Low   Info 
Checks skipped (no data): 
Top fixes (prioritized):
  1.  — 
  2.  — 

Common Pitfalls

  • Claiming a config is "secure" or "compliant" — only report "no in-scope findings" with caveats about what could not be checked.
  • Mapping findings to PCI/HIPAA/etc. — that is the compliance skills' job; stay framework-agnostic and cite no control IDs.
  • Re-implementing parsing instead of delegating to the matching parsing-* skill.
  • Reporting heuristic findings (possible shadow) as definitive when rule order or object references are incomplete.
  • Auditing only the internet edge — include internal, management, VPN, and inter-zone rules.
  • Ignoring NAT when reasoning about real exposure — a translated address can change what a rule actually permits.
  • Flagging disabled rules as active risk — note them as cleanup, not exposure.
  • Treating an unreferenced object as a finding without confirming the schema captured all references.
  • Putting real secrets or PSKs in example output — always redact.
  • Silently dropping checks when a schema field is missing — list them as skipped in the summary.

Verification Checklist

  • [ ] Confirm input type (parsed schema vs raw config) and source vendor.
  • [ ] For raw config, the matching parsing-* skill was run first.
  • [ ] Every finding has id, severity, confidence, affected refs, rationale, remediation.
  • [ ] Remediation includes vendor-neutral guidance + a source-vendor snippet.
  • [ ] Heuristic findings are labeled; definitive vs heuristic is correct.
  • [ ] Skipped checks (missing schema fields) are listed in the summary.
  • [ ] Output makes no "secure"/"compliant" claim and no compliance-framework mapping.
  • [ ] No real secrets in any snippet.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.