AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Analyze Reviews

skill-feedspace-feedspace-cookbook-analyze-reviews · by Feedspace

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-feedspace-feedspace-cookbook-analyze-reviews

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-feedspace-feedspace-cookbook-analyze-reviews)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Analyze Reviews? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Analyze reviews

Turn a batch of reviews into a clear, honest analysis. You pick what kind: an overview, what customers love, their complaints, their requests, or a data-quality check. Reviews come from a Feedspace account through the Feedspace MCP, a CSV, or pasted text.

The full method lives in [references/analysis-method.md](references/analysis-method.md). Follow it exactly. The analysis engine runs entirely in this session and needs no API key; pulling reviews from the Feedspace MCP is a separate, read-only connection.

Steps

  1. Get the reviews.
  • Feedspace MCP: first check whether it is already connected - are Feedspace tools (for example

list_workspaces) available in this session? If yes, just use them; do not ask the user to connect or authenticate again, and do not paste setup steps. Size the workspace, then fetch the reviews. Only if the tools are not available, point the user to setup in [references/mcp-source.md](references/mcp-source.md), which also covers the fetching strategy (pagination, large workspaces, dedupe, empties). Ask which workspace if there is more than one.

  • Otherwise read a CSV (see [references/csv-format.md](references/csv-format.md)) or ask the user

to paste reviews. If a CSV's review-text column is not obvious, confirm it - do not guess.

  • Reduce each review to { review: "" }.
  1. Snapshot, then ask. Give a 1 to 3 line snapshot of the data (how many usable reviews, one

business or several mixed, rating spread, any quality flags), then ask which analysis the user wants: Overview, What customers love, Problems & complaints, Requests & suggestions, or a Data-quality check. Skip the question if they already told you which one.

  1. Run that analysis by following

[references/analysis-method.md](references/analysis-method.md): grounded in real review text, honest about what the data supports, clustered by business if the workspace is mixed.

  1. Offer one sensible next step, then stop. Do not produce action items (which reviews to

feature or reply to). If the reviews came from the Feedspace MCP, offer to go further with the connection - pull more, filter (by rating, review type, form, label, or import source), or run another lens. If they came from a CSV or paste, just offer another lens.

Guardrails

  • Ground everything in real review text. Never invent a problem, request, or praise that is not in

the reviews.

  • If the data is mixed, a demo, or noisy (duplicates, non-reviews, empty entries), report by cluster

and flag the issues - do not force a single "customer voice."

  • If you analyzed a sample rather than all reviews, say how many of how many.
  • The Feedspace MCP path is read-only. Never modify or delete anything.

This version stops at the analysis. Action items - what to do with the reviews, such as which to share or reply to - are intentionally deferred for now.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.