AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Oma Coordination

skill-first-fluke-oh-my-agent-oma-coordination · by first-fluke

Guide for coordinating PM, Frontend, Backend, Mobile, and QA agents on complex projects via CLI. Use for manual step-by-step coordination and workflow guidance.

No reviews yet
0 installs
4 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-first-fluke-oh-my-agent-oma-coordination

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-first-fluke-oh-my-agent-oma-coordination)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Oma Coordination? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Multi-Agent Workflow Guide

Scheduling

Goal

Guide manual multi-agent coordination for complex work that spans PM, frontend, backend, mobile, and QA responsibilities.

Intent signature

  • User wants step-by-step coordination, manual agent spawning, or multi-domain work planning without full automation.
  • Task spans multiple specialist agents and requires contract alignment.

When to use

  • Complex feature spanning multiple domains (full-stack, mobile)
  • Coordination needed between frontend, backend, mobile, and QA
  • User wants step-by-step guidance for multi-agent coordination

When NOT to use

  • Simple single-domain task -> use the specific agent directly
  • User wants automated execution -> use orchestrator
  • Quick bug fixes or minor changes

Expected inputs

  • Complex feature or project goal
  • Required domains and priority tiers
  • Workspace/session constraints and API/data contract needs

Expected outputs

  • Manual coordination sequence
  • PM task decomposition, agent spawn order, monitoring guidance, and QA review step
  • API/data contract alignment checkpoints

Dependencies

  • PM, frontend, backend, mobile, QA, and orchestrator skills
  • resources/examples.md
  • CLI oma agent:spawn and progress/result memory conventions

Control-flow features

  • Branches by task complexity, priority tiers, dependency ordering, and whether automation is desired
  • Spawns independent same-priority tasks in parallel when appropriate
  • Monitors progress files and contract alignment

Structural Flow

Entry

  1. Confirm the task is complex enough for multi-agent coordination.
  2. Start with PM task decomposition.
  3. Identify priority tiers and shared contracts.

Scenes

  1. PREPARE: Define session, domains, and task decomposition needs.
  2. ACT: Spawn agents by priority with separate workspaces.
  3. VERIFY: Monitor progress and API/data contract alignment.
  4. FINALIZE: Run QA review and coordinate remediation.

Transitions

  • If task is simple, route to one specialist.
  • If user wants automated execution, use orchestrator.
  • If QA finds CRITICAL issues, re-spawn responsible agents.

Failure and recovery

  • If contracts diverge, pause downstream frontend/mobile work until backend/API contract is reconciled.
  • If agent workspaces conflict, split ownership boundaries.
  • If progress stalls, inspect progress files and reissue focused instructions.

Exit

  • Success: specialist outputs are coordinated and QA-reviewed.
  • Partial success: blocked agents, contract conflicts, or QA failures are explicit.

Logical Operations

Actions

| Action | SSL primitive | Evidence | |--------|---------------|----------| | Read request and domains | READ | User prompt and project context | | Select agent plan | SELECT | PM decomposition and priority tiers | | Spawn agents | CALL_TOOL | oma agent:spawn | | Monitor progress | READ | progress-{agent}.md | | Validate contracts | VALIDATE | API/data model alignment | | Notify coordination status | NOTIFY | Final coordination summary |

Tools and instruments

  • oma agent:spawn, PM/frontend/backend/mobile/QA agents
  • Memory/progress/result files
  • Serena MCP for exploration and modification when used by specialists

Canonical command path

oma agent:spawn pm ""  -w ./pm
oma agent:spawn backend ""  -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend ""  -w ./frontend &
wait

Resource scope

| Scope | Resource target | |-------|-----------------| | LOCAL_FS | Progress/result files and workspaces | | PROCESS | Agent spawn commands | | MEMORY | Session state and task board | | CODEBASE | Shared contracts and implementation areas |

Preconditions

  • Task requires multiple domains.
  • PM decomposition can identify independent priority tiers.

Effects and side effects

  • Spawns or guides multiple agents.
  • Coordinates workspace ownership and QA feedback.

Guardrails

  1. Always start with PM Agent for task decomposition
  2. Spawn independent tasks in parallel (same priority tier)
  3. Define API contracts before frontend/mobile tasks
  4. QA review is always the final step
  5. Assign separate workspaces to avoid file conflicts
  6. Always use Serena MCP tools as the primary method for code exploration and modification
  7. Never skip steps in the workflow — follow each step sequentially without omission

Workflow

Step 1: Plan with PM Agent

PM Agent analyzes requirements, selects tech stack, creates task breakdown with priorities.

Step 2: Spawn Agents by Priority

Spawn agents via CLI:

  1. Use spawn-agent.sh for each task
  2. CLI selection follows agentclimapping in oma-config.yaml
  3. Spawn all same-priority tasks in parallel using background processes
# Example: spawn backend and frontend in parallel
oma agent:spawn backend "task description" session-id -w ./backend &
oma agent:spawn frontend "task description" session-id -w ./frontend &
wait

Step 3: Monitor & Coordinate

  • Use memory read tool to poll progress-{agent}.md files
  • Verify API contracts align between agents
  • Ensure shared data models are consistent

Step 4: QA Review

Spawn QA Agent last to review all deliverables. Address CRITICAL issues by re-spawning agents.

Automated Alternative

For fully automated execution without manual spawning, use the orchestrator skill instead.

References

  • Workflow examples: resources/examples.md

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.