AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Test Plan Generator

skill-firstp1ck-pi-coding-agent-forge-test-plan-generator · by Firstp1ck

Agents should invoke this skill when planning tests from specs, architecture docs, PRs, risky changes, new features, bug fixes, or release work. Generates prioritized unit, integration, E2E, regression, and edge-case coverage.

No reviews yet
0 installs
28 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-firstp1ck-pi-coding-agent-forge-test-plan-generator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-firstp1ck-pi-coding-agent-forge-test-plan-generator)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Test Plan Generator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Test Plan Generator

Generate structured, prioritized test plans from spec and architecture documents.

Inputs

  • projects//combined-plan.md (primary source of truth)
  • projects//spec.md (original requirements)
  • projects//architecture.md (module boundaries and interfaces)
  • Forge's completion report (existing test coverage)

Process

Step 1 — Extract Requirements

Read the combined plan and extract every testable requirement:

  • Explicit acceptance criteria from the spec
  • Interface contracts from the architecture
  • Security constraints from Zero's review
  • Error handling expectations
  • Edge cases mentioned in the spec
  • Non-functional requirements (performance, accessibility)

Step 2 — Derive Test Cases

For each requirement, create one or more test cases:

| ID | Requirement | Test Case | Category | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-001 | User can create account | Valid email + password creates account | E2E | P0 | Pending |
| TC-002 | User can create account | Duplicate email rejected with error | E2E | P0 | Pending |
| TC-003 | Email validation | Invalid format "foo@" rejected | Unit | P1 | Pending |
| TC-004 | Rate limit on login | 6th attempt within 1 min returns 429 | Integration | P1 | Pending |

Step 3 — Prioritize

Use this priority scheme:

| Priority | Criteria | Examples | |---|---|---| | P0 (Must test) | Core user flows, data integrity, auth | Login, create, read, update, delete | | P1 (Should test) | Error handling, edge cases, security functional | Invalid input, rate limits, empty states | | P2 (Nice to test) | Boundary values, concurrent access, rare paths | Max-length input, simultaneous edits | | P3 (If time allows) | Cosmetic, UX polish, accessibility | Layout consistency, keyboard navigation |

Step 4 — Coverage Analysis

Compare test cases against spec requirements:

## Coverage Matrix

| Spec Section | Requirements | Test Cases | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authentication | 5 | 12 | 100% |
| User Profile | 3 | 6 | 100% |
| Data Export | 2 | 1 | 50% — missing error path tests |

Output Format

# Test Plan — 

**Generated:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Spec Version:** [commit hash or date]
**Total Test Cases:** N
**Coverage:** X% of spec requirements mapped

## Test Cases by Priority

### P0 — Must Test
[Table of P0 test cases]

### P1 — Should Test
[Table of P1 test cases]

### P2 — Nice to Test
[Table of P2 test cases]

### P3 — If Time Allows
[Table of P3 test cases]

## Coverage Gaps

[List of spec requirements without test cases]

## Test Execution Order

1. [Recommended execution sequence based on dependencies]

Watchdog skill — Test plan generation and coverage analysis

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.