Install
$ agentstack add skill-flonat-claude-research-skill-extract ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Learn: Session Knowledge Extraction
Extract reusable workflows, workarounds, and multi-step procedures discovered during a session into persistent skills. Complementary to the learn-tags rule — while [LEARN] tags record one-liner corrections in MEMORY.md, /skill-extract creates full skill definitions in skills/.
When to Use
- You discovered a non-obvious multi-step procedure
- You built a workaround for a recurring problem
- You developed a workflow that future sessions would benefit from
- the user says "save this as a skill", "learn this", or "remember how to do this"
Phase 1: Evaluate
Before creating anything, answer these 4 self-assessment questions:
- Non-obvious? Would a future session figure this out without help, or would it waste time rediscovering it?
- Future benefit? Will this come up again across sessions or projects?
- Repeatable? Is this a procedure that can be followed step-by-step, or was it a one-off?
- Multi-step? Does it involve 2+ non-trivial steps that benefit from being documented together?
Decision rule: If at least 3 of 4 answers are "yes", proceed to Phase 2. Otherwise, suggest recording as a [LEARN] tag in MEMORY.md instead (simpler, lower overhead).
If borderline, ask the user: > "This seems useful but may not warrant a full skill. Should I create a skill or just add a [LEARN] tag to MEMORY.md?"
Phase 2: Creation Guard + Read Patterns
Run the skill-preflight analysis (see [skills/skill-preflight/SKILL.md](../skill-preflight/SKILL.md)):
- Identify the proposal (name, type, purpose, key functions, keywords)
- Search existing skills and agents for overlap (skill-index scan + keyword grep)
- Analyse overlap and generate a recommendation:
| Recommendation | Criteria | Action | |----------------|----------|--------| | PROCEED | "This is a [workflow/task/agent-delegation/reference]-based skill."
2. Identify resources needed:
- Does the skill need
scripts/for deterministic operations? - Does it need
references/for detailed specs, rubrics, or large examples? - Does it need to delegate to subagents?
3. Draft the architecture — for non-trivial skills, sketch the flow:
Input → [Step A] → REVIEW GATE → [Step B] → Output
Phase 4: Build the Skill
Write skills/{name}/SKILL.md:
Frontmatter
---
name: {kebab-case-name}
description: "{What it does. Concrete task types. Use when...}"
allowed-tools:
- {minimum set of tools needed}
---
Body Structure
The body varies by pattern, but always includes these elements:
# {Skill Name}: {Short Description}
## When to Use
[Activation conditions — natural language triggers and /command]
## {Main Workflow / Processing Rules / Delegation Protocol}
[The core of the skill — structured per the chosen pattern]
## {Anti-Patterns / Never Do These}
[What NOT to do — agents default to generic without constraints]
## Output Format
[What the output looks like]
## Verification
[How to confirm it worked]
Optional sections (add when relevant):
## Defaults— assumptions table to reduce friction## Examples— concrete before/after or good/bad snippets## Notes— edge cases, limitations
Solution Pattern (for debugging/workaround skills)
When the skill captures a fix, workaround, or debugging procedure, use this body structure:
# {Skill Name}: {Short Description}
## Problem
[Specific error message or symptom. Quote the exact text users would see.]
## Context / Triggers
[When this occurs — tool versions, file types, OS, configurations]
## Solution
[Step-by-step fix. Imperative form.]
## Verification
[How to confirm the fix worked]
## Example
[Concrete before/after or input/output]
## Notes
[Edge cases, alternative approaches, when this does NOT apply]
Description Optimization
The description: field in frontmatter is what triggers skill discovery. Write it to match how a user would describe their problem:
- Include specific error messages or symptoms — "Fix
Package biblatex Error: File 'references.bib' not found" - Include context markers — file types, tools, situations where this applies
- Include negative cases — "Not for general proofreading (use /proofread instead)"
- Use natural trigger phrases — the exact words a user would type
Extraction Checklist
During skill creation, mentally verify each point before finalising:
- Trigger coverage — would a user find this skill from 3 different phrasings of the same problem?
- Self-contained — can the skill be followed without reading other files (except
references/)? - Anti-patterns present — at least 2 "don't do this" entries to prevent common mistakes?
- Verification step — does the skill tell you how to confirm it worked?
- Scope bounded — is it clear what this skill does NOT do?
Writing Rules
- Imperative form. "Parse the input" not "You should parse the input."
- Be specific about what NOT to do. Anti-pattern lists are highly effective.
- Include concrete examples. Show expected input/output pairs.
- Keep SKILL.md under 300 lines. Move detail to
references/. - Every instruction must be actionable. No throat-clearing.
- Use tables for structured data. Faster to parse than prose.
Naming Conventions
- Directory and name:
kebab-case, descriptive, 2-4 words - Avoid generic names:
fix-bugis bad;fix-overleaf-sync-conflictis good - Match the trigger: If the natural trigger is "compile my slides", the name should relate to slide compilation
Allowed Tools
Follow principle of least privilege:
| Skill type | Tools | |-----------|-------| | Report-only | Read, Glob, Grep | | File-creating | + Write, Edit | | Shell-needing | + specific Bash(command*) patterns | | Interactive | + AskUserQuestion | | Delegating | + Task |
Phase 5: Validate
Run the validation script on the new skill:
uv run python skills/skill-extract/scripts/validate_skill.py skills/{name}
Fix all errors. Address warnings to improve quality. Use --strict to promote warnings to errors.
The validator checks: frontmatter validity, name format and directory match, description quality, body length, broken links, referenced directories, and placeholder text.
Phase 6: Deploy and Confirm
- Copy the skill to the deployed location (rsync won't run until next session start):
``bash cp -r skills/{name} ~/.claude/skills/{name} ``
- Check that
~/.claude/skills/{name}/SKILL.mdexists - Tell the user: "Created
/{name}— [one-line summary]. It's available immediately in all projects." - If the skill is substantial, suggest updating
docs/components/skills.mdwith the new entry
What This Skill Does NOT Do
- Does not replace
[LEARN]tags — one-liner corrections still go in MEMORY.md via thelearn-tagsrule;/skill-extractis for multi-step procedures, not one-liners - Does not create agents — agents need separate context and persistent memory
- Does not modify existing skills — if an existing skill needs updating, do that directly
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: flonat
- Source: flonat/claude-research
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.