Install
$ agentstack add skill-flonat-flonat-research-compile-knowledge ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Compile Knowledge
> Reads raw inputs from a project and compiles/updates a knowledge/ wiki — a collection of LLM-maintained markdown articles that synthesise everything known about the project's domain.
When to Use
- After a literature review to consolidate findings
- After a series of sessions on a project to build up the knowledge base
- When starting work on a project and wanting to understand the state of knowledge
- Periodically to keep the knowledge wiki fresh
When NOT to Use
- For structural project audits — use
/audit-project-research - For atlas topic metadata — that stays in the vault
- For session-specific notes — those go in
log/
Architecture
The knowledge wiki lives at /knowledge/:
knowledge/
_index.md ← auto-maintained index with brief summaries
concept-name.md ← one article per concept
concept-name-2.md
The LLM owns this directory. the user rarely edits it directly. The value is in the compilation — connecting dots across sources that no single document contains.
Modes
| Mode | Invocation | Behaviour | |------|-----------|-----------| | Interactive (default) | /compile-knowledge [project-path] | Phases run normally; mid-run nudges allowed where useful; end-of-run summary requires no confirmation but the user can inspect output and re-run. | | Autonomous | /compile-knowledge [project-path] --autonomous (or -y) | End-to-end run with zero prompts. All decisions take the documented default. Single end-of-run summary is the only user-facing output. Used by the Saturday wiki-grow cron to refresh project knowledge before the wiki-promotion pass. |
Autonomous-mode defaults (every choice point)
When --autonomous / -y is set, the skill takes these defaults silently:
| Choice point | Default | |-------------|---------| | Project path unresolved (CWD not a research project) | Fail with a single one-line error to stderr. Do not prompt for path. | | No sources found in Phase 1 | Skip remaining phases; emit No sources to compile. and exit clean. | | Concept granularity uncertain | Prefer 400-600 word articles, specific scope over generic. Err on the side of fewer, sharper concepts. | | Article exists but scope shifted | Update in place when overlap ≥50% with new finding; create new article only when genuinely orthogonal. | | Contradictions between sources | Flag explicitly in prose ("Source A says X, Source B says Y") — never silently pick a side. | | Source can't be parsed (encoding, malformed) | Log to the Gaps section in _index.md; continue with remaining sources. | | Atlas topic match in Phase 5 is 0 or >1 | Skip silently (already documented in Phase 5.4). | | Article exceeds 1000 words | Split into two articles by sub-theme; never truncate findings. |
Autonomous-mode does NOT change
- Knowledge-article quality contract: every claim must cite its source. Unverifiable claims get
[UNVERIFIED]per the global rule. - Phase 5 atlas frontmatter sync: still writes
knowledge_last_compiledon every run. - Read-only access to
data/raw/per the global data-sensitivity rule. - Per-project
MEMORY.md/CLAUDE.mdare NEVER edited by this skill.
If any of the above fails (e.g. an [UNVERIFIED] flag couldn't be applied due to a write error), include the failure in the end-of-run summary rather than blocking.
Phase 1: Locate Project and Scan Sources
- Resolve project path (CWD or argument)
- Scan for raw inputs:
| Source | Location | What to extract | |--------|----------|----------------| | Literature reviews | docs/literature-review/ | Paper summaries, key findings, research gaps | | Meeting notes | meeting-notes/ or to-sort/ recaps | Decisions, insights, action items | | Session logs | log/ | Research progress, discoveries, pivots | | MEMORY.md | Project root | Notation, decisions, pitfalls, domain corrections | | Atlas topic file | ~/vault/atlas//.md | Status, connected topics, research questions | | Code README/comments | code/, src/ | What the code does, key algorithms | | Paper sections | paper-*/paper/*.tex | Current argument structure, contributions | | .context/project-recap.md | .context/ | Project overview, current state |
- Report source inventory:
`` Sources found: Literature: 12 papers in docs/literature-review/ Sessions: 8 logs in log/ Memory: 14 entries in MEMORY.md Paper: 3 sections drafted Code: 2 scripts in code/python/ ``
Phase 2: Identify Concepts
Read all sources and extract a concept list — the key ideas, methods, datasets, theories, and phenomena that the project deals with.
Concept granularity: Each concept should be specific enough to warrant its own article (~200-1000 words). Too broad = useless summary. Too narrow = fragmented.
Examples of good concepts:
mechanism-design-for-audits.md(a specific method applied to the project's domain)collusion-detection-methods.md(a family of techniques relevant to the project)eu-ets-carbon-market.md(institutional context)callaway-santanna-estimator.md(a specific estimator used)
Examples of bad concepts:
introduction.md(too structural — that's the paper's job)regression.md(too generic)table-3.md(too narrow)
Phase 3: Compile Articles
For each concept, create or update knowledge/.md:
#
> One-sentence summary of what this concept is and why it matters to the project.
## Key Findings
- Bullet points synthesising what is known from all sources
- Each finding should cite its source: (Author Year) or (session log YYYY-MM-DD)
- Flag contradictions: "Source A says X, but Source B says Y"
## Open Questions
- What is not yet known or resolved
- Questions that emerged from the literature but aren't answered
- Methodological choices that remain open
## Sources
| Source | Type | Key contribution |
|--------|------|-----------------|
| Author (Year) | Paper | Finding X |
| Session 2026-03-15 | Log | Discovered Y |
| MEMORY.md | Decision | Chose Z because... |
## Related
- [[other-concept]] — how they connect
- Atlas: `` — link to atlas topic if relevant
Rules:
- Be specific and factual — no filler prose
- Cite sources for every claim
- Flag contradictions explicitly rather than silently picking one side
- Keep articles between 200-1000 words
- Use
[[wikilink]]syntax for cross-references between knowledge articles
Phase 4: Update Index
Write or update knowledge/_index.md:
# Knowledge Index
> Auto-maintained by `/compile-knowledge`. Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD.
> N articles, ~X words total.
## Articles
| Article | Summary | Sources | Last updated |
|---------|---------|---------|-------------|
| [Concept A](concept-a.md) | One-line summary | 3 papers, 2 sessions | YYYY-MM-DD |
| [Concept B](concept-b.md) | One-line summary | 1 paper, 1 decision | YYYY-MM-DD |
## Source Coverage
| Source type | Count | Compiled into articles |
|------------|-------|----------------------|
| Papers | 12 | 10 (2 not yet compiled) |
| Session logs | 8 | 5 (3 not yet compiled) |
| Memory entries | 14 | 12 |
## Gaps
- [List concepts that should exist but don't yet]
- [Sources not yet compiled into any article]
Phase 5: Atlas frontmatter sync
After writing _index.md, also update the atlas topic frontmatter so the project's compile date is discoverable from outside the project (e.g. by /session-close, the wiki promotion cron, atlas-workspace).
- Resolve the atlas topic:
grep -rl "project_path:.*$(basename "$PWD")" ~/vault/atlas/ - If a single match is found, set or update the frontmatter field
knowledge_last_compiled: YYYY-MM-DD (today's date in UTC).
- If the field already exists, overwrite. If absent, insert before the
closing ---.
- If 0 or >1 atlas topic files match, skip silently and log to the
end-of-run summary (Atlas frontmatter sync: skipped — N matches).
The field is consumed by:
/session-close(info-only freshness line via
references/research-checks.md § 18)
- The Saturday
wiki-growcron (uses the date to schedule re-promotion) - atlas-workspace (could surface in topic-page metadata row in future)
Phase 6: Incremental Mode
When run on a project that already has knowledge/:
- Detect new sources since last compilation (check
_index.mdlast-updated date vs source file modification dates) - Only process new/modified sources
- Update existing articles with new findings (append, don't rewrite)
- Create new articles only for genuinely new concepts
- Update
_index.md - Update atlas frontmatter
knowledge_last_compiled(Phase 5)
Report:
Knowledge updated:
Articles updated: 3 (concept-a, concept-b, concept-c)
Articles created: 1 (new-concept)
Sources processed: 4 new since last compile
Total: N articles, ~X words
Output
Print summary after compilation:
Knowledge compiled for :
Articles: N (M new, K updated)
Total words: ~X
Sources compiled: Y / Z total
Gaps: [list any uncompiled sources]
Index: knowledge/_index.md
Cross-References
| Skill | Relationship | |-------|-------------| | /store-insight | Lightweight single-finding filer — called by other skills | | /knowledge-lint | Checks compiled knowledge for inconsistencies | | /literature (pipeline mode) | Produces literature reviews that feed into compilation | | /session-close | Extracts session insights and files them via /store-insight |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: flonat
- Source: flonat/flonat-research
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.