AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Handrail

skill-foreversc-ai-handrail-ai-handrail · by ForeverSc

Use when working with legacy projects, old codebases, or inherited systems that need modernization. Triggers when user mentions legacy code, old project, inherited codebase, technical debt, legacy refactoring, safe modernization, understanding an unfamiliar large codebase before making changes, AI化改造, AI-friendly modernization, make this project AI-ready, or modernize this project.

No reviews yet
0 installs
4 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-foreversc-ai-handrail-ai-handrail

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Ai Handrail? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AI Handrail — Legacy Project Modernization Suite

A skill suite for incrementally making legacy projects AI-friendly. Core principle: add handrails first, then refactor.

When to Use

  • Inheriting or onboarding to a large existing codebase
  • Planning modernization of legacy systems
  • Needing to understand old code before making changes
  • Adding AI-assisted development to projects without docs/tests
  • Reducing risk of breaking changes in critical business systems

When NOT to Use

  • Greenfield projects
  • Small scripts or utilities with obvious structure
  • Projects already well-documented with comprehensive test suites

Project Type Profiles

Discovery (Phase 0) automatically detects the project type and loads a corresponding profile from skills/legacy-discovery/profiles/. Profiles provide stack-specific reconnaissance checklists, critical path patterns, risk labels, and structural analysis tools.

| Profile | File | Triggers | |---------|------|----------| | Frontend | profiles/frontend.md | React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, etc. | | Backend-Node | profiles/backend-node.md | Express, Fastify, NestJS, Koa, etc. | | Backend-Java | profiles/backend-java.md | Spring Boot, Quarkus, Jakarta EE, etc. | | Backend-Python | profiles/backend-python.md | Django, Flask, FastAPI, etc. | | Backend-Go | profiles/backend-go.md | Go with gin, echo, chi, net/http, etc. | | Fullstack | profiles/fullstack.md | Both frontend + backend signals detected |

Profiles extend the base workflow — they add stack-specific checks without replacing core steps. Subsequent skills (doc-bootstrap, safety-rails, refactor-plan) use the detected project type to apply profile-aware guidance.

Sub-Skills

This suite contains 4 skills used in sequence, plus an orchestrator for guided end-to-end experience:

Orchestrator → legacy-kickstart (Recommended Starting Point)

One-click guided modernization. Read skills/legacy-kickstart/SKILL.md. Use when: You want a full guided experience — project scan, modernization plan, then automated phased execution. Best for first-time users or when starting fresh on a large legacy project.

Phase 0 → legacy-discovery

Understand the project. Read skills/legacy-discovery/SKILL.md. Use when: Starting work on an unfamiliar legacy project.

Phase 1 → legacy-doc-bootstrap

Create AI-consumable documentation. Read skills/legacy-doc-bootstrap/SKILL.md. Use when: Discovery is complete and knowledge needs to be persisted.

Phase 2 → legacy-safety-rails

Build guardrails. Read skills/legacy-safety-rails/SKILL.md. Use when: Documentation exists but no safety nets protect refactoring.

Phase 3 → legacy-refactor-plan

Plan safe, incremental changes. Read skills/legacy-refactor-plan/SKILL.md. Use when: Guardrails are in place and actual code changes are needed.

Hard Rules (apply to ALL sub-skills)

  1. No full-project scans. Analyze one domain / critical path / subsystem per round.
  2. Lockfile is truth. Read package-lock.json, yarn.lock, Gemfile.lock, poetry.lock, go.sum, etc. Never assume latest versions.
  3. Project code is primary reference. Existing implementations beat external documentation.
  4. High-impact old dependencies require source-backed verification. If an outdated dependency has a large blast radius, you must review the lockfile, project code, and package source code for the pinned version instead of trusting generic examples.
  5. 80/20 rule. Identify P0 critical paths first. Don't chase completeness in round one.
  6. Complex logic needs a flowchart. State-heavy and branch-heavy legacy behavior must be documented visually.
  7. Non-standard behavior must be tagged. Hidden traps and counter-intuitive side effects should be recorded explicitly, not left implicit.
  8. No hidden assumptions. If something is unknown, mark it UNKNOWN — never guess silently.
  9. Human checkpoints are non-negotiable. Business rules, schema changes, deletions, and behavioral changes require explicit human approval.
  10. Guardrails before depth. Tests → observability → feature flags → rollback plan → then refactor.
  11. No source edits before tests exist. TEST-MISSING or missing module-to-test mapping means add tests first, then change code.

Risk Labels

Tag every module/area analyzed. Full label definitions in docs/naming.md.

  • P0-CRITICAL — core revenue/safety path
  • HIGH-RISK — complex, fragile, or undertested
  • LEGACY-SEALED — do not touch without explicit approval
  • SAFE-TO-EXTRACT — low coupling, safe to isolate
  • DOC-MISSING / TEST-MISSING — prerequisite work needed before changes
  • HUMAN-REVIEW — requires human sign-off
  • DEAD-CODE — unused code, mark as AI-ignorable
  • CIRCULAR-DEP — circular dependency, high coupling risk
  • HOTSPOT — frequently modified file, high bug probability

Profile-specific labels (e.g., GLOBAL-CSS, GOROUTINE-LEAK, CONTRACT-DRIFT) are defined in each profile and in docs/naming.md.

Per-Round Completion Criteria

Every analysis round must answer exactly 4 questions:

  1. What specific area was analyzed this round?
  2. What has been confirmed?
  3. What remains unknown?
  4. What should be analyzed next and why?

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.