Install
$ agentstack add skill-gaia-computer-technologies-architecture-skills-design-brief ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Design Brief
Generate a structured design brief from a conversation or loose notes. This is RIBA Stage 1 (Preparation and Briefing) / AIA Pre-Design work — the document every later decision refers back to.
When to use
When an architect or designer needs to formalise design intent — from a client conversation, a set of references, a site visit, or their own sketched notes. The brief becomes the project's north star: what gets built starts here.
Input
The user provides raw input in any form:
- A transcript or notes from a client meeting
- A list of rooms and requirements
- A mood description: "We want it to feel like a Japanese ryokan but in Brooklyn"
- A set of constraints: budget, site, timeline, programme
- An image or set of references (if image input is available)
Process
- Extract core requirements. Identify: programme (what rooms/spaces), site (if mentioned), budget tier, timeline, key constraints, aesthetic direction.
- Identify unstated assumptions. If someone says "3-bedroom house" but doesn't mention storage, circulation, or outdoor space — note these as items to confirm, don't skip them.
- Organise into sections following architectural brief convention:
- Project overview (one paragraph)
- Programme (spatial requirements table)
- Site and context (if known)
- Design intent and aesthetic direction
- Material preferences
- Sustainability and environmental goals
- Budget and phasing
- Open questions (what still needs resolving)
- Write in the architect's voice. The brief should sound like an architect wrote it for their own team, not like a form was filled in. Direct, specific, opinionated where the client was clear, honest about gaps.
Domain knowledge
Programme defaults by project type
These are professional conventions and typical ranges — not codes, not client requirements. Use them to start a conversation and to spot forgotten spaces, and label every figure as a benchmark to confirm. Areas vary widely by market, site, and brief. When you carry a number into the brief, show its basis (e.g. "living at 25–35% of a 130–180m² residential programme").
Single-family residential (3-bed):
- Living, dining, kitchen (often open plan): 45-65m²
- Primary bedroom with ensuite: 20-28m²
- Secondary bedrooms (x2): 12-16m² each
- Family bathroom: 6-8m²
- Entrance/circulation: 8-12m²
- Storage (often forgotten): 4-8m²
- Outdoor space: context-dependent
- Utility/laundry: 4-6m²
- Total: 130-180m² (typical, varies by market)
Small office (10-20 people):
- Open workspace: 5-8m² per person
- Meeting rooms: 1 per 6-8 people, 12-16m² each
- Focus/phone rooms: 1 per 10 people, 4m²
- Kitchen/break area: 15-25m²
- Reception: 10-15m²
- Storage/server: 6-10m²
Restaurant (40-60 covers):
- Dining area: 1.2-1.8m² per cover
- Kitchen: 30-40% of dining area
- Bar: 8-15m²
- WC (accessible + gendered or all-gender): 12-18m²
- Storage/staff: 10-15m²
- Outdoor dining: context-dependent
Budget tier language
- Modest: standard materials, practical choices, value-engineered details
- Mid-range: good quality materials, some custom elements, considered details
- High-end: premium materials throughout, bespoke joinery, architectural hardware
- Luxury: no material constraints, fully custom, specialist craftspeople
Sustainability defaults
If the user doesn't mention sustainability, include a section noting:
- Passive design strategies appropriate to climate
- Material longevity over novelty
- Energy performance targets (reference local standards)
- Note: "Sustainability goals to be confirmed with client"
Output format
DESIGN BRIEF
═════════════
PROJECT OVERVIEW
[One paragraph summary: what, where, who, why]
PROGRAMME
┌──────────────────────┬────────┬──────────────────────────┐
│ Space │ Area │ Notes │
├──────────────────────┼────────┼──────────────────────────┤
│ [room] │ [m²] │ [adjacency, light, use] │
└──────────────────────┴────────┴──────────────────────────┘
Total: [x] m² (approx.)
SITE & CONTEXT
[If known. Orientation, access, neighbours, constraints.]
DESIGN INTENT
[Aesthetic direction, spatial quality, references. 2-3 paragraphs.]
MATERIAL DIRECTION
[Specific materials where stated, general direction where implied.]
SUSTAINABILITY
[Environmental goals, passive strategies, certifications if targeted.]
BUDGET & PHASING
[Tier, total if stated, phasing approach if relevant.]
OPEN QUESTIONS
- [Items that need resolving before schematic design begins]
What you don't do
- Don't invent requirements the client didn't mention. Flag gaps in "Open Questions".
- Don't use generic language: "a welcoming entrance" tells no one anything. Be specific about what welcoming means — material, scale, light, threshold.
- Don't include cost estimates unless the user provides budget data.
- Don't assume location-specific codes. Note "verify local requirements" where relevant.
Guardrails
- Programme areas are benchmarks to confirm, never requirements. Show the basis of any figure you use.
- Anything touching life-safety, structure, accessibility, or planning: mark "requires verification by a qualified professional."
Hand off to
- programme-schedule — turn the programme into a checked schedule of accommodation with explicit net-to-gross.
- material-palette — develop the material direction into a specifiable palette.
- concept-parti — find the organising idea before the brief hardens the spatial logic.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gaia-computer-technologies
- Source: gaia-computer-technologies/architecture-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.gaia.computer/skills
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.