AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Design Brief

skill-gaia-computer-technologies-architecture-skills-design-brief · by gaia-computer-technologies

Turn a client conversation, loose notes, or a mood description into a structured architectural design brief — programme, site, design intent, materials, sustainability, budget, and open questions. Use when an architect needs to formalise design intent at RIBA Stage 1 / AIA Pre-Design, wants to "write a brief", "structure this client meeting", or turn a vague idea into a project north-star. Pairs…

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-gaia-computer-technologies-architecture-skills-design-brief

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-gaia-computer-technologies-architecture-skills-design-brief)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Design Brief? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Design Brief

Generate a structured design brief from a conversation or loose notes. This is RIBA Stage 1 (Preparation and Briefing) / AIA Pre-Design work — the document every later decision refers back to.

When to use

When an architect or designer needs to formalise design intent — from a client conversation, a set of references, a site visit, or their own sketched notes. The brief becomes the project's north star: what gets built starts here.

Input

The user provides raw input in any form:

  • A transcript or notes from a client meeting
  • A list of rooms and requirements
  • A mood description: "We want it to feel like a Japanese ryokan but in Brooklyn"
  • A set of constraints: budget, site, timeline, programme
  • An image or set of references (if image input is available)

Process

  1. Extract core requirements. Identify: programme (what rooms/spaces), site (if mentioned), budget tier, timeline, key constraints, aesthetic direction.
  1. Identify unstated assumptions. If someone says "3-bedroom house" but doesn't mention storage, circulation, or outdoor space — note these as items to confirm, don't skip them.
  1. Organise into sections following architectural brief convention:
  • Project overview (one paragraph)
  • Programme (spatial requirements table)
  • Site and context (if known)
  • Design intent and aesthetic direction
  • Material preferences
  • Sustainability and environmental goals
  • Budget and phasing
  • Open questions (what still needs resolving)
  1. Write in the architect's voice. The brief should sound like an architect wrote it for their own team, not like a form was filled in. Direct, specific, opinionated where the client was clear, honest about gaps.

Domain knowledge

Programme defaults by project type

These are professional conventions and typical ranges — not codes, not client requirements. Use them to start a conversation and to spot forgotten spaces, and label every figure as a benchmark to confirm. Areas vary widely by market, site, and brief. When you carry a number into the brief, show its basis (e.g. "living at 25–35% of a 130–180m² residential programme").

Single-family residential (3-bed):

  • Living, dining, kitchen (often open plan): 45-65m²
  • Primary bedroom with ensuite: 20-28m²
  • Secondary bedrooms (x2): 12-16m² each
  • Family bathroom: 6-8m²
  • Entrance/circulation: 8-12m²
  • Storage (often forgotten): 4-8m²
  • Outdoor space: context-dependent
  • Utility/laundry: 4-6m²
  • Total: 130-180m² (typical, varies by market)

Small office (10-20 people):

  • Open workspace: 5-8m² per person
  • Meeting rooms: 1 per 6-8 people, 12-16m² each
  • Focus/phone rooms: 1 per 10 people, 4m²
  • Kitchen/break area: 15-25m²
  • Reception: 10-15m²
  • Storage/server: 6-10m²

Restaurant (40-60 covers):

  • Dining area: 1.2-1.8m² per cover
  • Kitchen: 30-40% of dining area
  • Bar: 8-15m²
  • WC (accessible + gendered or all-gender): 12-18m²
  • Storage/staff: 10-15m²
  • Outdoor dining: context-dependent

Budget tier language

  • Modest: standard materials, practical choices, value-engineered details
  • Mid-range: good quality materials, some custom elements, considered details
  • High-end: premium materials throughout, bespoke joinery, architectural hardware
  • Luxury: no material constraints, fully custom, specialist craftspeople

Sustainability defaults

If the user doesn't mention sustainability, include a section noting:

  • Passive design strategies appropriate to climate
  • Material longevity over novelty
  • Energy performance targets (reference local standards)
  • Note: "Sustainability goals to be confirmed with client"

Output format

DESIGN BRIEF
═════════════

PROJECT OVERVIEW
[One paragraph summary: what, where, who, why]

PROGRAMME
┌──────────────────────┬────────┬──────────────────────────┐
│ Space                │ Area   │ Notes                    │
├──────────────────────┼────────┼──────────────────────────┤
│ [room]               │ [m²]   │ [adjacency, light, use]  │
└──────────────────────┴────────┴──────────────────────────┘
Total: [x] m² (approx.)

SITE & CONTEXT
[If known. Orientation, access, neighbours, constraints.]

DESIGN INTENT
[Aesthetic direction, spatial quality, references. 2-3 paragraphs.]

MATERIAL DIRECTION
[Specific materials where stated, general direction where implied.]

SUSTAINABILITY
[Environmental goals, passive strategies, certifications if targeted.]

BUDGET & PHASING
[Tier, total if stated, phasing approach if relevant.]

OPEN QUESTIONS
- [Items that need resolving before schematic design begins]

What you don't do

  • Don't invent requirements the client didn't mention. Flag gaps in "Open Questions".
  • Don't use generic language: "a welcoming entrance" tells no one anything. Be specific about what welcoming means — material, scale, light, threshold.
  • Don't include cost estimates unless the user provides budget data.
  • Don't assume location-specific codes. Note "verify local requirements" where relevant.

Guardrails

  • Programme areas are benchmarks to confirm, never requirements. Show the basis of any figure you use.
  • Anything touching life-safety, structure, accessibility, or planning: mark "requires verification by a qualified professional."

Hand off to

  • programme-schedule — turn the programme into a checked schedule of accommodation with explicit net-to-gross.
  • material-palette — develop the material direction into a specifiable palette.
  • concept-parti — find the organising idea before the brief hardens the spatial logic.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.