AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ux Engineering

skill-galaxyruler-galactic-skills-ux-engineering · by GalaxyRuler

UX engineering and product design — JTBD research, information architecture, WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, design systems, interaction design, and measurement (HEART/SUS). Use when designing user interfaces, conducting UX research, building design systems, reviewing accessibility compliance, planning usability testing, defining product metrics, writing JTBD statements, structuring information archit…

No reviews yet
0 installs
17 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-galaxyruler-galactic-skills-ux-engineering

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-galaxyruler-galactic-skills-ux-engineering)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
17d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ux Engineering? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

UX Engineering & Product Design

Authoritative, empirical, and standards-based methodology for architecting, designing, testing, and deploying digital experiences.

Operational workflow

  1. Discovery & research — define target market by Job to be Done (JTBD), not demographics. Map the Universal Job Map (Define, Locate, Prepare, Confirm, Execute, Monitor, Modify, Conclude).
  2. Information architecture — organize via the three circles (Users, Content, Context). Build organization, labeling, navigation, and search systems.
  3. Design & prototyping — build from foundational design tokens. Map UI components to semantic roles. Apply ISO 9241-110 dialogue principles.
  4. Accessibility integration — WCAG 2.2 AA via progressive enhancement on all structures.
  5. Testing & iteration — validate flows via qualitative usability testing with representative users.
  6. Measurement & optimization — track quality with HEART framework and System Usability Scale (SUS).

JTBD research

  • Outcomes, not features. Formula: "When [circumstance], I want to [job], so I can [outcome] without [pain point]".
  • Three customer roles: Job Executor, Product Lifecycle Support Team, Buyer.
  • Solution-agnostic interviews: ask about workarounds, prior solutions, and anxieties. Ignore your specific software during discovery.

Information architecture

  • Clear labeling — no internal jargon; use the user's domain terms.
  • Progressive disclosure — hide complexity until requested. Improves "Suitability for Learning".
  • Content portability — structure content flexibly for multi-platform delivery (responsive web, mobile, voice).

Interaction design

  • Dialogue principles (ISO 9241-110): suitability for task, self-descriptiveness, controllability, error tolerance.
  • Spatial hierarchy: use Z-depth and materials (translucent Acrylic, Liquid Glass) to separate transient controls from base content. Never use heavy transparent materials in the primary content layer.
  • Motion: provide feedback and context. Respect system accessibility settings — animations must be disableable (WCAG 2.3.3).

Design systems

  • Design tokens — all colors, typography, spacing via semantic tokens (e.g., --p-color-text-subdued, color.text.brand), never hardcoded hex.
  • Forms — identify input purposes programmatically (WCAG 1.3.5) for browser auto-fill. Errors identified in text (3.3.1), with correction suggestions (3.3.3), reversible/confirmable for financial/legal data (3.3.4).
  • Focus states — highly visible, contrast ratio >= 3:1 against adjacent pixels (WCAG 2.4.13).
  • Navigation — consistent relative order across pages (WCAG 3.2.3, 3.2.6).

Accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA)

  • Contrast: 4.5:1 minimum for standard text, 3:1 for large text and essential non-text UI components. Color never sole means of conveying information.
  • Target sizing: >= 24x24 CSS px (AA minimum), 44x44 CSS px (AAA enhanced).
  • Authentication: no sole reliance on cognitive function tests without alternatives or assistive mechanisms (password managers, object recognition).
  • Redundant entry: auto-populate or provide selection for previously entered data within a process.
  • Reflow: content scales to 400% (320px equivalent width) without two-dimensional scrolling.

Anti-patterns

  1. Output over outcomes — goals based on feature delivery rather than user behavioral changes.
  2. Generic AI audit trap — unspecialized generative AI for heuristic evaluations yields ~80% false-positive rate and can actively harm conversions.
  3. Altering validated surveys — modifying SUS question phrasing invalidates the test and prevents benchmarking.
  4. Persona abstraction — demographic-heavy personas lacking functional/emotional/social job context.
  5. Conversion-only tracking — binary business metrics without experiential correlation (task success, happiness).

Design critiques

  • No subjective visual preference arguments.
  • Frame critiques around validated user needs using POV statements and HMW questions.
  • Justify and document decisions, especially usability/security/performance trade-offs.

Checklists, testing methods, metrics

Pre-design/pre-dev/pre-launch checklists, testing methodology (moderated, unmoderated, tree testing, A/B), HEART/GSM framework, SUS scoring, completion criteria: [TESTING-METRICS.md](TESTING-METRICS.md).

Source gaps

  • Visual framework conflict (Apple HIG vs Google Material): Material = bold physical metaphors, brand flexibility, cross-platform. HIG = content deference, minimalism, platform consistency. Use Material for cross-platform MVPs, HIG for iOS-native premium.
  • JTBD vs Personas: industry disagreement on compatibility. Some treat JTBD as persona replacement, others as complementary ("JTBD Personas").
  • Mobile specifics: sources lack granular component-level best practices for mobile tutorial flows, gestural onboarding, wearables, or foldables.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.