— No reviews yet
0 installs
15 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-geniushtx-swe-skills-bench-python-performance-optimization ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ● Network access Used
- ● Filesystem access Used
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Python Performance Optimization? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Python Performance Optimization
Comprehensive guide to profiling, analyzing, and optimizing Python code for better performance, including CPU profiling, memory optimization, and implementation best practices.
When to Use This Skill
- Identifying performance bottlenecks in Python applications
- Reducing application latency and response times
- Optimizing CPU-intensive operations
- Reducing memory consumption and memory leaks
- Improving database query performance
- Optimizing I/O operations
- Speeding up data processing pipelines
- Implementing high-performance algorithms
- Profiling production applications
Core Concepts
1. Profiling Types
- CPU Profiling: Identify time-consuming functions
- Memory Profiling: Track memory allocation and leaks
- Line Profiling: Profile at line-by-line granularity
- Call Graph: Visualize function call relationships
2. Performance Metrics
- Execution Time: How long operations take
- Memory Usage: Peak and average memory consumption
- CPU Utilization: Processor usage patterns
- I/O Wait: Time spent on I/O operations
3. Optimization Strategies
- Algorithmic: Better algorithms and data structures
- Implementation: More efficient code patterns
- Parallelization: Multi-threading/processing
- Caching: Avoid redundant computation
- Native Extensions: C/Rust for critical paths
Quick Start
Basic Timing
import time
def measure_time():
"""Simple timing measurement."""
start = time.time()
# Your code here
result = sum(range(1000000))
elapsed = time.time() - start
print(f"Execution time: {elapsed:.4f} seconds")
return result
# Better: use timeit for accurate measurements
import timeit
execution_time = timeit.timeit(
"sum(range(1000000))",
number=100
)
print(f"Average time: {execution_time/100:.6f} seconds")
Profiling Tools
Pattern 1: cProfile - CPU Profiling
import cProfile
import pstats
from pstats import SortKey
def slow_function():
"""Function to profile."""
total = 0
for i in range(1000000):
total += i
return total
def another_function():
"""Another function."""
return [i**2 for i in range(100000)]
def main():
"""Main function to profile."""
result1 = slow_function()
result2 = another_function()
return result1, result2
# Profile the code
if __name__ == "__main__":
profiler = cProfile.Profile()
profiler.enable()
main()
profiler.disable()
# Print stats
stats = pstats.Stats(profiler)
stats.sort_stats(SortKey.CUMULATIVE)
stats.print_stats(10) # Top 10 functions
# Save to file for later analysis
stats.dump_stats("profile_output.prof")
Command-line profiling:
# Profile a script
python -m cProfile -o output.prof script.py
# View results
python -m pstats output.prof
# In pstats:
# sort cumtime
# stats 10
Pattern 2: line_profiler - Line-by-Line Profiling
# Install: pip install line-profiler
# Add @profile decorator (line_profiler provides this)
@profile
def process_data(data):
"""Process data with line profiling."""
result = []
for item in data:
processed = item * 2
result.append(processed)
return result
# Run with:
# kernprof -l -v script.py
Manual line profiling:
from line_profiler import LineProfiler
def process_data(data):
"""Function to profile."""
result = []
for item in data:
processed = item * 2
result.append(processed)
return result
if __name__ == "__main__":
lp = LineProfiler()
lp.add_function(process_data)
data = list(range(100000))
lp_wrapper = lp(process_data)
lp_wrapper(data)
lp.print_stats()
Pattern 3: memory_profiler - Memory Usage
# Install: pip install memory-profiler
from memory_profiler import profile
@profile
def memory_intensive():
"""Function that uses lots of memory."""
# Create large list
big_list = [i for i in range(1000000)]
# Create large dict
big_dict = {i: i**2 for i in range(100000)}
# Process data
result = sum(big_list)
return result
if __name__ == "__main__":
memory_intensive()
# Run with:
# python -m memory_profiler script.py
Pattern 4: py-spy - Production Profiling
# Install: pip install py-spy
# Profile a running Python process
py-spy top --pid 12345
# Generate flamegraph
py-spy record -o profile.svg --pid 12345
# Profile a script
py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python script.py
# Dump current call stack
py-spy dump --pid 12345
Optimization Patterns
Pattern 5: List Comprehensions vs Loops
import timeit
# Slow: Traditional loop
def slow_squares(n):
"""Create list of squares using loop."""
result = []
for i in range(n):
result.append(i**2)
return result
# Fast: List comprehension
def fast_squares(n):
"""Create list of squares using comprehension."""
return [i**2 for i in range(n)]
# Benchmark
n = 100000
slow_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: slow_squares(n), number=100)
fast_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: fast_squares(n), number=100)
print(f"Loop: {slow_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Comprehension: {fast_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {slow_time/fast_time:.2f}x")
# Even faster for simple operations: map
def faster_squares(n):
"""Use map for even better performance."""
return list(map(lambda x: x**2, range(n)))
Pattern 6: Generator Expressions for Memory
import sys
def list_approach():
"""Memory-intensive list."""
data = [i**2 for i in range(1000000)]
return sum(data)
def generator_approach():
"""Memory-efficient generator."""
data = (i**2 for i in range(1000000))
return sum(data)
# Memory comparison
list_data = [i for i in range(1000000)]
gen_data = (i for i in range(1000000))
print(f"List size: {sys.getsizeof(list_data)} bytes")
print(f"Generator size: {sys.getsizeof(gen_data)} bytes")
# Generators use constant memory regardless of size
Pattern 7: String Concatenation
import timeit
def slow_concat(items):
"""Slow string concatenation."""
result = ""
for item in items:
result += str(item)
return result
def fast_concat(items):
"""Fast string concatenation with join."""
return "".join(str(item) for item in items)
def faster_concat(items):
"""Even faster with list."""
parts = [str(item) for item in items]
return "".join(parts)
items = list(range(10000))
# Benchmark
slow = timeit.timeit(lambda: slow_concat(items), number=100)
fast = timeit.timeit(lambda: fast_concat(items), number=100)
faster = timeit.timeit(lambda: faster_concat(items), number=100)
print(f"Concatenation (+): {slow:.4f}s")
print(f"Join (generator): {fast:.4f}s")
print(f"Join (list): {faster:.4f}s")
Pattern 8: Dictionary Lookups vs List Searches
import timeit
# Create test data
size = 10000
items = list(range(size))
lookup_dict = {i: i for i in range(size)}
def list_search(items, target):
"""O(n) search in list."""
return target in items
def dict_search(lookup_dict, target):
"""O(1) search in dict."""
return target in lookup_dict
target = size - 1 # Worst case for list
# Benchmark
list_time = timeit.timeit(
lambda: list_search(items, target),
number=1000
)
dict_time = timeit.timeit(
lambda: dict_search(lookup_dict, target),
number=1000
)
print(f"List search: {list_time:.6f}s")
print(f"Dict search: {dict_time:.6f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {list_time/dict_time:.0f}x")
Pattern 9: Local Variable Access
import timeit
# Global variable (slow)
GLOBAL_VALUE = 100
def use_global():
"""Access global variable."""
total = 0
for i in range(10000):
total += GLOBAL_VALUE
return total
def use_local():
"""Use local variable."""
local_value = 100
total = 0
for i in range(10000):
total += local_value
return total
# Local is faster
global_time = timeit.timeit(use_global, number=1000)
local_time = timeit.timeit(use_local, number=1000)
print(f"Global access: {global_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Local access: {local_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {global_time/local_time:.2f}x")
Pattern 10: Function Call Overhead
import timeit
def calculate_inline():
"""Inline calculation."""
total = 0
for i in range(10000):
total += i * 2 + 1
return total
def helper_function(x):
"""Helper function."""
return x * 2 + 1
def calculate_with_function():
"""Calculation with function calls."""
total = 0
for i in range(10000):
total += helper_function(i)
return total
# Inline is faster due to no call overhead
inline_time = timeit.timeit(calculate_inline, number=1000)
function_time = timeit.timeit(calculate_with_function, number=1000)
print(f"Inline: {inline_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Function calls: {function_time:.4f}s")
Advanced Optimization
Pattern 11: NumPy for Numerical Operations
import timeit
import numpy as np
def python_sum(n):
"""Sum using pure Python."""
return sum(range(n))
def numpy_sum(n):
"""Sum using NumPy."""
return np.arange(n).sum()
n = 1000000
python_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: python_sum(n), number=100)
numpy_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: numpy_sum(n), number=100)
print(f"Python: {python_time:.4f}s")
print(f"NumPy: {numpy_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {python_time/numpy_time:.2f}x")
# Vectorized operations
def python_multiply():
"""Element-wise multiplication in Python."""
a = list(range(100000))
b = list(range(100000))
return [x * y for x, y in zip(a, b)]
def numpy_multiply():
"""Vectorized multiplication in NumPy."""
a = np.arange(100000)
b = np.arange(100000)
return a * b
py_time = timeit.timeit(python_multiply, number=100)
np_time = timeit.timeit(numpy_multiply, number=100)
print(f"\nPython multiply: {py_time:.4f}s")
print(f"NumPy multiply: {np_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {py_time/np_time:.2f}x")
Pattern 12: Caching with functools.lru_cache
from functools import lru_cache
import timeit
def fibonacci_slow(n):
"""Recursive fibonacci without caching."""
if n < 2:
return n
return fibonacci_slow(n-1) + fibonacci_slow(n-2)
@lru_cache(maxsize=None)
def fibonacci_fast(n):
"""Recursive fibonacci with caching."""
if n < 2:
return n
return fibonacci_fast(n-1) + fibonacci_fast(n-2)
# Massive speedup for recursive algorithms
n = 30
slow_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: fibonacci_slow(n), number=1)
fast_time = timeit.timeit(lambda: fibonacci_fast(n), number=1000)
print(f"Without cache (1 run): {slow_time:.4f}s")
print(f"With cache (1000 runs): {fast_time:.4f}s")
# Cache info
print(f"Cache info: {fibonacci_fast.cache_info()}")
Pattern 13: Using slots for Memory
import sys
class RegularClass:
"""Regular class with __dict__."""
def __init__(self, x, y, z):
self.x = x
self.y = y
self.z = z
class SlottedClass:
"""Class with __slots__ for memory efficiency."""
__slots__ = ['x', 'y', 'z']
def __init__(self, x, y, z):
self.x = x
self.y = y
self.z = z
# Memory comparison
regular = RegularClass(1, 2, 3)
slotted = SlottedClass(1, 2, 3)
print(f"Regular class size: {sys.getsizeof(regular)} bytes")
print(f"Slotted class size: {sys.getsizeof(slotted)} bytes")
# Significant savings with many instances
regular_objects = [RegularClass(i, i+1, i+2) for i in range(10000)]
slotted_objects = [SlottedClass(i, i+1, i+2) for i in range(10000)]
print(f"\nMemory for 10000 regular objects: ~{sys.getsizeof(regular) * 10000} bytes")
print(f"Memory for 10000 slotted objects: ~{sys.getsizeof(slotted) * 10000} bytes")
Pattern 14: Multiprocessing for CPU-Bound Tasks
import multiprocessing as mp
import time
def cpu_intensive_task(n):
"""CPU-intensive calculation."""
return sum(i**2 for i in range(n))
def sequential_processing():
"""Process tasks sequentially."""
start = time.time()
results = [cpu_intensive_task(1000000) for _ in range(4)]
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed, results
def parallel_processing():
"""Process tasks in parallel."""
start = time.time()
with mp.Pool(processes=4) as pool:
results = pool.map(cpu_intensive_task, [1000000] * 4)
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed, results
if __name__ == "__main__":
seq_time, seq_results = sequential_processing()
par_time, par_results = parallel_processing()
print(f"Sequential: {seq_time:.2f}s")
print(f"Parallel: {par_time:.2f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {seq_time/par_time:.2f}x")
Pattern 15: Async I/O for I/O-Bound Tasks
import asyncio
import aiohttp
import time
import requests
urls = [
"https://httpbin.org/delay/1",
"https://httpbin.org/delay/1",
"https://httpbin.org/delay/1",
"https://httpbin.org/delay/1",
]
def synchronous_requests():
"""Synchronous HTTP requests."""
start = time.time()
results = []
for url in urls:
response = requests.get(url)
results.append(response.status_code)
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed, results
async def async_fetch(session, url):
"""Async HTTP request."""
async with session.get(url) as response:
return response.status
async def asynchronous_requests():
"""Asynchronous HTTP requests."""
start = time.time()
async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
tasks = [async_fetch(session, url) for url in urls]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed, results
# Async is much faster for I/O-bound work
sync_time, sync_results = synchronous_requests()
async_time, async_results = asyncio.run(asynchronous_requests())
print(f"Synchronous: {sync_time:.2f}s")
print(f"Asynchronous: {async_time:.2f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {sync_time/async_time:.2f}x")
Database Optimization
Pattern 16: Batch Database Operations
import sqlite3
import time
def create_db():
"""Create test database."""
conn = sqlite3.connect(":memory:")
conn.execute("CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT)")
return conn
def slow_inserts(conn, count):
"""Insert records one at a time."""
start = time.time()
cursor = conn.cursor()
for i in range(count):
cursor.execute("INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES (?)", (f"User {i}",))
conn.commit() # Commit each insert
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed
def fast_inserts(conn, count):
"""Batch insert with single commit."""
start = time.time()
cursor = conn.cursor()
data = [(f"User {i}",) for i in range(count)]
cursor.executemany("INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES (?)", data)
conn.commit() # Single commit
elapsed = time.time() - start
return elapsed
# Benchmark
conn1 = create_db()
slow_time = slow_inserts(conn1, 1000)
conn2 = create_db()
fast_time = fast_inserts(conn2, 1000)
print(f"Individual inserts: {slow_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Batch insert: {fast_time:.4f}s")
print(f"Speedup: {slow_time/fast_time:.2f}x")
Pattern 17: Query Optimization
# Use indexes for frequently queried columns
"""
-- Slow: No index
SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'user@example.com';
-- Fast: With index
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email);
SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'user@example.com';
"""
# Use query planning
import sqlite3
conn = sqlite3.connect("example.db")
cursor = conn.cursor()
# Analyze query performance
cursor.execute("EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?", ("test@example.com",))
print(cursor.fetchall())
# Use SELECT only needed columns
# Slow: SELECT *
# Fast: SELECT id, name
Memory Optimization
Pattern 18: Detecting
…
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: GeniusHTX
- Source: GeniusHTX/SWE-Skills-Bench
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.