AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Work Unit Commits

skill-gentleman-programming-gentle-ai-work-unit-commits · by Gentleman-Programming

Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-gentleman-programming-gentle-ai-work-unit-commits

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-gentleman-programming-gentle-ai-work-unit-commits)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
18d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Work Unit Commits? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

When to Use

Load this skill when deciding what belongs in each commit or PR.

Use it for:

  • Splitting a feature into reviewable work.
  • Preparing commits before opening a PR.
  • Turning a large change into chained or stacked PRs.
  • Keeping reviewer cognitive load healthy.
  • Applying SDD tasks without accidentally producing a PR above 400 changed lines.

Critical Rules

| Rule | Requirement | |------|-------------| | Commit by work unit | A commit represents a deliverable behavior, fix, migration, or docs unit. | | Do not commit by file type | Avoid models, then services, then tests if none works alone. | | Keep tests with code | Tests belong in the same commit as the behavior they verify. | | Keep docs with the user-visible change | Docs belong with the feature or workflow they explain. | | Tell a story | A reviewer should understand why each commit exists from its diff and message. | | Future PR-ready | Each commit should be a candidate chained PR when the change grows. | | SDD workload guard | If SDD tasks forecast a >400-line change, group commits into chained PR slices before implementation. |

Work Unit Checklist

Before committing, confirm:

  • [ ] The commit has one clear purpose.
  • [ ] The repo still makes sense after applying only this commit.
  • [ ] Tests or docs for this unit are included when relevant.
  • [ ] Rollback is reasonable without reverting unrelated work.
  • [ ] Focused test command and exact result are recorded.
  • [ ] Runtime harness command/scenario and exact result are recorded, or explicit N/A explains why no runtime boundary exists.
  • [ ] Rollback boundary names the exact files/behavior removable without unrelated work.
  • [ ] The commit message explains the outcome, not the file list.

Split Examples

| Weak split | Better work-unit split | |------------|------------------------| | add models | feat(auth): add token validation domain model and tests | | add services | feat(auth): wire token validation into login flow | | add tests | Tests included with each behavior commit | | update docs | Docs included with the user-facing change they explain |

PR Relationship

Use work-unit commits as the foundation for chained PRs:

  1. Build the smallest independent work unit.
  2. Include verification for that unit.
  3. Commit it with a Conventional Commit message.
  4. If the PR approaches 400 changed lines, promote commits or groups of commits into chained PRs.

SDD Relationship

When sdd-tasks produces a Review Workload Forecast:

  • Low risk: keep work-unit commits inside one PR.
  • Medium risk: commit by work unit and monitor changed lines before PR creation.
  • High risk: follow SDD delivery_strategy — ask on ask-on-risk, auto-slice on auto-chain, require size:exception on over-budget single-pr, or record accepted size:exception on exception-ok.
  • Count authored additions plus deletions for the >400 threshold. Exclude generated goldens from that authored count, but include every generated file in complete snapshot identity and receipt validation.

Each SDD work unit should map cleanly to a commit or PR with:

  • clear start state,
  • clear finished state,
  • verification in the same unit,
  • rollback that does not remove unrelated work.

Its implementation evidence MUST include:

  • Focused test command and exact result.
  • Runtime harness command/scenario and exact result, or explicit N/A with reason.
  • Rollback boundary stated independently of commit creation; uncommitted work units still require it.
  • When fixing a bounded review ledger, group atomic work units inside the single correction transaction; work-unit count never creates another fix budget.

Commands

# Review the story before committing
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat

# Check recent commit style
git log --oneline -5

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.