AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Prompt Optimizer

skill-getsentry-skills-prompt-optimizer · by getsentry

Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.

No reviews yet
0 installs
63 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-getsentry-skills-prompt-optimizer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-getsentry-skills-prompt-optimizer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Prompt Optimizer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Prompt Optimizer

Optimize prompts with evals. Keep every instruction, example, and external context reference causal.

Load Only What You Need

| Need | Read | |------|------| | New prompt | references/core-patterns.md, references/model-family-notes.md, references/transformed-examples.md | | Existing prompt | references/meta-optimization-loop.md, references/core-patterns.md, references/model-family-notes.md | | Model-family port | references/model-family-notes.md, references/core-patterns.md | | Repeated failures | references/meta-optimization-loop.md, references/core-patterns.md | | Weak or ambiguous draft | references/transformed-examples.md | | Provenance | SOURCES.md |

Step 1: Capture Contract

Record before editing:

  • task type: new, refine, port, or debug
  • target model family and snapshot, if known
  • prompt surface: system, developer, user, tool descriptions, examples, schemas
  • layer owners: platform, deployer/persona, retrieved context, user payload
  • objective and non-goals
  • inputs, tools, and external files available
  • required output shape
  • success criteria and failure cases
  • hard constraints: latency, verbosity, safety, budget, tool use, style

If success criteria or examples are missing, create a small eval set first. If the bottleneck is model choice, retrieval, tool schema, or missing evals, say so before rewriting.

Step 2: Inventory External Context

For repo or agent prompts, list stable context by exact path:

| Context type | Examples | |--------------|----------| | Agent rules | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md | | Specs | specs/*.md, docs/api.md | | Policies | SECURITY.md, docs/releasing.md | | Examples | examples/, tests/fixtures/ |

Rules:

  • Reference stable files by repo-relative path instead of copying them.
  • Paste only excerpts needed for the prompt or eval case.
  • Mark whether a file is loaded, referenced, or out of scope.
  • Avoid vague context pointers such as "read the docs".

Step 3: Choose Model Strategy

Read references/model-family-notes.md.

  • Known family: optimize for that family.
  • Unknown family: write a portable base plus short adapter notes.
  • Snapshot changes: rerun evals.
  • Cross-family divergence: specialize only the failing layer.

Step 4: Shape Prompt

Read references/core-patterns.md.

  • Put stable policy in system or developer.
  • Put task-local facts, retrieved context, and variables in user-facing sections.
  • Keep one owner per behavior rule.
  • Use headings or tags only to separate content types.
  • Put tool policy in prompt text; keep schemas in provider-native tools.
  • Keep persona light unless it changes behavior.
  • Use the shortest wording that preserves the constraint.
  • Cut filler, repeated reminders, dead examples, and rationale that does not affect evals.

Step 5: Optimize

Read references/meta-optimization-loop.md for refinements.

  1. Baseline the current prompt on the same eval slice.
  2. Cluster failures by root cause.
  3. Write concrete edit criticisms.
  4. Generate two to four candidates:
  • minimal-diff repair
  • structure-first rewrite
  • examples-first or tool-rule variant
  • provider adapter when needed
  1. Compare candidates on the same cases.
  2. Keep a short optimization log.
  3. Validate the winner on holdout cases.
  4. Stop on plateau, oscillation, overfit, excessive cost, or non-prompt bottleneck.

Step 6: Return Package

Return:

  1. Target
  2. Success Criteria
  3. External Context
  4. Optimized Prompt
  5. Adapter Notes
  6. Eval Set
  7. Optimization Log
  8. Residual Risks

For existing prompts, include a concise diff-style note of the main behavioral changes.

Failure Modes

  • editing before defining the eval target
  • mixing policy, examples, and raw context without boundaries
  • duplicating rules across layers
  • putting durable policy in user payloads
  • asking for chain-of-thought
  • keeping contradictory legacy instructions
  • overfitting to one or two examples
  • retaining examples that no longer improve evals
  • fixing tool-use failures only in prompt text when tool descriptions or schemas are weak
  • adding markup that does not reduce ambiguity
  • using persona as a substitute for behavior rules

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.