AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Visual Design Loop

skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-visual-design-loop · by giang6283623

Run an iterative visual design improvement loop for UI/product polish tasks. Use when a request involves screenshots, rendering, visual review, frontend polish, layout/typography/color refinement, design QA, or a Claude/Codex loop goal that touches a visible product surface. Score the visual gate first and wait for user approval before starting loops.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-visual-design-loop

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-visual-design-loop)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
yesterday

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Visual Design Loop? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Visual Design Loop

Use this skill to improve a visible UI through controlled render-review-fix loops. Keep the brief and existing project conventions as the source of truth; do not add new product requirements just because a screen could be enhanced.

Gate

Do not start loops by default. Score the need first, 0-2 per question:

  1. Did the change alter a user-visible surface?
  2. Does the outcome depend on subjective visual judgment (layout, typography, color)?
  3. Could a visual regression reach end users unnoticed by existing tests?
  • Score 0-2: skip the loop; rely on the repo validation command.
  • Score 3-4: one screenshot check with at most one targeted fix; no loop.
  • Score 5-6: propose the loop with its budget and estimated cost, then wait for explicit user approval before the first loop.

Report the score and decision in one line, for example: "visual gate 5/6: proposing a 3-loop run, awaiting approval".

Contract

Before editing, resolve and state:

  • Goal.
  • Target surface: route, page, component, flow, or supplied screenshot.
  • Source of truth: current brief plus repo instructions, design system, nearby UI, and backbone.yml when present.
  • Render method: local URL, app command, Storybook story, preview command, static file, or supplied screenshot.
  • Screenshot method: browser screenshot, Playwright, in-app browser, provided image, or equivalent.
  • Editable paths.
  • Protected paths.
  • Budget: default 3 loops.
  • Timeout: default 10 minutes per loop.
  • Log path: /tmp/design-{project_slug}.md.

If render or screenshot capture is missing and cannot be inferred safely, ask for the missing command, URL, or image before editing.

Baseline

  1. Render the target surface.
  2. Capture or inspect the baseline screenshot.
  3. Review visible issues only; do not invent findings.
  4. Create or update /tmp/design-{project_slug}.md.
  5. Log the baseline screenshot, visual score, main issues, and any render constraints.

Derive project_slug from backbone.yml project.name when available; otherwise use the repository directory name.

Visual rubric

Score screenshots from 1 to 5 using:

  • Visual hierarchy: primary content and action are obvious.
  • Layout and spacing: alignment, rhythm, density, whitespace.
  • Typography: scale, contrast, readability, consistency.
  • Color and contrast: accessible, intentional, not noisy.
  • Component consistency: matches nearby UI and design system.
  • Responsiveness: works at relevant viewport sizes.
  • Interaction states: hover, focus, disabled, empty, loading, and error states when relevant.
  • Product fit: improves the brief without adding unnecessary features.

Loop

For each loop:

  1. Review the latest screenshot.
  2. Identify the highest-impact visual issue.
  3. Form one small hypothesis.
  4. Apply one targeted fix inside editable paths only.
  5. Render again.
  6. Capture the after screenshot.
  7. Compare before and after.
  8. Keep the change only if quality improves, or if quality is equal with simpler and safer implementation.
  9. Revert only your own loop changes if the result is worse.
  10. Run the repo validation command when code changed.
  11. Append the loop result to /tmp/design-{project_slug}.md.

Each loop entry must include:

  • Loop number.
  • Screenshot reviewed.
  • Issue found.
  • Hypothesis.
  • Fix applied.
  • Before/after judgment.
  • Rubric score before.
  • Rubric score after.
  • Validation result.
  • Remaining concerns.
  • Stop/continue decision.

Stop criteria

Stop when:

  • The design is polished enough for the brief.
  • The latest loop gives no meaningful improvement.
  • Further changes would be subjective or overworked.
  • Budget is reached.
  • Validation fails for a non-trivial reason.
  • A product or design decision is required from the user.
  • Render or screenshot tooling is unavailable.

Final report

Report:

  • Baseline score.
  • Final score.
  • Screenshots reviewed.
  • Changes kept.
  • Changes discarded, if any.
  • Validation result.
  • Remaining risks or design decisions.
  • Log path.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.