AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Wait What

skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-wait-what · by giang6283623

The last message did not land - stop and re-pitch it in plain language, in the user's language, until it lands.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-wait-what

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-giang6283623-minimal-vibe-coding-kit-wait-what)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
yesterday

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Wait What? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Wait What

The user is saying: comprehension failed. This is a repair of the listener's state, not a request for shorter text and not a request for new work. Re-pitch the previous message immediately. Text after the invocation names the part that lost the user; no text means re-pitch the whole previous message.

Rules for the re-pitch:

  • Diagnose first, silently: what failed is usually one of a missing premise, an undefined term, a skipped step, the wrong altitude (too abstract or too deep in detail), or a buried outcome. Repair that specific failure. An agent that hears "be brief" writes telegrams; an agent that hears "you lost me" backs up and explains.
  • Reply in the user's conversation language (English, Vietnamese, Chinese, or any other). Never switch to English to explain, and never mix registers mid-reply.
  • Plain-language register in every language: lead with the outcome, short sentences, one idea per sentence, active voice, concrete verbs, known information before new information, and define each necessary term at first use. Only when the reply language is English, also hold ASD-STE100-style simplicity: one meaning per word, no synonym rotation. The target is shorter and clearer, never shorter and blunter.
  • Use the project's own vocabulary: the glossary file named in backbone.yml project.context when present (in this kit: .vibekit/docs/CONTEXT.md). Without a glossary, use the exact names from backbone.yml and the code, and offer in one line to scaffold CONTEXT.md from .vibekit/docs/templates/CONTEXT_TEMPLATE.md. Never invent or localize project terms that the glossary does not define.
  • Quote code identifiers, commands, file paths, and error text verbatim in every language; never translate, paraphrase, or rename them.
  • Zero new work: same facts, same decisions, same state as the original message. No tool calls, no edits, no new conclusions. If re-explaining exposes an error in the original message, say so in one line and stop; the fix is a new task the user must ask for.
  • The register applies to this re-pitch, not to the rest of the session; standing style comes from the project's writing rules.
  • End with one short line naming the part most likely still unclear, so the user can aim the next "wait" precisely.

Done when: the re-pitch restores the missing premise in the user's language, is shorter and clearer than the original, and every project term comes from the glossary or the code, not invention.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.