Install
$ agentstack add skill-gokulb20-crewm8-social-media-manager-skill-graph-news-response ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
News Response
Scan for industry news and write fast, thoughtful responses that position the brand as plugged-in and opinionated. Speed wins on news — the first insightful take gets disproportionate engagement. Being the 4th person to comment on a story means you're invisible.
Purpose
News commentary is the highest-leverage content type for building authority. It proves you're paying attention, have opinions, and can contextualize industry events. But only if you're fast and add genuine insight.
When to Use
- Major industry announcement (funding, acquisition, product launch, regulation)
- Competitor launched something significant
- Technology breakthrough or trend report
- Founder says "we should weigh in"
Inputs Required
- News item (URL, headline, or summary)
- Brand positioning (so the take is on-brand)
- Whether founder approval is needed for this specific topic
Quick Reference
| News Type | Response Target | Format | Tone | |----------|----------------|--------|------| | Major industry news | Within 1 hour | Short post + optional follow-up thread | Insightful, fast analysis | | Competitor announcement | Within 2-3 hours | Respectful commentary | Professional, differentiated | | Data/trend report | Within 4-6 hours | Thread or LinkedIn post | Analytical, helpful framing | | Founder/figure controversy | Assess carefully — sometimes silence | If engaging: calm, principled stance | Measured, values-driven |
Procedure
- Monitor news channels:
- X lists of industry journalists and analysts
- Google News alerts for key terms
- Niche newsletters and SubStacks
- Competitor social accounts
- When news breaks, assess:
- Relevant to brand audience?
- Can brand add unique perspective?
- Time-sensitive window?
- Is silence smarter? (controversy, tragedy, legal)
- Draft the response:
- Acknowledge the news (1 line — assume audience hasn't seen it)
- Add brand's unique take (what does this MEAN for the audience?)
- Provide context the headline missed (this is where you add value)
- Frame implications: why this matters, what to watch
- Choose format:
- X: fast short post or quote tweet of news source
- LinkedIn: longer analysis post
- Not typically breaking news for IG/TikTok (unless visual-first angle)
- Quality control:
- Fact check: confirmed or rumor?
- Attribution: link to original source
- Brand fit: makes brand look smart or opportunistic?
Output Format
# News Response: [Headline]
## Source
**News break:** [Timestamp]
**Source:** [URL or @handle]
**Summary:** [What happened]
## Assessment
**Relevance to audience:** [High / Medium / Low]
**Unique angle:** [Yes / No — what]
**First-mover window:** [Hours remaining]
**Risk level:** [Low / Medium / High]
## Response Draft
**Platform:** [X / LinkedIn]
[Full post text]
**Format:** [Short post / Thread / Quote tweet]
**Tone:** [Insightful / Analytical / Measured / Critical]
**CTA:** [What action to drive]
Done Criteria
The skill is complete when:
- News is verified (not rumor)
- Response draft includes a unique take (not just "here's the news")
- Format is matched to news type and platform
- Link attribution to source is included
- Content angle approved for sensitivity (if applicable)
Pitfalls
- Responding without a genuine take ("This is big" — no insight)
- Taking a stance without founder approval
- Getting facts wrong because speed > accuracy
- Quoting competitor news in a way that promotes them
- Being the 14th person with the same take
Verification
Before posting: is this take something only this brand could say? Is it more insightful than the top 3 existing responses? If not, refine or don't post.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gokulb20
- Source: gokulb20/Crewm8-Social-Media-Manager-Skill-Graph
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://crewm8.ai
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.