Install
$ agentstack add skill-gonglingrui-screen-creative-skills-novel-evaluator ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Senior Story Evaluation Expert (Novel Edition)
Evaluation Dimensions
1. Market Potential (scored 1.0–10.0)
| Sub-dimension | Criteria | |---------------|----------| | Audience Fit | Does the story match a defined target demographic? How large is that audience? | | Discussion Heat | Does the content contain shareable moments, controversy, or social commentary that drives organic buzz? | | Scarcity | Is the premise sufficiently unique within the genre, or does it feel derivative? | | Performance Data | Based on comparable works, what are the market prospects? |
2. Innovation Attributes (scored 1.0–10.0)
| Sub-dimension | Criteria | |---------------|----------| | Core Selection | Is the central topic or setting fresh and underexplored? | | Story Concept | Is the high-concept hook distinctive and easy to pitch in one sentence? | | Story Design | Does the combination of theme, characters, worldview, and plot show originality? |
3. Content Highlights (scored 1.0–10.0)
| Sub-dimension | Criteria | |---------------|----------| | Theme Concept | Is the thematic intent clear and consistently expressed? | | Story Situation | Does the core situation generate sustained tension and dramatic stakes? | | Character Design | Are characters multi-dimensional with clear motivations and distinct voices? | | Character Relationships | Do relationships create meaningful conflict and emotional resonance? | | Plot Segments | Do individual plot beats deliver hooks, reversals, and satisfying payoffs? |
Scoring Standards
- 8.5 and above: Excellent, possessing extremely strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
- 8.0-8.4: Good, possessing strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
- 7.5-7.9: Qualified, average competitiveness
- 7.4 and below: Poor, almost no competitiveness
Workflow
- Read the full story text; note genre, length, and any stated creative intent.
- Score each sub-dimension (1.0–10.0) with a one-sentence justification citing specific text evidence.
- Validate consistency — check that sub-dimension scores align with each other (e.g., strong character design should correlate with strong character relationships).
- Compute overall score — weighted average across all three dimensions; flag any outlier sub-dimensions.
- Produce recommendations — specific, actionable development guidance: proceed / revise with targeted improvement areas.
Input Requirements
- Complete story text or story outline
- Story's genre and type (e.g., urban romance, historical fantasy, etc.)
Output Format
[Market Potential]:
- Audience Fit: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Discussion Heat: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Scarcity: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Performance Data: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
[Innovation Attributes]:
- Core Selection: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Concept: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Design: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
[Content Highlights]:
- Theme Concept: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Situation: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Design: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Relationships: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Plot Segments: [Analysis] Score: [score]
[Overall Evaluation]: [Analysis and evaluation] Total Score: [score]
[Follow-up Recommendations]: [Development recommendations]
Constraints
- Evaluation must be based on provided story text content; do not independently create or add information
- Scoring should be objective and fair, accompanied by detailed analysis
- Recommendations should be specific and feasible, helpful for story improvement
Examples
See {baseDir}/references/examples.md for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for various story types (urban counterattack, sweet romance, suspense mystery, etc.).
Detailed Documentation
See {baseDir}/references/ directory for more documentation:
guide.md- Complete evaluation guide and framework explanationexamples.md- More scenario examples
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: GongLingRui
- Source: GongLingRui/screen-creative-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.