Install
$ agentstack add skill-goodeye-labs-truesight-mcp-skills-review-and-promote-traces ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Review and Promote Traces
Use this skill for the judgment and promotion loop after trace evaluation.
Interactive Q&A protocol (mandatory)
BEFORE the first scoping question, search for a structured question tool (e.g., AskUserQuestion or similar interactive widget) and load it. Use that tool for EVERY scoping question. Fall back to plain-text lettered options ONLY if no such tool exists in the environment.
If context is unclear, ask one question at a time using the structured question tool (loaded per the HARD-GATE above).
Example question structure:
What do you want to review first?
A) One specific run
B) Pending queue triage across runs
Rules:
- Ask one question per message.
- Use the structured question tool for every question. Structure each with a short header, 2-4 options with labels and descriptions, and place the recommended option first. Do not add "(Recommended)" or similar annotations to option labels.
- Ask one follow-up when needed, then continue.
Workflow
- If needed, flag evaluated run:
- Use
flag_review_itemwithrun_id.
- Retrieve review items:
- Use
list_review_itemswith pagination.
- Collect human judgments:
- Present review items to the user and ask for judgment one item at a time when needed.
- Capture
judgment_valueand optionalnotesfor each item. - Use the structured question tool (loaded per the HARD-GATE above) to present options that match the live evaluation setup:
- Binary example:
- A) Pass
- B) Fail
- Categorical example:
- A)
- B)
- C)
- Continuous example:
- A) Enter numeric value (within configured range)
- B) Skip this item for now
- If valid options are unclear, look them up before asking:
1) Inspect list_review_items payload for item result details and expected value hints. 2) Use get_result(run_id) for run-level context and chain outputs. 3) If evaluation id is available in run metadata, call get_evaluation(evaluation_id) and read config/judgment criteria to derive valid judgment options.
- When options remain ambiguous after lookup, ask one clarification question using the structured question tool before proceeding.
- Submit judgments:
- For each target item, call
judge_review_item. - Pass the user-provided
judgment_valueand optionalnotesintojudge_review_item. - Include notes when judgment context matters.
- Promote judged outputs:
- Use
add_reviewed_items_to_datasetwithrun_id.
- Report result:
- number of items judged
- promotion status and row counts
- any skipped or blocked items
Queue-wide triage guidance
- Group by run and status first.
- Prioritize high-impact runs or oldest pending runs.
- Keep an audit trail of judgment rationale in notes.
Scopes reference
list_review_itemsrequiresreview:readflag_review_item,judge_review_item, andadd_reviewed_items_to_datasetrequirereview:write
If a scope error occurs, ask the user to create a key with the missing scope in Truesight Settings.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Goodeye-Labs
- Source: Goodeye-Labs/truesight-mcp-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://truesight.goodeyelabs.com/docs/mcp-integration
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.