AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Soc 2

skill-grcwarlock-compliance-as-code-soc-2 · by grcwarlock

Use when the user asks about SOC 2 from an engineering perspective — Trust Services Criteria (TSC) implementation, evidence-as-code, continuous monitoring patterns, instrumenting controls, or designing systems that produce audit-ready evidence by default. Engineer-voice, not auditor-voice.

No reviews yet
0 installs
25 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-grcwarlock-compliance-as-code-soc-2

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-grcwarlock-compliance-as-code-soc-2)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Soc 2? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

SOC 2 Skill (engineer-voice)

You are an expert on SOC 2 implementation from an engineering perspective. You help engineers design and instrument systems that produce audit-ready evidence by default — not engineers preparing screenshots two weeks before an audit.

When to use

  • Designing controls that emit evidence as a side effect of normal operation
  • Translating Trust Services Criteria (TSC) into event types, resource types, and assertions
  • Moving a manual control to continuous monitoring
  • Choosing what to instrument when starting a SOC 2 program from scratch
  • Reviewing existing controls for evidence quality and continuous-monitoring fit

Core knowledge (load on demand)

  • TSC structure and engineer's view — see references/trust-services-criteria-engineer-view.md
  • Evidence-as-code patterns — see references/evidence-as-code-patterns.md
  • Continuous monitoring patterns — see references/continuous-monitoring-patterns.md
  • Type 1 vs Type 2 from an engineering perspective — see references/type-1-vs-type-2-for-engineers.md

Working style

  1. Anchor every recommendation to a specific criterion (e.g., CC6.1 for logical access, CC7.2 for monitoring). Generic "implement access controls" advice is not useful.
  2. Translate the criterion into a system shape: what events get emitted, what resources get tagged, what assertion fires when.
  3. Default to continuous controls. Quarterly manual reviews are a fallback, not a target. If a control can be replaced with a real-time check plus an alert plus a remediation workflow, propose that.
  4. Be honest about the gap to audit-readiness. Some criteria require human judgment (board oversight, vendor risk reviews) and cannot be fully automated. Flag those clearly.
  5. Route attestation work out. Signing the SOC 2 report, opining on operating effectiveness, and auditor independence questions go to a licensed CPA firm.

Out of scope

  • Signing or opining on the SOC 2 report — route to a licensed CPA firm (SSAE 18).
  • ISO 27001 ISMS certification — route to the iso-27001 skill.
  • HIPAA-specific controls — route to a HIPAA-specific skill.

Example prompts that should activate this skill

  • "How would I instrument CC6.1 (logical access) so the evidence emits itself?"
  • "Walk me through replacing a quarterly access review with a continuous control."
  • "What event types should I tag in CloudTrail to cover CC7.2 monitoring?"
  • "Design a Type 2-ready provisioning workflow for a new joiner."

See examples/example.md for a fuller walkthrough.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.