AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Swarm Review

skill-grimoire-rs-grimoire-swarm-review · by grimoire-rs

Use for branch, PR, or diff review before landing on main. Tier (`low | auto | high | max`) scales breadth from single reviewer to adversarial panel with architect + SOTA-gap + Codex cross-model gate. Triggers: "review", "/swarm-review", pre-merge checks.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-grimoire-rs-grimoire-swarm-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-grimoire-rs-grimoire-swarm-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Swarm Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Adversarial Reviewer — Tiered

Thin dispatch layer. Phase plans live in sibling tier files (tier-low.md, tier-high.md, tier-max.md). This file parse args, resolve baseline, classify diff (classify.md), resolve overlays (overlays.md), optionally gate on meta-plan approval, then hand off to matching tier file. Shared content (worker table, adversarial protocol, output format, constraints) stay here — perspective-by- perspective execution lives in tier files.

Argument syntax

/swarm-review [tier]  [--flags]
  • tier (optional): low | auto | high | max. Default auto.
  • target (optional): branch name; PR ref (` / #` /

PR / pull/ / full GitHub PR URL); empty → current branch HEAD.

  • flags (Grimoire convention: flags before positional):
  • --base= — diff baseline; default main. When target

resolves to PR, inferred from gh pr view --json baseRefName unless user pass --base explicit.

  • --breadth=minimal|full|adversarial — Stage 2 perspective breadth
  • --reviewer=haiku|sonnet|opus — model for worker-reviewer
  • --doc-reviewer=haiku|sonnet — model for worker-doc-reviewer
  • --rca=on|off — Five Whys systemic-fix analysis
  • --codex / --no-codex — cross-model adversarial pass (code-diff scope)
  • --codex-model=luna|terra|sol — Codex model for cross-model pass

(default per tier: high=terra, max=sol; luna if forced at low)

  • --dry-run — meta-plan preview via EnterPlanMode
  • --form — structured AskUserQuestion form; implies --dry-run

--base is pipeline input, not axis. Feeds classifier as diff baseline for whole run. Overlays (breadth, rca, codex) are single-axis pipeline adjustments on top of chosen tier.

Workflow

1. Parse arguments and resolve target

Detect target (ordered, first match wins):

  1. Full GitHub PR URL
  2. PR / pull/ → PR
  3. # or bare integer → probe PR via mcp__github__pull_request_read
  4. Branch name — verify via git rev-parse --verify
  5. Empty → current branch HEAD

PR metadata (labels, base ref, title, body) feeds both baseline resolution and classifier. On fetch fail, fall back to free-text treatment (match /swarm-plan convention).

2. Resolve the baseline

  • User pass --base= → use verbatim (user wins).
  • Else target is PR → use gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName.
  • Else default main.

Fast-fail when git rev-parse --verify fails — print remediation (did you mean origin/main?) and stop. Empty diff → report "nothing to review" and exit clean.

3. Classify (only when tier=auto)

Read classify.md. Compute diff metrics once (git diff ...HEAD --name-only for files, --shortstat for lines). Apply tier signals (size + subsystems + structural markers + PR labels). Produce candidate tier + confidence flag + overlay set. When signals split across adjacent tiers, mark low-confidence — meta-plan gate in step 5 resolve it. No mid-flow AskUserQuestion.

4. Resolve overlays

Final config = tier defaults (overlays.md per-tier table) + classifier overlays + user flag overrides. User flags always win.

5. Meta-plan gate (single consolidated approval point)

Fire when ANY of: --dry-run, --form, tier resolved to max, or low-confidence classification. Only user-prompt point.

Write .claude/state/plans/meta-plan_review_[target].md with: Classification (tier + rationale + diff metrics snapshot), Baseline (source: user-flag / PR-base / default), Overlays (with rationale), Workers per perspective, Estimated cost, Not Doing (no auto-fixes, no commits).

Approval UI (always single interaction):

  • Default: EnterPlanMode with meta-plan path; resume on approve.

Fall back to AskUserQuestion Approve/Edit/Cancel if skill resume after ExitPlanMode unreliable in practice.

  • --form: ONE AskUserQuestion call with ≤4 batched axis questions

(Tier / Breadth / RCA / Codex), first option "Recommended".

On reject: re-draft with rejection rationale and re-present once.

6. Announce final config (always)

Swarm review
  Tier:       high                             (auto — 8 files, 240 lines, 1 subsystem)
  Baseline:   main                             (default)
  Target:     HEAD (branch: soraka)
  Overlays:   breadth=full, rca=on, codex=off  (tier default)
  Workers:    Stage 1 (2 parallel), Stage 2 (4 parallel)
  Codex diff review: off
  Proceed? (Ctrl+C to abort; re-run with explicit tier to override)

7. Dispatch to tier file

Read matching tier-{low,high,max}.md and execute its phase plan.

Worker assignment (shared across tiers)

See .claude/rules/workflow-swarm.md for worker types, models, tools, focus modes. Tier files select subset of these perspectives.

| Perspective | Worker / focus | Tier use | |---|---|---| | Spec-compliance | worker-reviewer (spec-compliance, phase: post-implementation) | all | | Compatibility (breaking-change gate) | worker-reviewer (compatibility) | all — dedicated Stage 1 reviewer at high/max; anchor set folded into the single reviewer at low | | Test coverage | worker-reviewer (quality, lens: test-coverage) | high, max | | Quality | worker-reviewer (quality) | all | | Security | worker-reviewer (security) | high (security paths), max | | Performance | worker-reviewer (performance) | high (hot paths), max | | Architecture | worker-architect | max (+ adversarial) | | Documentation | worker-doc-reviewer | high, max | | CLI UX | worker-reviewer (quality, lens: cli-ux) | max (+ adversarial) | | SOTA | worker-researcher | max (+ adversarial) | | Cross-model | codex-adversary (code-diff) | high (when --codex fires), max (mandatory) |

Max concurrent workers: 8 (per workflow-swarm.md).

Adversarial protocol & output format

Adversarial questioning anchors ("What if this assumption is wrong?", "Under what conditions would this fail?", "What edge cases weren't considered?") apply at every tier. Root-cause Five-Whys analysis is tier-gated via rca axis (see overlays.md).

Output skeleton — tier files add or remove Stage 2 sections per breadth they run. Every tier produces:

## Code Review: [target]
### Summary
- Verdict: Approved | Needs Work | Request Changes
- Tier / Baseline / Diff: N files, +L / -L lines, S subsystems
### Stage 1 — Correctness (spec-compliance, test-coverage)
### Stage 2 — [perspectives run at this tier]
### Cross-Model Adversarial (Codex)  # if --codex fired
### Root-Cause Analysis               # if rca=on
### Deferred Findings (human judgment required)

Verdict: Approve (Block/High resolved or deferred with reasoning), Needs Work (Warn-tier present), Request Changes (unresolved Block-tier / security / any breaking change — prohibited during the 1.0.0 stabilization freeze / missing tests / arch violations).

Constraints

  • NO auto-fixing — review read-only; actionable findings reported, not committed
  • NO approving with unresolved Block-tier findings
  • NO nitpicking style when using rustfmt
  • NO mid-flow AskUserQuestion during classification
  • NO exceeding 8 parallel workers
  • ALWAYS reference specific files and lines
  • ALWAYS suggest alternatives, not just problems
  • ALWAYS classify every finding as actionable or deferred
  • ALWAYS stay within diff scope (...HEAD)

Plan Status block (mutate on round entry + verdict)

Mutate the plan's ## Status block: flip Step to /swarm-review → round N on each round entry; on verdict, set awaiting /finalize (Approve) or awaiting /swarm-execute (review-fix loop) (Needs Work / Request Changes); bump Last update. Skip silently when no current_plan.md / no Status block. Full mutation table → [meta-ai-config.md](../../rules/meta-ai-config.md) "Plan Status Protocol".

Handoff

  • To /swarm-execute: when actionable findings exist and user

want them fixed. /swarm-execute runs Review-Fix Loop.

  • To /builder: with remediation task list for specific finding.
  • To /doc-writer: with gap report from worker-doc-reviewer.
  • To /architect: for architectural concerns requiring ADR.

$ARGUMENTS

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.