AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Flag Review

skill-growthbook-skills-flag-review · by growthbook

Request or submit an approval review on a GrowthBook feature flag draft revision. Use when the user says "request review for this draft", "approve this change", "reject this draft", "request changes on revision X", "I want to review flag Y's pending draft", "submit my approval", "mark this as needing changes", "who needs to approve this", or "check the review status". For creating and editing dra…

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-growthbook-skills-flag-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets Used
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-growthbook-skills-flag-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Flag Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

flag-review

Request and submit approval reviews on GrowthBook feature flag draft revisions. Only needed when the org has approval workflows configured — if approvals aren't required, flag-publish handles the full flow without a review step.

Two roles use this skill: the drafter (requests a review, can't self-approve) and the reviewer (submits the review decision).

All API calls go through the bundled helper: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gb-call. It needs GB_API_KEY set in env or written to ~/.config/growthbook/.env by /growthbook:setup.

Approval flow

draft → [request-review] → pending-review → [approve]           → approved → [publish]
                                           → [request-changes]  → changes-requested → [edit + re-request] → pending-review
                                           → [comment]          → pending-review (status unchanged)

Workflow

Path A — Request review (drafter asking for approval)

  1. Resolve the revision. If the user gave a version number, use it. Otherwise try /latest (happy path when one draft exists), then fall back to listing if needed:

``bash gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/latest # or if version is known: gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/ ` Accept draft or changes-requested` status. For any other status, surface it and explain what it means using the status table from flag-revisions.

  1. Request review:

``bash echo '{"comment":""}' \ | gb-call POST /api/v2/features//revisions//request-review - ``

Revision moves to pending-review. Tell the user a reviewer needs to approve before it can be published via flag-publish. Remind them that self-approval is not allowed — a different team member must review.

Path B — Submit a review (reviewer acting on a pending-review revision)

  1. Identify the revision. A version number alone is not enough — you always need the flag ID too (version numbers are per-flag counters, not globally unique). Collect whichever of these the user has, then query accordingly:

Flag ID + version known → fetch directly: ``bash gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/ ``

Flag ID known, version unknown → list pending-review on that flag: ``bash gb-call GET '/api/v2/features//revisions?status=pending-review' ``

Author email or userId known → filter cross-feature by author: ``bash gb-call GET '/api/v2/flag-revisions?status=pending-review&author=' ``

Author name known but not email → fetch all pending-review revisions and filter client-side on createdBy matching the name: ``bash gb-call GET '/api/v2/flag-revisions?status=pending-review' ` Each revision has a createdBy field (display name or "API"). Filter for entries where createdBy` contains the name the user gave, then confirm with the user before proceeding.

Nothing known → same broad query, show all results and ask the user to identify theirs.

  1. For anything non-trivial, offer to open the GrowthBook UI first — the side-by-side diff and approval controls are clearer than text:

``bash # macOS: open /features/?v= # Linux: xdg-open /features/?v= ` Derive from GBAPIURL by replacing api.app.`. If the reviewer prefers to work in the UI, stop here.

For API-based review, fetch both the revision and the live feature to show a proper before/after diff: ``bash gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/ # draft state gb-call GET /api/v2/features/ # current live state `` Surface: which rules changed (added/edited/removed), defaultValue change, metadata changes, env toggle changes, prerequisites changes — comparing draft fields against the live feature.

  1. Ask the reviewer which action they want:
  • approve — changes look good, ready to publish
  • request-changes — issues found, author needs to update
  • comment — feedback only, no status change
  1. Submit the review:

``bash echo '{"action":"approve","comment":""}' \ | gb-call POST /api/v2/features//revisions//submit-review - ``

Status transitions:

  • approveapproved — tell user to publish via flag-publish
  • request-changeschanges-requested — tell reviewer what happens next (author edits, re-requests)
  • commentpending-review unchanged — comment is recorded

Path C — Check review status

If version isn't known, try /latest first:

gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/latest
# or with a known version:
gb-call GET /api/v2/features//revisions/

Report status and what needs to happen next:

| Status | Next step | | --- | --- | | draft | Author requests review when ready | | pending-review | Reviewer submits a decision | | approved | Author publishes via flag-publish | | changes-requested | Author edits draft, then re-requests review |

Guardrails

  • Self-approval is blocked server-side. The API rejects a review submitted by the draft's own author. If the user mentions they created the draft, halt before calling submit-review: "You created this draft — a different team member must approve it." Otherwise let the server enforce it and surface the error if it fires.
  • Can only request-review on draft or changes-requested status. Surface the actual status if the user tries on anything else.
  • Can only submit-review on pending-review status. Surface the actual status if it doesn't match.
  • changes-requested is not discarded. The draft still exists; the author edits it and re-requests review via Path A. Don't suggest discarding unless the author explicitly wants to abandon the changes.
  • Reset-review-on-changes. If the org has this setting enabled, any edit to an approved draft reverts it to draft. Warn the user if they're about to edit an already-approved revision: "Editing this revision will reset its approval status — you'll need to request review again."
  • Approval ≠ publication. An approved draft is not yet live. The author still needs to run flag-publish.
  • This skill does not publish. After approval, hand off to flag-publish.

Endpoints used

  • GET /api/v2/features/:id/revisions/:version — inspect revision before acting
  • GET /api/v2/features/:id/revisions (status filter) — find pending-review revisions for a flag
  • GET /api/v2/flag-revisions (status, mine filters) — find pending-review revisions across all flags
  • POST /api/v2/features/:id/revisions/:version/request-review (body: optional comment)
  • POST /api/v2/features/:id/revisions/:version/submit-review (body: action + optional comment)

Handoffs

  • flag-revisions — to list and inspect all open drafts
  • flag-publish — after approval, to publish the draft live

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.