Install
$ agentstack add skill-growthenginenowoslawski-coldoutboundskills-deliverability-test-public ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Deliverability Test — Inbox Type Comparison
Compare reply rates, bounce rates, and positive reply rates broken down by inbox type (SMTP, Gmail / G Suite, Outlook / Office365) across your Smartlead account. Use it to answer "are my Gmail inboxes performing better than my SMTP ones?" or "why is one inbox type bouncing more than the others?"
Why this exists
Different inbox types have different deliverability characteristics:
- Gmail / G Suite — highest trust, fewest bounces, often best reply rates
- Office365 — good reputation, but stricter spam filtering
- SMTP (Zapmail, Maildoso, Mailforge, custom) — varies wildly by provider, often has higher bounces in the first 30 days of domain life
If your campaigns mix inbox types, this skill shows which type is earning its keep.
What you need
SMARTLEAD_API_KEYin env- Optional:
--client-id=for sub-clients - Optional:
--days=lookback (default 7)
Steps
# Full account, last 7 days
npx tsx scripts/inbox-type-compare.ts
# Specific sub-client, 14-day lookback
npx tsx scripts/inbox-type-compare.ts --client-id=5560 --days=14
# Just show today
npx tsx scripts/inbox-type-compare.ts --days=1
Output
Inbox Type Comparison — last 7 days
Type Inboxes Sent Replies Bounces Reply % Bounce %
--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
G Suite 12 3,120 42 12 1.35% 0.38%
Office365 24 6,440 65 28 1.01% 0.43%
SMTP 44 10,780 55 98 0.51% 0.91%
--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
TOTAL 80 20,340 162 138 0.80% 0.68%
Takeaways:
- G Suite has the highest reply rate (1.35%) and lowest bounce rate.
- SMTP reply rate is 60% lower than G Suite — investigate domain reputation.
- SMTP bounce rate is 2x average — run /email-deliverability-audit on SMTP domains.
How it works
- Pulls all email accounts via
/email-accountsAPI paginated - Groups by
typefield (GMAIL, OUTLOOK, SMTP, etc.) - For each campaign that uses these inboxes, pulls per-inbox stats from
/campaigns/{id}/analyticsand/campaigns/{id}/sequence-analytics-by-email-account - Aggregates sent/replies/bounces within each type group
- Prints formatted table
Common gotchas
- Reply rate here is RAW, not positive. For positive reply rate (the more important metric), use
/positive-reply-scoring. - Small inbox counts are noisy. If you only have 2 Gmail inboxes and 40 SMTP ones, the Gmail numbers aren't statistically meaningful.
- Inbox type labels can be surprising. Some providers register as "SMTP" even when they're technically Gmail-proxied. Trust the label Smartlead gave them.
What to do next
If one inbox type is underperforming: /smartlead-inbox-manager to retire the bad ones (tag retired, disable warmup). If replacements are needed, /zapmail-domain-setup-public to provision new domains on a different provider type.
If all types are healthy: back to the weekly rhythm via /cold-email-weekly-rhythm.
Or wait: small sample sizes (<500 sends per type) are noisy. If your results are inconclusive, run again in 7 days with more data.
Related skills
/email-deliverability-audit— full audit (SPF/DKIM/DMARC + reputation + spam placement)/positive-reply-scoring— the metric that matters, not just reply rate/smartlead-inbox-manager— rotate out bad inboxes, tag by performance
Scripts
scripts/inbox-type-compare.ts— pulls + compares per-type rates
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: growthenginenowoslawski
- Source: growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.