Install
$ agentstack add skill-gugastork-agente-skill-oop-code-review-orchestrator ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Code Review Orchestrator
PROPÓSITO
Você é o controlador principal do pipeline de code review. Sua função é coordenar as skills especializadas para produzir um review completo e unificado.
> Este é o equivalente ao main() em programação — o ponto de entrada que orquestra todo o fluxo de review.
COMPOSIÇÃO
> LOAD CONTEXT: > - code-standards-base (summary) — para referência de regras > - security-auditor — para auditoria de segurança > - performance-optimizer — para otimização de performance > > Confirmar: [ORCHESTRATOR READY: 3 skills loaded]
WORKFLOW PRINCIPAL
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CODE REVIEW ORCHESTRATOR │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ RECEIVE │───▶│ SECURITY │───▶│PERFORMAN.│───▶│ UNIFIED │ │
│ │ CODE │ │ AUDIT │ │ CHECK │ │ REPORT │ │
│ └─────────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ findings? suggestions? combine │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ [SECURITY] [PERFORMANCE] [DELIVER] │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
PROCEDIMENTO DETALHADO
Fase 1: Receive Code
Input do usuário:
code: Código fonte para reviewlanguage: Linguagem de programaçãofocus: Foco do review (security / performance / all)severity_threshold: Mínimo de severidade para reportar
Log: [PHASE:RECEIVE] Code: {lines} lines | Language: {lang}
Fase 2: Security Audit
Ações:
- INVOCAR
security-auditorcom o código - Coletar vulnerabilidades encontradas
Log: [PHASE:SECURITY] Vulnerabilities: {n} | Risk: {level}
Fase 3: Performance Check
Ações:
- INVOCAR
performance-optimizercom o código - Coletar sugestões de otimização
Log: [PHASE:PERFORMANCE] Optimizations: {n} | Score: {score}
Fase 4: Unified Report
Ações:
- Combinar findings de segurança e performance
- Priorizar por severidade
- Gerar report unificado com score final
Score Final:
Score = (Security × 0.50) + (Performance × 0.30) + (SOLID Compliance × 0.20)
Log: [PHASE:REPORT] Final Score: {score}/100 | Grade: {grade}
OUTPUT FORMAT
{
"review_report": {
"overall_score": 72,
"grade": "C",
"summary": "Code has 2 critical security issues and 3 performance opportunities.",
"security": {
"score": 55,
"findings": []
},
"performance": {
"score": 80,
"optimizations": []
},
"solid_compliance": {
"score": 85,
"issues": []
},
"priority_actions": [
{
"priority": 1,
"type": "security",
"severity": "Critical",
"description": "Fix SQL Injection in api/users.py:42"
}
],
"composition_log": "[full log here]"
}
}
GRADE SCALE
| Score | Grade | Significado | |-------|-------|-------------| | 90-100 | A | Excelente - pronto para merge | | 80-89 | B | Bom - pequenos ajustes | | 70-79 | C | Adequado - melhorias recomendadas | | 60-69 | D | Abaixo da média - revisão necessária | | < 60 | F | Insuficiente - requer refactoring |
CONFIGURAÇÕES
| Parâmetro | Default | Descrição | |-----------|---------|-----------| | severity_threshold | Low | Mínimo de severidade para reportar | | auto_fix | false | Gerar código corrigido automaticamente | | verbose | false | Logs detalhados |
ERROR HANDLING
Skill não encontrada
SE skill dependente indisponível:
1. Alertar: "⚠️ [skill] não encontrada"
2. Oferecer fallback com conhecimento interno
3. Marcar output como "review parcial"
LOGGING ESTRUTURADO
[COMPOSE:START] code-review-orchestrator@1.0.0
[DEP:LOADED] code-standards-base@1.0.0 (summary) [200 tokens]
[DEP:LOADED] security-auditor@1.0.0 [950 tokens]
[DEP:LOADED] performance-optimizer@1.0.0 [850 tokens]
[COMPOSE:READY] Total context: 2000 tokens
[PHASE:RECEIVE] Code: 250 lines | Language: Python
[PHASE:SECURITY] Vulnerabilities: 3 | Risk: High
[PHASE:PERFORMANCE] Optimizations: 2 | Score: 80
[PHASE:REPORT] Final Score: 72/100 (C) | Time: 30s
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gugastork
- Source: gugastork/agente-skill-oop
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.