AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Planning And Task Breakdown

skill-guillemroca-agent-skills-android-planning-and-task-breakdown · by GuillemRoca

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
5 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-guillemroca-agent-skills-android-planning-and-task-breakdown

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Planning And Task Breakdown? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Planning and Task Breakdown

Overview

"The plan is the task — 10 minutes upfront prevents hours of rework." Break work into small, ordered, verifiable tasks before writing code. Each task is a vertical slice that leaves the system in a working state.

When to Use

  • Before implementing any feature spanning more than 2–3 files
  • After writing a spec (follows spec-driven-development)
  • When a task feels "too big to start"
  • When multiple developers will work on related code

Skip when: The change is a single-file fix with obvious scope.

Core Process

Step 1: Read-Only Analysis

  1. Read the spec (SPEC.md) or requirements — do not modify any code
  2. Map the codebase:
  • Which modules are involved? (:app, :feature:*, :core:*)
  • Which layers? (UI → ViewModel → UseCase → Repository → DataSource)
  • What existing code can be reused?
  1. Identify constraints:
  • Android API level requirements
  • Existing architecture patterns to follow
  • Library versions and compatibility

Step 2: Map Dependencies

  1. Draw the dependency graph:
  • Data models → Repository → UseCase → ViewModel → UI
  • Room entities → DAOs → Database migrations
  • Navigation graph changes → Screen composables → ViewModels
  1. Identify the critical path — what must exist before other work can start

Step 3: Vertical Slicing

  1. Slice vertically, not horizontally:

Wrong (horizontal):

  • Task 1: Create all Room entities
  • Task 2: Create all DAOs
  • Task 3: Create all repositories
  • Task 4: Create all ViewModels
  • Task 5: Create all screens

Right (vertical):

  • Task 1: User can view item list (Entity + DAO + Repo + ViewModel + Screen)
  • Task 2: User can create new item (AddScreen + ViewModel + Repo insert)
  • Task 3: User can edit existing item (EditScreen + ViewModel + Repo update)
  • Task 4: User can delete item (swipe-to-delete + Repo delete + undo)
  1. Each slice must:
  • Deliver observable functionality
  • Be testable in isolation
  • Leave ./gradlew build passing

Step 4: Write Structured Tasks

  1. Create tasks/plan.md with the dependency graph and approach
  2. Create tasks/todo.md with tasks in execution order:
## Tasks

### Task 1: [Short description]
**Files:** `feature/src/.../ItemListScreen.kt`, `core/data/src/.../ItemDao.kt`
**Acceptance criteria:**
- Item list loads from Room database
- Empty state shown when no items exist
- Loading state shown during fetch
**Verification:**
- [ ] `./gradlew test` passes
- [ ] `./gradlew assembleDebug` succeeds
- [ ] Compose Preview renders correctly

Step 5: Order by Dependencies

  1. Sequence tasks so each builds on the previous
  2. Add checkpoints every 2–3 tasks: run full test suite, review with human
  3. Flag risks on tasks with uncertainty — mark as "spike" if investigation needed

Task Sizing Guide

| Size | Files | Duration | Action | |------|-------|----------|--------| | Small | 1–2 | 60 min | Split further |

Split when: task touches >2 independent subsystems, or acceptance criteria exceed 5 items.

Common Rationalizations

| Shortcut | Why It Fails | |----------|-------------| | "I'll plan as I go" | Without a task list, you lose track of scope and dependencies. Rework multiplies. | | "The spec is the plan" | Specs describe what. Plans describe how and in what order. | | "Planning takes too long" | A 10-minute plan prevents hours of backtracking. | | "I know this codebase, I don't need a plan" | Plans catch dependency gaps that familiarity masks. |

Red Flags

  • Implementing without a written task list
  • Tasks missing acceptance criteria
  • No verification steps on tasks
  • Tasks spanning >5 files without splitting
  • No checkpoints between tasks
  • Horizontal slicing (all DAOs, then all repos, then all VMs)

Verification

  • [ ] tasks/plan.md exists with dependency graph
  • [ ] tasks/todo.md exists with ordered tasks
  • [ ] Every task has acceptance criteria and verification steps
  • [ ] Tasks are vertically sliced (each delivers observable functionality)
  • [ ] No task exceeds "Large" sizing without justification
  • [ ] Checkpoints placed every 2–3 tasks
  • [ ] Human has reviewed the plan before implementation starts

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.