AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Native Mvp Stage

skill-hades-hy-li-ai-native-founder-playbook-skills-ai-native-mvp-stage · by Hades-HY-LI

Scope and plan an AI-native MVP after the problem and customer are credible. Use when a founder needs MVP scope, product architecture, coding-agent workflow, evaluation loops, technical debt control, security review, build milestones, or a practical plan for shipping the first useful version.

No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-hades-hy-li-ai-native-founder-playbook-skills-ai-native-mvp-stage

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Ai Native Mvp Stage? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AI-Native MVP Stage

Goal

Help founders ship the smallest product that proves the core customer outcome while keeping AI-generated work testable, secure, and maintainable.

Required Inputs

If the founder provides a structured brief, use these inputs:

Validated customer/problem:
MVP outcome to prove:
Current product status:
Technical stack:
Data/security constraints:
Available builders/tools:
Deadline:
Desired output:

Guided Intake

Do not require the founder to know all implementation details upfront. If the request is thin, ask up to five questions first:

1. What customer problem and user outcome has already been validated?
2. What is the smallest workflow the MVP must prove?
3. What exists today: mockup, prototype, manual workflow, or no product?
4. What technical or data constraints matter most?
5. What do you want next: MVP scope, architecture, coding-agent task plan, eval plan, or milestones?

After the user answers, infer reasonable defaults, mark unknowns explicitly, and produce a build recommendation. Do not block on stack details unless the requested output is technical architecture.

Workflow

  1. Define the MVP proof target: the user outcome that must become measurably easier, faster, cheaper, or better.
  2. Cut scope to the smallest workflow that proves that target.
  3. Use references/mvp-scope.md to separate must-have proof from distracting surface area.
  4. Use references/technical-architecture.md for architecture, coding-agent guardrails, security, and technical debt prevention.
  5. Use references/evals-and-feedback.md to define evaluation, telemetry, bug intake, and customer feedback loops.
  6. Return a build plan with milestones, risks, evals, and acceptance criteria.

AI-Native Workflows

Use generic AI roles:

  • Coding agent: implement bounded tasks with tests and explicit file ownership.
  • Architecture critic: review data flow, security, and maintainability.
  • Evaluation assistant: create test cases, golden examples, and failure taxonomies.
  • User-research assistant: convert feedback into product decisions.

Exit Criteria

The MVP stage is complete when:

  • the core workflow works for real users;
  • the product has enough instrumentation to learn;
  • the team can distinguish product issues from AI quality issues;
  • critical data and security risks are controlled;
  • the next launch audience is clear.

Common Failure Modes

  • Building a broad product instead of proving one workflow.
  • Letting coding agents create unreviewed architecture.
  • Shipping AI behavior without evals or regression checks.
  • Ignoring data permissions, privacy, and failure recovery.
  • Treating demo quality as customer value.

Recommended Outputs

Return the most useful artifact for the request:

  • MVP scope brief;
  • technical architecture review;
  • coding-agent task plan;
  • eval and feedback plan;
  • milestone roadmap.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.