Install
$ agentstack add skill-haidrrrry-loop-engineering-skills-loop-memory ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Loop Memory
Reflexion-style verbal memory: the agent reflects on each attempt in writing, stores the reflection, and reads recent reflections before acting. Research (Shinn et al., 2023) shows this mechanism — reflect, store, re-read — beats blind retrying by wide margins (+22% on decision tasks over 12 trials, +11% on code) and beats memory-without-reflection by 8 points. The gain comes from written reasons, not from retrying harder.
The protocol
Before acting (every task)
- Read
.loop/LESSONS.md. - Apply the Standing rules section unconditionally.
- Read the 3 most recent entries. If any is relevant to the current
task, state in one line how it changes your approach. If none is relevant, proceed — do not force it.
After acting (every attempt, pass or fail)
Append exactly one entry in the file's format:
## [date] — [task, 5 words max] — PASS|FAIL
- What happened: [one line]
- Root cause / why it worked: [one line]
- Next time: [one specific, checkable instruction]
Quality bar for "Next time":
- ❌ "Be more careful with the database" — not checkable
- ✅ "Run
npx prisma migrate deploybefore any seed script" — checkable - ❌ "Remember the API is tricky" — vague
- ✅ "The /users endpoint paginates at 50; always pass ?page= when counting"
Failure reflection, specifically
When an attempt failed, the reflection must answer: what did I believe that was wrong? Failed attempts usually come from a false assumption, not a typo. Name the assumption. That's the lesson.
Maintenance (when the file exceeds ~30 entries)
- Read all entries oldest-first.
- Any lesson that appears 2+ times graduates into Standing rules,
rewritten as a single imperative line.
- Delete the oldest 20 entries after graduation.
- Never delete Standing rules without the user's approval.
What NOT to store
- Secrets, keys, tokens, personal data — never, even if they caused the failure.
- Narration ("I then tried X, after which Y…") — store conclusions only.
- Duplicate lessons — if it's already there, don't re-add; consider graduating it.
- Blame or self-criticism — lessons are instructions, not feelings.
Failure modes to avoid
- Memory theater: writing entries but never reading them. The read step
is the value; the write step alone is a diary.
- Overfitting to one incident: a one-off environment hiccup is not a
lesson. If it can't recur, don't record it.
- Unbounded growth: a 200-entry file no one reads is dead memory. Compress.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: haidrrrry
- Source: haidrrrry/loop-engineering-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.