AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Grizzly Edit

skill-harishdvs-grizzly-grizzly-edit · by HarishDvs

Improve or fix existing prose. Use when the user shares a passage or chapter and asks to improve it, fix it, polish it, tighten it, or asks what's wrong with it. Diagnosis-first, surgical line fixes, never a wholesale rewrite.

No reviews yet
0 installs
5 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-harishdvs-grizzly-grizzly-edit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-harishdvs-grizzly-grizzly-edit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Grizzly Edit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Grizzly Edit — Surgical Editing

Default to diagnosis and surgical line-fixes, never a wholesale rewrite. A page of assistant prose handed back as "the improved version" is exactly what demoralizes authors and erodes their voice.

Procedure

  1. Read first. The full chapter (not the card) if line-editing it. Also load

VOICE.md, STANDARDS.md, and the chapter's codex card (for preserve-lines).

  1. Diagnose precisely. Name each issue with a line reference: "emotion label,

line 34"; "contrast-negation, paragraph 6"; "buried landing: the chapter's key beat is told in its flattest sentence." Issues come from three layers, reported in this order: delivery (does it land), then standards/blacklist violations, then continuity (against the codex).

  1. Propose one tight fix per issue, for that line or sentence only. Show

original and proposed side by side so the author can accept, reject, or tweak each independently.

  1. Prefer cutting to rephrasing. When a line reads as filler, the strongest fix

is deletion, not rewording it into a different shape of the same filler. Reach for the scalpel before the pen.

  1. Don't touch what works. A line that follows the standards and has strong

rhythm is left alone even if you'd phrase it differently. Changing clean lines to your taste is how voice gets eroded.

  1. Preserve-lines are untouchable. Check the card before proposing anything.
  2. Placeholders stay. If the passage has draft gaps or placeholder lines, flag

them and ask; never fill them unasked.

Before showing the author anything (four passes, in order, every time)

These passes are mandatory, not advisory. Self-review alone is unreliable: the model is blind to its own default cadence, so it cannot be the only check.

  1. Tell-scan (the HARD floor). Run the scanner on the passage:

powershell.exe -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File tools/tell-scan.ps1 . When editing inline and no file write is made yet, mentally apply the same HARD rules: em dash, "too X to", "not X but Y", report-frames (realized / noticed / felt / sensed). Any HARD hit must be fixed before presenting. Tell-scan is the floor, not the ceiling.

  1. Separate-reader blacklist audit. A fresh reader with no memory of writing the

lines, checking the proposed lines against decks/blacklist.md and VOICE.md. For any non-trivial edit, SHOULD spawn a subagent to run this audit rather than self-reviewing in the same context: the fix you just made is where a new tell sneaks in (you cut an em dash and replaced it with a rule-of-three; you removed a negation and added "the weight of it"), and self-review cannot catch the model's own default cadence. Correct survivors silently.

  1. Register and tense pass. Run decks/register-tense.md on the proposed lines.

You swapped an em dash for a trailerese button ("We hold the line"); your fix leaked present tense into the past-tense spine ("he turns"). Keep narration simple past, vows on the future modal, and never trade a tell for a clinical or hidden-tech idiom. The cure is grammar and cadence, never archaism.

  1. Delivery pass: run decks/delivery-pass.md on the proposed lines. A fix that

strips a tell but leaves the beat flatter has not improved the line. If the beat won't land, say so and show the benchmark comparison instead.

When the author explicitly asks for a fuller rewrite

Still show it as a proposal against the original, in beats (not one block), with both passes run first. If the passage needs heavy work, say so and offer to go through it beat by beat rather than silently rewriting.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.