AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Blue Green Deployment For Live Strategy Updates

skill-himanshuj16-algo-trading-skills-blue-green-deployment-for-live-strategy-updates · by HimanshuJ16

>-

— No reviews yet
0 installs
19 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-himanshuj16-algo-trading-skills-blue-green-deployment-for-live-strategy-updates

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-himanshuj16-algo-trading-skills-blue-green-deployment-for-live-strategy-updates)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 14d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Blue Green Deployment For Live Strategy Updates? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

When to Use

Invoke this skill when a strategy that is currently routing live orders and holding positions must be replaced with a new build, and stopping it until the next maintenance window is not acceptable. Two instances (BLUE and GREEN) run side by side; exactly one of them holds routing authority at any instant, and the handover carries the book with it.

Use it when: the strategy holds overnight or intraday inventory that cannot be flattened for the deploy; market coverage gaps cost money (market making, hedging, continuous execution); or you need a rehearsed, sub-minute path back to the previous version.

When NOT to Use

Do not use it when:

  • The book is flat and the venue is closed. A plain restart is simpler, and simpler is

safer — blue-green exists to solve a problem you do not have in that window.

  • The change is configuration or a risk-parameter update that your system can reload

without a new process. Do not spin up a second instance to change a number.

  • You cannot actually afford two live instances. Two copies mean double the market-data

subscriptions, double the hardware, and — during the drain window — double the licence and colocation footprint.

  • Your broker or venue session does not permit it. Many retail broker APIs authenticate

one session per account, or allow only one order-placing connection at a time; verify your broker's concurrency rules before assuming two instances can coexist, because a second login that silently invalidates the first one turns a zero-downtime deploy into an outage with an open position.

  • What you actually need is to stop. If the running strategy is misbehaving right now,

the primitive is the kill switch (kill-switch-and-drawdown-circuit-breakers), not a deployment.

Prerequisites

  • Two isolated strategy instances, both able to consume market data independently, with

resource isolation so GREEN's startup does not degrade BLUE's live trading.

  • A health check that proves fitness to trade, not just that a process is running:

market data flowing and current, order gateway reachable, risk limits loaded, signal output within sane bounds.

  • A state synchronization routine that transfers positions, open/working orders and

live alpha state from the outgoing instance to the incoming one, and reports failure honestly rather than partially succeeding in silence.

  • Idempotent client order IDs (order-placement-idempotency). A cutover is exactly the

moment two instances can both believe they own an in-flight order.

  • A working kill switch (kill-switch-and-drawdown-circuit-breakers). It is the correct

fallback whenever rollback is refused, and this skill's workflow depends on it existing.

  • An execution layer that gates every submission on the routing pointer, by calling

BlueGreenDeployer.is_authorised_to_route(color) — not a cached boolean, not a direct read of the slots dict.

  • A named person authorizing the deployment. For EU investment firms this is mandatory,

not good practice — see references/standards.md.

Workflow

  1. Record the baseline. Construct the deployer with initial_version set to the

version already live. A history that starts at the first deployment cannot say what was running before it, which makes the pre-existing version unidentifiable in a post-incident review.

  1. Stage the new version on the standby slot with `deploytoinactive(version,

authorised_by=...). It refuses to write over a DRAINING` slot — that slot is the last-known-good rollback target, and overwriting it is how teams discover mid-incident that they have nothing to roll back to.

  1. Shadow-run and health-check. GREEN consumes live market data and generates signals

but emits no orders. Warmup (JIT, risk-model compilation, cache fill) runs outside the deployer's lock so an emergency rollback of the live slot is never blocked behind it. A failed health check is a normal outcome: the slot lands in FAILED, which is redeployable, and the pipeline is not stuck.

  1. Cut over with cutover(authorised_by=...). Health is re-checked *at the instant of

the swap*, then state is synchronized, then the pointer moves — all in one critical section, so there is no window where both slots or neither slot is authorized.

  1. If cutover is refused, classify before retrying. A failed pre-cutover health check

means the staged instance degraded while parked; investigate the instance. A failed state sync is different: the sync may have partially applied, so the slot is quarantined as FAILED deliberately. Do not retry the cutover onto a possibly torn book — redeploy the version cleanly instead.

  1. Observe GREEN under real flow before touching anything else. BLUE stays DRAINING:

no signal generation, but still holding last-known-good state as the rollback target.

  1. If GREEN misbehaves, roll back with rollback(authorised_by=...). This is not a

pointer swap: BLUE's book is stale by however long GREEN was live, so state is reconciled backwards from GREEN to BLUE first, and the rollback is refused if that reconciliation fails or if BLUE is not a viable target.

  1. If rollback is refused, use the kill switch — do not reach for force=True.

Refusal means the target's book cannot be trusted; routing live flow to a strategy with a wrong position does more damage than staying put. Halt, cancel working orders, reconcile against the broker by hand, and only then consider a forced rollback. Every guard a forced rollback overrides is named in the audit record.

  1. Decommission only after a full observation window with `decommission_standby(

authorised_by=...)`. This is the deliberate end of the drain window: after it returns there is no rollback target until a new version has been deployed and cut over. Weigh it against reclaiming the hardware, and record who accepted that trade.

> Full step-by-step procedure, including the shadow-mode and state-transfer mechanics: > see references/workflows.md. > Regulatory touchpoints and engineering standards: see references/standards.md. > Printable cutover sign-off checklist: see assets/checklist.md.

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating rollback as a bare pointer swap. Once GREEN has traded, BLUE's positions

and open orders are stale. Swapping back without reconciling hands the market to a strategy that believes it holds a position it no longer has — and it will "correct" that phantom position with real orders.

  • Assuming a hot standby has a current book because it consumes market data. Market

data does not carry the live instance's fills. A standby that is not also consuming the execution/drop-copy stream has a stale position the moment the live instance trades.

  • Trusting a READY stamp from minutes ago. Between staging and cutover the staged

instance can lose its market data feed, drift out of risk limits, or die outright. Re-check health inside the same critical section as the swap.

  • Retrying a cutover after a failed state sync. The failure may have left the target

with a partially applied book; retrying cuts over onto it.

  • Deploying over the DRAINING slot to "save a step". That slot is the rollback

target. Releasing it must be an explicit, attributable act.

  • Decommissioning as soon as the cutover succeeds. The failure modes that matter —

a bad fill model, a signal that only misbehaves at the close, a slow memory leak — show up later in the session, after you have thrown away the way back.

  • Cutting over with a large working-order book. Orders BLUE placed are live at the

venue; if the sync does not hand them over precisely, GREEN will not manage them and they become orphans nobody cancels. Prefer a quiet moment with few resting orders.

  • Letting the execution layer cache "am I live?". Both instances then believe they

are authorized across the swap and duplicate submissions. Gate every submission on is_authorised_to_route().

  • Unbounded health or sync callbacks. cutover() and rollback() hold the lock

across those callbacks so the swap is atomic — which means a hung callback stalls order submission itself, not just deployment. Bound both with your own timeout.

  • Using force=True routinely. It exists for the case where a human has already

reconciled the book by other means. Habitual use converts every guard in this skill into decoration.

Verification

  • Run the unit suite and confirm every test passes:

python -m unittest discover -s skills/blue-green-deployment-for-live-strategy-updates/scripts

  • Assert the safety invariant continuously in staging: at every instant, exactly one slot

returns True from is_authorised_to_route() — never zero, never two — including while a cutover is in flight.

  • Run fault-injection drills against a paper/simulated venue, not just the happy path:

kill the staged instance between READY and cutover (cutover must abort); fail the state sync (slot must quarantine, routing must not move); fail the backward sync during rollback (rollback must be refused and point you at the kill switch).

  • Reconcile positions against the broker immediately after every cutover and rollback.

The deployer moves routing; it cannot confirm the venue agrees with your book.

  • Export deployment_history after each drill and confirm each entry carries an

authorizer, that refused operations are present (not just successful ones), and that any forced rollback is flagged forced with the overridden guard named.

Related Skills

  • kill-switch-and-drawdown-circuit-breakers
  • order-placement-idempotency
  • paper-to-live-promotion-checklist
  • multi-region-failover-for-broker-connectivity
  • structured-logging-for-post-incident-forensics
  • mifid-ii-algo-trading-compliance-eu

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.